Jarnhamar
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 7,393
- Points
- 1,160
You're a Sentinel, aren't you.See, I told you Fish needed a laugh. Maybe a hug too.
You're a Sentinel, aren't you.See, I told you Fish needed a laugh. Maybe a hug too.
What narrative exactly did you "read"? I get that you generally automatically assume any policy positionYou too can go take a flying fig. I read the narrative that started it, thought it was funny and needed no more participation on my part. Except to put my emoji in. You need to get a life outside the weedbed buddy.
Actually, she accepted Rogan's request to appear on his show. However, their campaign is so busy and they are extremely happy with the impact it's having, that they had neither the time nor saw the necessity to go out of their way to make it happen. They told Rogan that they'd be happy to give him an hour but he'd have to fly to them; that Harris did not have the time in her campaign schedule to fly to Texas for a 3hr show. Otherwise, they were happy to do it.Harris takes a safer option than appearing on Joe Rogans unscripted Podcast.
Harris Will Make Surprise Appearance on ‘Saturday Night Live’
Well damn, that’s that surprise ruined. Maya Rudolph’s been doing a pretty good Kamala Harris impression, and having Andy Samberg back playing her husband has been a treat. They brought back an old SNL alum (whose name escapes me) to play an increasingly doddering Biden, and it’s been pretty funny.Harris takes a safer option than appearing on Joe Rogans unscripted Podcast.
Harris Will Make Surprise Appearance on ‘Saturday Night Live’
I don't answer people that call me fascist.What narrative exactly did you "read"? I get that you generally automatically assume any policy positionof the Democratsthat deals with basic human decency is "laughable", but I just don't see how you read a headline about women dying due to lack of access to medically necessary abortions, and think "Ha! More liberal garbage."
you'll double down with a page long narrative
That's certainly one way to say that only one of the two of you substantiates their arguments.
Link to the Newsweek article about the Rogan interview:Actually, she accepted Rogan's request to appear on his show. However, their campaign is so busy and they are extremely happy with the impact it's having, that they had neither the time nor saw the necessity to go out of their way to make it happen. They told Rogan that they'd be happy to give him an hour but he'd have to fly to them; that Harris did not have the time in her campaign schedule to fly to Texas for a 3hr show. Otherwise, they were happy to do it.
People who are in the lead, and who are confident in their lead, stick to their game plan, and don't start throwing around gimmicks (like, oh, I dunno, working at a fast food restaurant, driving a garbage truck, etc) to see what sticks.
Offering to talk with Joe Rogan for an hour in Washington isn't accepting to appear on his show. His show is in Austin Texas and it's 3 hours.Actually, she accepted Rogan's request to appear on his show.
I left this thread specifically for what is happening again. You want to try bully me, get my goat, poke me in the eye. Do it by PM. You won't get an answer here. I'll be back when there is a new POTUS.
So long as some shitheel doesn't try denigrate me with bullshit.
Harris is now polling ahead of Trump in Iowa! Its within MOE, and might not flip, but in Ohio as well Trump is leading only within the MOE. Huge.
I fear you’re right. There’s zero chance Trump concedes even a clear loss, and he has enough radicalized sycophants holding out an almost religious faith in a Trump that it could get really ugly, like violent ugly, once reality sets in.Be careful what y’all wish for. It may not be pleasant after the election
“Almost”?I fear you’re right. There’s zero chance Trump concedes even a clear loss, and he has enough radicalized sycophants holding out an almost religious faith in a Trump that it could get really ugly, like violent ugly, once reality sets in.
Never mind conceding he could also prematurely declare victory which win or lose won’t be helpful.I fear you’re right. There’s zero chance Trump concedes even a clear loss, and he has enough radicalized sycophants holding out an almost religious faith in a Trump that it could get really ugly, like violent ugly, once reality sets in.
So…like last time?Never mind conceding he could also prematurely declare victory which win or lose won’t be helpful.
See I'm thinking the opposite. Regardless of who wins there won't be a civilian war. No riots in the streets. No end of days.I fear you’re right. There’s zero chance Trump concedes even a clear loss, and he has enough radicalized sycophants holding out an almost religious faith in a Trump that it could get really ugly, like violent ugly, once reality sets in.
I think you are most likely right BUT there could be a few idiots who will take things way too far.Trump Vs Biden - Trump losing meant a civil war. Biden winning meant Republicans would get rounded up and so on.
My guess is regardless of who wins, the US will look like the last 4 years. And last 4 years before that.