• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Presidential Election 2024 - Trump vs Harris - Vote Hard with a Vengence

Status
Not open for further replies.
See I'm thinking the opposite. Regardless of who wins there won't be a civilian war. No riots in the streets. No end of days.

During Obamas election there were fears of all the white supremacist losets rising up and being violent.

During Trumps election there was talk of the US turning into Nazi Germany if he got elected.

Trump Vs Biden - Trump losing meant a civil war. Biden winning meant Republicans would get rounded up and so on.

My guess is regardless of who wins, the US will look like the last 4 years. And last 4 years before that.
The difference is that Jan 6 radically changed things. The other examples were hypothetical, but that time, people actually got into the Capitol.

What would have happened if the guards actually let them into the House or Senate, when they were in session?

Jan 6th was that “holy crap, this isn’t hypothetical anymore” moment for me.
 
See I'm thinking the opposite. Regardless of who wins there won't be a civilian war. No riots in the streets. No end of days.

During Obamas election there were fears of all the white supremacist losets rising up and being violent.

During Trumps election there was talk of the US turning into Nazi Germany if he got elected.

Trump Vs Biden - Trump losing meant a civil war. Biden winning meant Republicans would get rounded up and so on.

My guess is regardless of who wins, the US will look like the last 4 years. And last 4 years before that.
I’m not saying civil war or riots in the streets. I’m more thinking IMVE threats who right now are hoping for a Trump win, but who may resort to domestic terrorism in the event of a loss. That’s always been there and always will be, but it can boil up or simmer down depending on how much they feel the elected government will act on their grievances.

A lot of people don’t accept the legitimacy of any government generally, and a Democrat one in particular. Grievances without a perceived sympathetic political outlet can boil over. Don’t forget that some people are simply irrational and unhinged, and that threats to their ideology can simply be the spark to the mental health powderkeg.
 
But once again, going back to @KevinB ‘s example and other posters here, there are the ones who are not declaring either way to polls. Abortion could totally be a top priority for them.
Polls are more reliable than peoples' gut feelings based on yard signs and what the people in their social circle or even social group are saying.
As an aside, I’m not sure how something that affects over 50% of the population (I’m including people who aren’t yet, or are past, childbearing age because they also either have, or will be, affected) is not in the top 10 issues.
I've written before that surveys indicate most Americans favour some restrictions, and right now the Democratic position is to aim for none. If the surveys properly represent American attitudes, then immediately the fraction favouring the Democratic position is less than a simple majority.
 
yeah, they likely fell for the conservatives who said they were just fear mongering and stuff and had nothing to worry about…
Sure, just like the 2A is safe, or any other issue on which one side reassures the other that they won't try, or won't be able to, flip the status quo.
 
If you don't mind me asking, when can election signs be displayed, and when must they be removed, in your community?

Sorry I was at Hockey for most of the day.

On your own property in my county you can have signs up all year. There are a number of folks who do it.

There is no size restriction or number restriction.
 
Sorry I was at Hockey for most of the day.

On your own property in my county you can have signs up all year. There are a number of folks who do it.

There is no size restriction or number restriction.
The first amendment trumps (pun intended) the HOA regulations.

:giggle:
 
Classic example of Nut-Picking

There are tiktoks from Democrats advising wives to file for divorce if their husband votes GOP... Both sides have crazies, focusing ont he extremes leads nowhere. Both sides have ample numbers of idiots to keep us all busy 24/7...
There are absolutely idiots on both sides. It’s just funny and a bit hypocritical that the religious Christians who idolize him missed the whole “idolatry” part of the Bible.

The Economist isn’t really known for being sensational, so if they’re talking about it…



Separately, the author of “Fire and Fury” back in 2017 or so released the interview with Jeffery Epstein. The sad part (to me) is that while these allegations would have sunk any other candidate, I read the article and I thought that it isn’t even in the top 5 of things I would list for Trump.



Also, The Atlantic has a lengthy piece on the internal turmoil in the Trump campaign. I didn’t know about this article until I read Laura Loomer’s response on Reddit.


1730626519980.png
 
Last edited:
There are absolutely idiots on both sides. It’s just funny and a bit hypocritical that the religious Christians who idolize him missed the whole “idolatry” part of the Bible.

The Economist isn’t really known for being sensational, so if they’re talking about it…



Separately, the author of “Fire and Fury” back in 2017 or so released the interview with Jeffery Epstein. The sad part (to me) is that while these allegations would have sunk any other candidate, I read the article and I thought that it isn’t even in the top 5 of things I would list for Trump.



This won’t move the needle at all. Anyone still hanging on to Trump at this point with everything he’s said and done, and everything that’s known about him, will not be moved one bit by any further details that could conceivably emerge about Trump’s friendship with Epstein and any behaviour he might have taken part in in that context. Trump has already been found liable in civil court for rape; anything new would need to be worse than that to be noticed. There’s likely no new light to be shed there, and even if something heinous and verified were revealed MAGA would simply dismiss it as a fabrication. Most of his base has, at this point, essentially granted him immunity for anything he may ever do or be shown to have done.
 
This won’t move the needle at all. Anyone still hanging on to Trump at this point with everything he’s said and done, and everything that’s known about him, will not be moved one bit by any further details that could conceivably emerge about Trump’s friendship with Epstein and any behaviour he might have taken part in in that context. Trump has already been found liable in civil court for rape; anything new would need to be worse than that to be noticed. There’s likely no new light to be shed there, and even if something heinous and verified were revealed MAGA would simply dismiss it as a fabrication. Most of his base has, at this point, essentially granted him immunity for anything he may ever do or be shown to have done.
It's a cult. His supporters* are members of a cult. A fascist cult.

*American supporters
 
The first amendment trumps (pun intended) the HOA regulations.

:giggle:
Actually, it’s been sort of like coming to the nuisance , but in reverse as by moving into an HOA you are agreeing to follow their rules.

There have been a few interesting cases dealing with election signs - and the last one I saw in VA ended in a compromise that the HOA was required to allow signage during a period prior and after an election, but could limit the size and number.

I don’t have an HOA, but frankly I don’t really like broadcasting my beliefs in public in my neighborhood. (I save that for the internet)
 
It's a cult. His supporters* are members of a cult. A fascist cult.

*American supporters
I suppose that his supporters stopped trusting the "system" after Mueller published his report. They can't know how far the rot went. Unfortunate, that. It will take a while for the "system" to recover its credibility, in their eyes.
 
I suppose that his supporters stopped trusting the "system" after Mueller published his report. They can't know how far the rot went. Unfortunate, that. It will take a while for the "system" to recover its credibility, in their eyes.
The Mueller investigation led to eight people with varying proximity to Trump - some from his inner circle - being convicted of crimes. Several went to prison. A bunch more in Russia are indicted but obviously won’t face American justice. I can understand why Trump’s personality cult would not be pleased with this outcome; it was not in their interest to have these proceedings and convictions showing how far the rot went.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top