- Reaction score
- 29,637
- Points
- 1,090
Last time they tried it didn't go so well.
Trump administration 2024-2028
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
PrairieFella
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1,099
- Points
- 760
Maybe that's why he's framing them as enemies of the state?
lenaitch
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,077
- Points
- 1,160
Perhaps, but unless he plans to just camp them there until they die (under some kind of authority), I'm not sure what he would plan to do with them. Even being an 'enemy of the state' probably doesn't bring them under military law.
- Reaction score
- 5,159
- Points
- 1,260
Man, I’m glad he’s there to clue us in that VH-60 vs CRJ701 in the landing approach should have been prevented. I’m sure his congressional-mandated Aviation Security Advisory Committee would have considered the event if he hadn’t dismissed them all eight days ago…
Maybe let the investigators investigate and figure out how and why this happened.
- Reaction score
- 1,657
- Points
- 1,260
For reference to the discussion,
Donald Trump and fascism - Wikipedia
"Sure we'll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement."
Louisiana Governor and U.S. Senator Huey Long ( assassinated ).
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
He's simply saying what we're all thinking.
PS: This is a clear indicator that he is making his own social media posts, unlike POTUS 46.
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
You misspelled Criminal Illegal Aliens.
What are we all thinking? Admittedly my inclination is human error but we don’t know much yet.
I don’t think anyone thinks it’s anyone but him doing that lol.
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
People vent shit out loud. "It was a clear night, why didn't 'x' happen?"
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
It's one way to verify that he's pushing and pulling levers. Unlike the last guy
- Reaction score
- 1,657
- Points
- 1,260
Some background on that,
Trump's former aide tells how he dictated tweets
Madeleine Westerhout tells ex-president's trial that he liked capitals and exclamation marks.
www.bbc.com
- Reaction score
- 725
- Points
- 1,010
So let me get this straight… he got a briefing from somebody, who would have said “the investigation is ongoing,” and then he impugned both the crew of the 60 and ATC.
Pretty sure that goes against everything I learned about flight safety and investigations.
… and he’s not supposed to say what everyone is thinking, he’s supposed to lead, and hire other’s that are good at managing.
But is that what everyone is thinking?
Baz only stated what a president generally isn’t. Pretty sure POTUS isn’t a flight safety investigator.
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
I can only speak for myself after seeing the video: that's exactly what I was thinking.
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Points
- 1,040
Pretty sure he didn't claim to be.
- Reaction score
- 725
- Points
- 1,010
So I'm not allowed to give my opinion the fact I have some expectation that our leaders show some leadership, but from a grainy video you not only:
- determined what caused the crash
- determined that everyone is thinking that way (except for a few of us misguided individuals, who think maybe it was something other than somebody is an idiot)
- determined that the president speculating out loud, contrary to normal flight safety and investigation practices which have served us well for 70 years, was a good thing
Got it!
And yes, I am fully aware that the president has ben briefed which means he has better information than us; I'm just not convinced he chooses to understand it, and feel that his natural inclination is to use anything he has to make his angry base even angrier...
So now to find out whether my first inclination (to put you on ignore) was the correct one?