Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 8,846
- Points
- 1,040
Note that the culprit is government inaction on climate change, not relentless predictions of apocalyptic outcomes.
Misinformation about solar power and wind farms is leading local governments across the country to restrict — or even reject — renewable energy projects. It's a threat to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, researchers warn.
They should look into the effects of what’s coming out of some of the existing power plants.Misinformation is derailing renewable energy projects across the United States
The spread of misinformation about solar and wind energy is leading some states and counties to restrict or even reject projects. Researchers say it's a threat to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.www.npr.org
Pure misdirection by the grits. Nothing to do with emergency services. The government is doing nothing about it except telling the telecoms to sort it out amongst themselves, then report to the Minister for permission to launch. For a government to dictate how a private business must operate and with who, is wrong. We can tell them to operate safely. We can tell them how to pay taxes and licenses. What we shouldn't be doing is telling them how to run their business or who to partner with.In view of the clamouring of the government/expert community over one major outage in part of the telecommunications playground, I look forward to the intensity of the denunciations and scapegoating when shortages arise in the energy playground.
To an extent I agree with you but when two major players become one basically giving us two poor choices maybe then the government needs to step in. AT&T was broken up because it had a virtual monopoly on telecom stuff in the US.Pure misdirection by the grits. Nothing to do with emergency services. The government is doing nothing about it except telling the telecoms to sort it out amongst themselves, then report to the Minister for permission to launch. For a government to dictate how a private business must operate and with who, is wrong. We can tell them to operate safely. We can tell them how to pay taxes and licenses. What we shouldn't be doing is telling them how to run their business or who to partner with.
In country the size of Canada with our small population, I am not sure how one gets “European priced” celphone coverage with 4 (plus) national carriers duplicating towers and infrastructure from coast to coast to coast…The US basically has 4 major companies dominant (subscriber base) in wireless, with the fifth very far behind. A much larger customer base is supporting their infrastructure. I'm not really convinced we need 4 (Bell, Rogers, Telus, Shaw), let alone a fifth or more.
Usually, the policy makers find an energy company scapegoat for failing to deliver energy (in whatever form) that their rules prevented the company from delivering in the first place. Then, they double down on more stupid rules, so…It doesn't have anything to do directly with climate issues. I'm looking ahead to when the first major screwups over energy policy happen, and the finger-pointing starts. (I suppose the first major screwups are already happening, in some countries. The question is whether we act on the horrible warnings or become one.)
They are nice, but you get what you pay for. Get an air tight model with really heavy steel construction- it saves you wood.Yep. Now, to find a woodburning stove and refurbish it and set it aside in the garage...
saves you wood
Clever. Verrrrry.But if it's cold I want to burn as much as possible to increase the CO2 content and warm things up...