• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2022 CPC Leadership Discussion: Et tu Redeux

Re- differences in CPC/LPC housing policy


If you believe in one there's not much room for extreme criticism of the other, they're pulling the same levers. To be frank- a broken clock IS right twice a day, and to give credit where due, despite all of their recent failings the current LPC housing policy is actually pretty good.

Negative to the LPC - spending more money we don't have, and exacerbating overall deficit picture
Negative to the CPC - withholding money based on performance that's outside of municipalities direct span of control risks worsening the problem by hampering infrastructure investment

Beyond that you get into the nuance of the appropriateness of the Feds pulling strings directly on municipalities, and whether or not the intervention should have been more proactive and sooner.

Edited Addition- there's an ironic ideological knot to be untied with the LPC housing accelerator. At the sharp end it's forcing conservative principles onto the municipalities, reducing regulation and enabling free market solutions. But in terms of implementation it's been argued that it's a jurisdictional overreach bypassing the provinces and acting all big government, and it's 4B in deficit spending.
 
Last edited:
Re- differences in CPC/LPC housing policy


If you believe in one there's not much room for extreme criticism of the other, they're pulling the same levers. To be frank- a broken clock IS right twice a day, and to give credit where due, despite all of their recent failings the current LPC housing policy is actually pretty good.

Negative to the LPC - spending more money we don't have, and exacerbating overall deficit picture
Negative to the CPC - withholding money based on performance that's outside of municipalities direct span of control risks worsening the problem by hampering infrastructure investment

Beyond that you get into the nuance of the appropriateness of the Feds pulling strings directly on municipalities, and whether or not the intervention should have been more proactive and sooner.

Edited Addition- there's an ironic ideological knot to be untied with the LPC housing accelerator. At the sharp end it's forcing conservative principles onto the municipalities, reducing regulation and enabling free market solutions. But in terms of implementation it's been argued that it's a jurisdictional overreach bypassing the provinces and acting all big government, and it's 4B in deficit spending.

Bigger problem:

You can't get there from here.

There aren't enough resources available to build shelter for (and supply services to) the number of incomers the Federal government decided to let into the country.
 
Back
Top