• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

This Leadership Approach Is Damaging Careers. A Harvard Business Review Study Explains Why


Army.ca Dinosaur
Reaction score
Hits the nail on the noggin'

Professional development is not extra work without structure. To avoid sapping employees' energy and feeding scope creep, you have to build a program for career advancement.

In the wake of the Great Resignation, many business leaders have frantically sought ways to keep their best talent on board. There's no one-size-fits-all solution, of course -- it depends on industry, available resources, business makeup, and at least a dozen other factors.

There is one recurring best practice that seems to have consistent impact, however: Offer professional development. In other words, give your employees the opportunity to level up in their careers with skills training and credentialing.

Companies with inchoate or absent professional development programs can often be tempted to take an "in the moment" tack: delegate work to those down the ladder so they get experience in management, strategy development, and leadership.

As The Harvard Business Review (HBR) revealed in a series of studies, however, this well-meaning attempt at informal professional development can quickly go belly up. Research suggests that it often reduces employees' energy levels and job satisfaction, making them reluctant to take on similar "outside the box" tasks in the future.

The root of that energy sap? Lack of leadership support. HBR studies revealed that, in many cases, employees who were given additional responsibilities didn't have ongoing guidance from higher-ups. They were left to their own devices.

But there's another piece here that the HBR article doesn't touch on, but is equally as important: job creep. It's often disguised as professional development, but there's a fine line between leveling up one's skills and simply taking on more work.

Many businesses encourage employees to stretch themselves beyond their job description to show they're ready for a promotion, and yet there's no formal process in place for determining what that additional work should be or how it figures into considerations for promotion.

My point is this: Giving your employees extra work and calling it professional development without thought, structure, or planning is more than just a cop out -- it's borderline abusive, and might push your best talent to leave.