And what came of that presser? Nothing. More obscurity. She was like "Nothing to worry about here". And Jagmeet Singh was just the opposite. He was worried.
And out of my whole post you pick that one line and only reply to it. As expected, you show no real insight into or understanding of the subject matter.
I have a lot more "whole picture" understanding than you will EVER have. If I was overly concerned about the exactness of the laws, I can take the time to bug lawyer friends to read it and explain the gritty details to me.
I will defer to your lawyer friends and their real life experience with investigations and prosecutions under the Security of Information Act.
They'd have to find something else to fake outrage about.
Probably the same thing. Just read the report.
Your showing your lack of political situational awareness. No one gives a rats ass now if he had his clearance and took the briefing or not. The wild west of Canadian politics has way moved on from that. Its grasping at desperate smear attempts like that that leaves the anti-Poilievre crowd in the very small minority.
Sure Rick. Whatever calms you down. But thanks for stating his refusal to read it is politically motivated. On that we agree.
Broken clock is right twice a day, which one of us is the broken clock?
Seriously, in my mind, you don't separate good politics from doing what is right. Where as bad politics (or bad political moves) are just that.
