Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 13,000
- Points
- 1,160
Start supporting Roshel by buying their current fleet to fill some of our holes and guarantee them we spend X amount buy a purpose designed 4x4 AFV from them in the 1.5ton cargo range. If you think anyone is going to build another full AFV here without that insured support, them your just dreaming. You got to crawl before you can walk and run. If we continue to buy every year, eventually they have a better protected version designed and built here or a licenced designed built by them here.To a point, but keep in mind nearly every single western AFV that wasn't captured by Russia, was able to be recovered and repaired for use, and all the crews but one Challenger 2 crew survived the engagement that took out their vehicle.
Russia on the other hand has been losing crews and vehicles at unprecedented rates (well unprecedented for the last 70 years). Quantity isn't it's own form of Quality anymore.
Massive - and unarmored.
I would suggest that for a practical larger scale conflict that Canada needs to be able to create armored vehicles that aren't armored by afterthought of throwing additional armor on a vehicle after it was designed - but working with a manufacturer to come up with purpose built vehicles that incorporate an armor package from day 1 - of which some of the armor package is removable when not needed (but the chassis is purpose built as an armored vehicle).
I would also suggest that Canada find an OEM they can work with for a fleet of Tracked Armored Vehicles, including Tracked Armored Logistics vehicles.