Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 12,442
- Points
- 1,160
The truth is strong in this one.7,000 pistols is enough to equip al the HQ types across the country to boost their LCF in front of the troops.
The truth is strong in this one.7,000 pistols is enough to equip al the HQ types across the country to boost their LCF in front of the troops.
In all seriousness the CAF is not serious about a pistol replacement nor training people to effectively employ them. As you said, they are a status symbol and nothing more.7,000 pistols is enough to equip al the HQ types across the country to boost their LCF in front of the troops.
If it gets a project team experienced and they have a "win", likley they are ready for a more complex project.Frankly I think the pistol should be the primary learning tool for the Military on basic marksmanship -- pistols are hard to shoot well due, and pistol ammo is cheap, compared to rifle ammo - and generally most pistols last longer (round count) and are both cheaper to get than rifles/carbines, and cheaper to maintain. The bonus is due to the small size - they are a great safety training tool.
In short I think everyone should be issued one ---
BUT I still stand on my previous statements that it should have been a much lower priority item.
Modern NODS, and for the C8's a decent rail , MFAL, Suppressors, LPVO would have been a much better upgrade for weapons -- let alone the massive big ticket deficiencies...
The original RFP called for up to 22,000 units. We're getting initially 7,000 and, at best, 16,000. That being said, according to the news release, this is an Army-centric buy. The other services will (may) be equipped later.If it gets a project team experienced and they have a "win", likely they are ready for a more complex project.
The original RFP called for up to 22,000 units. We're getting initially 7,000 and, at best, 16,000. That being said, according to the news release, this is an Army-centric buy. The other services will (may) be equipped later.
Remember, too, that this has dragged on so long that the project is older than the project team members.
Pretty sure the intent was to also replace the P225, P226 and P239 with the new gun, as the modular frame and slide method can accomplish all their roles in one.
- I thought the RCN uses Sig Sauers exclusively, not the Browning?
- Aside from fighter crews, I don't know who in the RCAF regularly uses the 9mm unless deployed.
MH.
- I thought the RCN uses Sig Sauers exclusively, not the Browning?
- Aside from fighter crews, I don't know who in the RCAF regularly uses the 9mm unless deployed.
Too much, if you ask the RCN.Are you really RCAF though?
Good idea fairyToo much, if you ask the RCN.
Huh? If you ask the RCAF…
But is it flight and ship certified......Pretty sure the intent was to also replace the P225, P226 and P239 with the new gun, as the modular frame and slide method can accomplish all their roles in one.
...and have the RCN wings for the MH folks.Or issue Tac Hel pilots blue ranks with Army insignia on them.
I bet 434 Sqn still has the Hi-Power on the OT&E waiting list...But is it flight and ship certified......
Webley, probably…I bet 434 Sqn still has the Hi-Power on the OT&E waiting list...
Yes in both .455 and 38S&WI enjoy shooting my Webley.
I wish I had one... I'm not really into handguns, but a Webley would be nice.I enjoy shooting my Webley.