FSTO
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 5,871
- Points
- 1,210
The progressives have turned it into an insult as their Hamas (Canada Chapter) supporters have constantly demonstrated.Settler is an insulting term.
The progressives have turned it into an insult as their Hamas (Canada Chapter) supporters have constantly demonstrated.Settler is an insulting term.
Settler is an insulting term.
But I don't really care as who you are is about what you do and not where your grandparents were born.
All hail the Aurignacians!As someone who has Sicanian ancestry, Phonecians and Carthagenians are colonizers and settlers. Same with Greeks, Romans, Moors, Bourbons, Italians and the like.
That's how ridiculous it sounds to call people settlers or colonizers when centuries have elapsed since major human migrations have occured. Indigenous peoples here are unique in that there wasn't a massive extermination/subjugation event along with the colonization/conquering of North America.
As my Iranian friend asked; "How many times have they been invaded?" My ancestors can count at least 4 times.....As someone who has Sicanian ancestry, Phonecians and Carthagenians are colonizers and settlers. Same with Greeks, Romans, Moors, Bourbons, Italians and the like.
That's how ridiculous it sounds to call people settlers or colonizers when centuries have elapsed since major human migrations have occured. Indigenous peoples here are unique in that there wasn't a massive extermination/subjugation event along with the colonization/conquering of North America.
Virtue signalsDude, better be careful where you say that these days. It's clear that your 'allyship' needs some bolstering
$436/day well spent.Dude, better be careful where you say that these days. It's clear that your 'allyship' needs some bolstering
This is from 2021 but still makes sense to me. Progressives really like to slot people into identifiable groups. I guess it just makes it easier to set up death camps and gulags once the movement reaches its apex.
There's been a trend for the past few years in Canada where people introduce themselves as "settlers." Friends I have talked to refer to it as the fancy way of calling themselves white. Is white taboo now?
Opening a conversation with the preface that you are a settler focuses on the past and creates a division right off the bat. It's like saying you're on the winning team — like a Toronto Maple Leafs Fan introducing themselves as the 1967 Stanley Cup champions. (I think he's very funny with that analogy because 1967 is the only thing that Toronto seems to care about)
Guilty feeling white liberal do goodersWho introduces themselves like that ?
I cant imagine the feelings one must have about them self to make that a core identifying factor, to the level that it must be part of an initial introduction.
I hate the term settler. How am I settler when I was born here ?
There are probably some non-settlers who don't like "Indians".
Basically, what everyone wants others to call them is usually some variation of "you special people".
There really is a range of self-reference preference out there. In my limited experience, many seem OK with "Indigenous" or "Aboriginal" (although some literalists say the A word may be more applicable to the first people of Australia), others with a reference to their specific native language term or geographical sub-grouping, while a small, but far from zero, minority say they're Indian because, after all, it's still called the ...And in other areas they are offended when referred to anything but indian.
There really is a range of self-reference preference out there. In my limited experience, many seem OK with "Indigenous" or "Aboriginal" (although some literalists say the A word may be more applicable to the first people of Australia), others with a reference to their specific native language term or geographical sub-grouping, while a small, but far from zero, minority say they're Indian because, after all, it's still called the ...
And let's not forget the same federal department has used the terms "Indian", "Indigenous" (with INAC coming up twice in the rotation, once with the former term, the second time with the latter) and "Aboriginal" in its various names over the past 25 years or so
More than one government has had the chance - both colour teams - so like VAC, if it was easy & cheap to fix, someone would have done it easily & cheaply That’s why the department name changed instead …If only the government had a means to change legislation…
So what is wrong with the term Indian? Apart from the fact that it labels the entire group as belonging on another continent, it is at least as good a name as indigenous. We don't generally refer to folks from India as Indians at least I don't think so. Our folks seem to have hijacked the term for themselves.More than one government has had the chance - both colour teams - so like VAC, if it was easy & cheap to fix, someone would have done it easily & cheaply That’s why the department name changed instead …
Also, from a practical point of view, of all the complaints re: what needs doing in a concrete way to improve living conditions for Canada’s Indigenous people, changing the name of the act is pretty low on the usual lists.So what is wrong with the term Indian? Apart from the fact that it labels the entire group as belonging on another continent, it is at least as good a name as indigenous. We don't generally refer to folks from India as Indians at least I don't think so. Our folks seem to have hijacked the term for themselves.
Meanwhile: A bit more on them "Mass graves and burying kids at night"
At least there were celebrations today. . .
But Canadians aren't happy. The Americans are in a tizzy. The French have gone mad. The Brits are changing guard. And Lebanon is on the brink.therealstory.substack.com
We don’t? That news to me.We don't generally refer to folks from India as Indians at least I don't think so. Our folks seem to have hijacked the term for themselves.