Well, I'm glad the anti-racists came out to confront the far-right and hope the government amend the law enough to do something about those far-rightists who spread misinformation.
British authorities said Thursday they were preparing for the possibility of further unrest, even as they applauded the efforts of anti-racism campaigners and police who largely stifled a threatened wave of far-right demonstrations overnight.
www.ctvnews.ca
Oh boy...
In addition to Mr. Ricky Jones telling a crowd to "slit the throats of protestors", the North American media has done its usual nonsense.
Not everybody protesting is far right or racist.
A majority of them are just normal people who are sick & tired of what they believe is a huge double standard in terms of policing and other services that their tax dollars pay for.
Should someone who entered the UK illegally be entitled to 1600 pounds a month, and stay for free in a hotel room?
Should they also get free healthcare despite not paying into the system?
Should they be able to commit crimes and not fear any real legal repercussions, while citizens born in the UK would be arrested & charged?
The whole reason why the UK
voted to leave the EU is because they didn't want someone in Brussels deciding the laws in their lands, or dictating to them how many refugees they
have to take...
And yet here they are saddled with hundreds of thousands of people that didn't enter legally, don't respect their laws, and in many ways try to change the social and political landscape to look more like the lands they fled from.
NONE of this is 'far right' or 'racist'...
Look at the scene in London from yesterday. Do you honestly think that ALL of those people are racists and far right nutjobs?
They look like pretty ordinary people to me!
...
The UK government couldn't have handled this situation any worse than they are right now.
They've chosen to ignore their own citizen's concerns, and instead seem to have sided with the people who aren't even there legally instead.
And they've applied their hate speech laws & online censorship laws in ways that are extremely unreasonable.
As it stands now, a 55yo woman has been taken into custody for sharing something online that contained 'inaccurate information' - and she's not the only one
Who's to say her post contained inaccurate information? What about if the media posts something that contains inaccurate information? Who decides what's accurate and not accurate when people are simply sharing video footage of events in their area?
An arbiter of truth?
There will be shitheads that stir up trouble, there always are. And like usual their antics will taint the message that the bigger movement is trying to communicate.
That will happen on both sides, like it always does.
But this has been a long, slow march coming & was entirely preventable is the government had used some common sense in terms of its spending, and actually listened to the citizens & taxpayers of the country.
Heck if the government even directed the police to enforce the laws of the land consistently across the board, this may have been preventable
But no. Common sense, accountability to the citizenry, consistent application of the laws of the land, and responsible use of taxpayer dollars were all thrown out the window & those in power chose to treat their citizens with contempt instead...
We'll see how far this ends up going, but their government deserves the kind of reckoning only an army of pissed off citizens can bring with it
UK (VINnews)-UK authorities have arrested a 55-year-old woman in connection with a social media post deemed to contain “inaccurate information” and allegedly intended to “stir up racial hatred.” The arrest, reported by Sky News, is raising concerns about freedom of speech and the legal...
vinnews.com
Statistics released by the Metropolitan Police show more than 850 people in London were detained under the controversial Communications Act last year
www.dailymail.co.uk