Sigs Pig said:Hi all,
Is this the same Scott Gilbert that ran in the 2006 election?
http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes2006/riding/134/
Says he got 111 votes as a Commie!
ME
twistedcables said:I LOVED that one!
January 14, 2009
Ryan Monkman
Dear Editor - I have become so frustrated with the Central Student Association at the University of Guelph that it has become difficult for me to express my anger and disappointment with them.
Last week, on one of their websites, The Cannon, they posted an editorial whose headline referred to retired Canadian general and chief of defence staff Rick Hillier -- who received the Lincoln Alexander Outstanding Leader Award at the university yesterday -- as a "warmonger."
The editorial, written by former Communist party candidate Scott Gilbert, provided zero evidence for this outrageous claim but rather tossed around some out-of-context quotes from the retired general.
Its focal point was that under Hillier, the Canadian Forces went from being a peacekeeping force to a voice for torture.
For starters, Canadian soldiers are specifically ordered not to torture prisoners. To say there was a directive from the former chief of defence staff to do so is horribly insulting to our men and women who have given their lives for the security of the region.
Secondly, Gilbert argued that Hillier refused to extend the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the people of Afghanistan.
I believe it is absolutely necessary for people everywhere to have basic human rights, but to impose Canadian law on a foreign land is the most western-centric and hubristic idea I have ever heard.
Finally, I agree we are a nation seeking peace; unfortunately, it is not enough to wish it so.
In order to be peacekeepers, we must first be peacemakers. Pacifism is not peacefulness.
To write an editorial using made up facts and out-of-context quotes with the sole purpose of humiliating an honoured Canadian general is wrong.
Gilbert has done this university and his country a great disservice.
As we saw with their actions last year toward a pro-life group on campus, the Central Student Association will not allow any opinions in contrast to their Castroist agenda.
-- Ryan Monkman, Guelph
Editor's note: A notice on The Cannon website says the Scott Gilbert column "has been removed while The Cannon operating committee investigates its appropriateness." The notice continues: "As with other writing that appears on this website, this editorial does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Central Student Association and the Guelph Campus Co-op who jointly administer The Cannon."
Yrys said:If the laws are the same as in Québec, you could also go to the student union to ask for your money back...
leroi said:6) Write about the irony of these two avowed "communist, peace activists" hurling around words like militarism while exploiting/appropriating an artifact of WW1 as their symbol. Also, the irony of them talking about peace using war/battle language. Consider this ad from their front page soliciting submissions: "Help us to load the Cannon. Write. Shoot. Contribute."
Tommy said:I simply find it Ironic that a bunch of Far left Commie Hippie anti-war, pacifists named their paper AFTER A GUN! ???
Tommy said:I simply find it Ironic that a bunch of Far left Commie Hippie anti-war, pacifists named their paper AFTER A GUN! ???
wildman0101 said:murcury,,,
ive worn that shoulder ssf flash mate,,, and who be you???
ive served with this brigade,,, as it was reformed in 1977
after the original... im sure youve heard of it ...it was the devils
brigade ww2... i dont see anything on your profile that gives
you the right to even falsh it ... i served with one of the
regiments that was in the original,,, 8ch.... check out the
attachments ive sent you...
regards,,,
scoty b
Kirkhill said:A: They co-opted the paper. It has been around along time and the Cannon itself (as university bulletin board) has been around a lot longer. I attended UniGoo before David Akin.
B: There is absolutely no conflict in the mind of the Marxist between opposing war and supporting violent revolution. Or for that matter supporting violent suppression of dissent while opposing the violent suppression of dissent.
Means and Ends. They's screwed up.
leroi said:Piper,
If you can find the time, the next Ontarion submission deadline is this coming Monday at 1:00 pm. The controversy raised so many issues that could be explored:
1) Lack of editorial oversight, journalistic ethics, and libel at the cannon: point out that in an online medium, things cannot be erased. By changing "war criminal" to "war monger" the ad hominem was reinforced--not negated. Information cannot be made to disappear.
2) Why the campus communist party has their own online newspaper and the rest of the undergraduate body share one. (And, why student's are paying for two.)
3) Fiscal Restraint: a proposal to collapse the cannon and incorporate some of it's better features (like the share board) into the more democratic Ontarion.
4) Content: deconstruct Gilbert's ad hominem diatribe by placing General Hillier's comments back into the correct political/social/historical context. Provide examples from the Afghan mission.
5) Write about how you feel about General Hillier and what his Leadership award meant to you personally. Linked with how upsetting it was to see him viciously attacked .
6) Write about the irony of these two avowed "communist, peace activists" hurling around words like militarism while exploiting/appropriating an artifact of WW1 as their symbol. Also, the irony of them talking about peace using war/battle language. Consider this ad from their front page soliciting submissions: "Help us to load the Cannon. Write. Shoot. Contribute."
The written word seems to get noticed around here. I'm sure you're busy but even a couple of well written paragraphs would be excellent.
PM inbound.