- Reaction score
- 23,000
- Points
- 1,260
![www.newsweek.com](https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2480962/kyiv-drone-shahed.jpg)
Ukraine discovers Starlink on downed Russian Shahed drone: Report
Iranian-designed Shahed-136 and the smaller versions of the attack drones have been a key tool in Moscow's arsenal.
![www.newsweek.com](https://g.newsweek.com/themes/newsweek/favicons/favicon-32x32.png)
![]()
Ukraine discovers Starlink on downed Russian Shahed drone: Report
Iranian-designed Shahed-136 and the smaller versions of the attack drones have been a key tool in Moscow's arsenal.www.newsweek.com
Which would geoblock all Starlink dishes located inside Ukrainian borders, which seems like something UAF would have an issue with...Even secondary sanctions are no good if they are not enforced. And Musk could very easily geoblock them as soon as they crossed the border. Which of course he won't unless forced to.
Just another version of a old weapon going all the way back to Greek FireMy God but we're good.
Man's inhumanity to man.
![]()
Ukraine Now Using Dragon Drones To Burn Russian Bunkers, Tanks
Initially used to attack Russians hiding in treelines and trenches, Ukraine's thermite-spewing Dragon drones are taking on new targets.www.twz.com
Just another version of a old weapon going all the way back to Greek Fire
![]()
Frightens the crap out of everyone. It’s telling in the aftermath of WWII a war that saw basically every horror weapon available to man, the only thing that they really wanted banned was flame throwers (which Canada notably didn’t sign on).Still frightens the crap out of me. The number one way I don't want to go.
Still frightens the crap out of me. The number one way I don't want to go.
But would it really? Each dish has s unique digital id. You would not be blocking the transmission/reception of signals by the network for any that were 'tagged' with the (in)appropriate GPS location but only the subset of those that were not registered to Ukrainian users (vetted) based on the individual Starlink dish identifiersWhich would geoblock all Starlink dishes located inside Ukrainian borders, which seems like something UAF would have an issue with...
I'm sure SpaceX is turning off illegally obtained dishes but to think they're going to actively scan their network on a minute by minute basis is absolutely silly. Maybe instead of worrying about Starlink on Shaheds maybe we should focus on the supply of actual ShahedsBut would it really? Each dish has s unique digital id. You would not be blocking the transmission/reception of signals by the network for any that were 'tagged' with the (in)appropriate hps location but only the subset of those that were not registered to Ukrainian users (vetted) based on the individual unit identifiers
Agreed on supply of guidance components, they are already building in country.I'm sure SpaceX is turning off illegally obtained dishes but to think they're going to actively scan their network on a minute by minute basis is absolutely silly. Maybe instead of worrying about Starlink on Shaheds maybe we should focus on the supply of actual Shaheds
BastardNoted![]()
I couldn't agree with you more mate, especially the analogy of being too close to the trees to see the forest.A wider view of the conflicts and inter-relationships. I stand by my assertion 2 years ago that we are witnessing the early stages of WW3. nfortunately many are too close to the trees to see the forest.
The good news is that you'd likely not die of burning; typically the deceased die of asphyxiation.Still frightens the crap out of me. The number one way I don't want to go.
It is a subscription service. They already actively gatekeep who can access.I'm sure SpaceX is turning off illegally obtained dishes but to think they're going to actively scan their network on a minute by minute basis is absolutely silly.
FIFY.It is a subscription service. They CAN already actively gatekeep who can access.