Do we need an Army Wiki?

[big bad john]

I like the idea of a Army.ca wiki with security based on Mike's idea of it based on the number of posts, sort of like the entry minimum to the chat room.  I would participate in contributing and in monitoring if needed. 

Allan has a brilliant idea for the Armour School wiki.  But will it pass security?  It never would in the UK.

 

[couchcommander]

A CFwiki ran by army.ca, I should have specified.

 

[clasper]

On that note, a study found wikipedia to be just as accurate as Britannica.

http://news.com.com/Study+Wikipedia+as+accurate+as+Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

Nature's study had some rather serious flaws in methodology.  Britannica's rather vicious response is here:
http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf

 

[couchcommander]

The Britannica response is overinflated and dripping of corporate marketing teams.

Nature has a point by point rebuttal of it.

http://www.nature.com/nature/britannica/eb_advert_response_final.pdf

 

[techie]

http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Or, hover over the information tab at the top of this web page and it is the first option "wiki".
I personally have not added to it, although i would like to, but i dont feel i have the knowledge or experance to enter the information i want to enter.

EDIT- previous post was deleted. someone couldnt find the wiki.