• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Trump seems to be holding approval in some circles: "Rob Bluey, president and executive editor of the Daily Signal, and Julian Epstein, longtime Democratic operative, attorney, and former chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, gave Trump grades of A-F on some of the top issues"



As of March 4th, 2025, the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-eight percent (48%) disapprove.
Its a poll from Fox News - if they ran a poll on Fox News, 'Do you believe Man walked on the earth at the same time as Dinosaurs?', I have little doubt that over 35% of respondents would say 'Yes, I do believe that'.
 
Its a poll from Fox News - if they ran a poll on Fox News, 'Do you believe Man walked on the earth at the same time as Dinosaurs?', I have little doubt that over 35% of respondents would say 'Yes, I do believe that'.

No. The Fox article contains comments from two people scoring a handful of issues. One person is right leaning and one left leaning. As to the Rasmussen poll, that is a separate thing.
 
Hegsteth pretty much said as much.
That
I have a feeling the "invasion" threat is going to be towards Mexico (if Nasterova's sources are correct), with the announcement yesterday that another couple thousand troops are being sent to the border.

That from purely military point of view would be........... stupid .
Some of that terrain is pretty scary. I don't care how competent your military is .
Politically and from a military point of view why would you ...
Picture having Cuba and North Korea with landborder with you for the next 50 or more years.
The Mexicans aren't exactly in love with the Americans to begin with. How's the Mexican saying go ?
" Poor Mexico , so far from God so close to the United States."
 
Last edited:
DOGE will lose it's lustre when the effects come due. Like services one used to get and are no longer supported. Favorite uncle who is a war vet got laid off and losing their home. This type of cutting always comes with self-inflicted wounds.
Hey, it’s Canada’s & Mexico’s fault, right?
 
All of VDH's points are important. But particularly the part on budgets, defence, and borders.



Who Caused the Counter-Revolution?
44 Comments / February 27, 2025
At some point, some president was going to have to stop the unsustainable spending and borrowing.

To have any country left, some president would eventually have had to restore a nonexistent border and stop the influx of 3 million illegal aliens a year.

Some commander-in-chief finally would have to try to stop the theater wars abroad.

But any president who dared to do any of that would be damned for curbing the madness that his predecessors fueled.

And so none did—until now.


Not since Franklin Roosevelt’s rapid and mass implementation of the New Deal administrative state have Americans seen such radical changes so quickly as now in Trump’s first month of governance.

Americans are watching a long-awaited counter-revolution to bring the country out of its madness by restoring the common sense of the recent past.

It is easy to run up massive debts and hard to pay them back. Politicians profit by handing out grants and hiring thousands with someone else’s money or creating new programs by growing the debt.

Yet it is unpopular and considered “mean” to spend only what you have and to create a lean, competent workforce.

1776, not 1619, is the foundational date of America.

Biological men should not manipulate their greater size and strength to undermine the hard-won accomplishment of women athletes.

Affordable fossil fuels, when used wisely, are still essential to modern prosperity.

American education must remain empirical and inductive, not regress into indoctrination and deduction. If college campuses no longer abide by the Bill of Rights, then perhaps they should pay taxes on income from their endowments and guarantee their own student loans.

If American citizens are arrested and arraigned for violent assaults, destroying property, and resisting arrest, then surely foreign students who break the laws of their hosts should be held to the same account—and if guilty, go home.

Tribalism and racialism, and government spoils allotted by superficial appearances, are the marks of a pre-civilized society. Such racialism leads only to endless factions and discord.

It is easy to destroy a border, and hard to reconstruct it. And it was not Trump who invited in 12 million unaudited illegal aliens, a half million of them criminals.

Who is the real culprit in the Defense Department—the new secretary with the hard task of restoring the idea among depleted ranks that our race, religion, and gender are incidental, not essential, to defeating the enemy and ensuring our national security?

Is it really wise to divert money from needed combat units and weapons to indoctrinate recruits with social and cultural agendas that do not enhance, but likely undermine, our national defenses?

Who is the real callous actor—Elon Musk, who is trying to prevent the country from insolvency by eliminating fraud and waste, or those who bloated the bureaucracy in the first place with jobs and subsidies for their constituents, friends, clients, and fellow ideologues?


No one likes to fire FBI agents.

That certainly is an unpleasant job for the new FBI Director, Kash Patel.

But again, who are the true culprits who so cavalierly turned a hallowed agenda into a weaponized tool to warp elections, harass political enemies, lie under oath, surveil parents at school board meetings, doctor court documents, and protect insider friends?

Massive borrowing is an opiate addiction that needs shock treatment, not more deficits to break the habit. An unchecked administrative state becomes an organic organism that exists only to grow larger, more powerful, and more resistant to any who seek to curb it.

Yet those who brought the cultural revolution of the last years are now screaming that it is unfair to restore what they undermined. It is as if a patient blames only the tough chemotherapy and not the invasive cancer that it seeks to cure.

Most of the Trump people are not high-fiving firing people. They are not laying off miners or frackers and directing them to go “code” or dismissing half the country as “deplorables.”

The left screams that those who are tasked with balancing a budget and pruning back a strangling bureaucracy are heartless.

No, the pitiless are those who recklessly sought to hire with borrowed money and fire people on the basis of their race, used federal programs to feather their own nests, and harassed and arrested those for their politics.

No SWAT teams are now raiding the homes of ex-presidents.

No one is trying to take a presidential rival off state ballots.

No one is coordinating local, state, and federal prosecutors to indict, harass, and bankrupt an ex-president.

And no president—his dementia sheathed by political insiders and toadish media—is working three days a week, avoiding press conferences, or stonewalling reporters’ questions.

No wonder the current normal seems abnormal to the status quo of the recent past.
 
Keeping in mind "the tall poppy syndrome", and thinking about our own party structures up here, I think the person on the throne is less of a problem than the person beside the throne. And those behind the throne.

Having said that, the US still has viable control mechanisms.

House of Representatives

218 Republicans
215 Democrats
2 Vacancies

All it takes is 2 conviction Republicans to join the Democrats, if the Democrats hold.

Senate

53 Republicans
45 Democrats
2 Independents

The Democrats need to pick up the Independents (Sanders and King) and 4 Republicans (Collins, Murkowski, Young and 1 other)
And this is something that has me confused. I don't have a deep understanding of the US system of governance, but we've heard nothing but a parade of Executive Orders ranging from the mundane (Kennedy Center Board of Directors) to the important (violating trade agreements), and an Executive that has hired and fired and mused about invading countries, yet there seems to be virtual silence from the Legislative part of the system.

Are they not sitting? Are they cowed?
 
No. The Fox article contains comments from two people scoring a handful of issues. One person is right leaning and one left leaning. As to the Rasmussen poll, that is a separate thing.
As for pundits giving their thoughts, regardless of what side of the aisle they are from, I am reminded that you can
And this is something that has me confused. I don't have a deep understanding of the US system of governance, but we've heard nothing but a parade of Executive Orders ranging from the mundane (Kennedy Center Board of Directors) to the important (violating trade agreements), and an Executive that has hired and fired and mused about invading countries, yet there seems to be virtual silence from the Legislative part of the system.

Are they not sitting? Are they cowed?
its partly this tradition of the first 100 days crap I think.
That the president, any president, runs amok like a sailor with a full box of condoms after 60+ days at sea on the first day of shore leave.
 
, yet there seems to be virtual silence from the Legislative part of the system.

Are they not sitting? Are they cowed?
republicans hold both the senate and the house of representatives. for the most part they agree with what trump is doing and if they don't they lack the spine to speak out.
 
Lots of back braces need to be sold in DC right about now.

As the Rasmussen polling suggests Trump is holding steady as far as support goes. Doubtful many House and Senate people want to go against the people that voted for them.
 
And this is something that has me confused. I don't have a deep understanding of the US system of governance, but we've heard nothing but a parade of Executive Orders ranging from the mundane (Kennedy Center Board of Directors) to the important (violating trade agreements), and an Executive that has hired and fired and mused about invading countries, yet there seems to be virtual silence from the Legislative part of the system.

Are they not sitting? Are they cowed?
This is why I'm a Parliamentary supremacist. Governing by decree, even if elected is kinda gross to me.
 
Last edited:
If anyone was wondering about the Presidential Address don't worry you are missing nothing. Going exactly as expected, an old dude rambling and Republicans going absolutely feral over every word.

Unironically this has manifested into reality:
 
If anyone was wondering about the Presidential Address don't worry you are missing nothing. Going exactly as expected, an old dude rambling and X going absolutely feral over every word.

That’s literally every address since the dawn of time.
 
Back
Top