lenaitch
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,504
- Points
- 1,160
I suspect the reporters chasing the leaders around don't see the distinction. I also suspect the general public doesn't either.I'm surprised a reporter hasn't asked the question yet.
I suspect the reporters chasing the leaders around don't see the distinction. I also suspect the general public doesn't either.I'm surprised a reporter hasn't asked the question yet.
DS's problem though is she acts like a O&G lobbiest more than anything, and her policies cater more to rural albertans. Current scandal nit withstanding, she has her own problems with the urban, rural divide as the cities all are swinging to the NDP. At current rate she will likely lose the 2027 election. Pushing attacks on ottawa is just a distraction for her, and for Pierre it's an annoyance that could mess with his campaign.I can appreciate her, DS, wanting to put Albertans first, but she is submarining the prospective PM who would help do that.
.
I suspect the reporters chasing the leaders around don't see the distinction. I also suspect the general public doesn't either.
What makes you say that?To the surprise of absolutely no one, tripling down. It's almost like she's trying to annihilate any chance the CPC might have.
It is better for the United States to have actual solid allies running in Canada than to have some of the schmucks that have been running Canada over the past few years.”
Brookfield Asset Management is been a holding in my RSP for years - because of its diversification, its well paying, consistent, growing dividend and because its very well run. I look forward to many, many years of above average returns on my investments in the years to come.I'll bet the assets included various Canadian pension funds. Those appear to be the investment capital Brookfield prefers, is pension funds.
There are probably a ton of investments, put together by Carney, that will run for many years. He cannot extradite himself from those deals as they will be providing him dividends until the projects are complete.
When the US is openly saying that they would like to annex Canada and in both words and actions they are using "economic force" to destroy the Canadian economy by eliminating any trade links between our countries by repatriating all cross-border industry to the United States then who is it that is being hostile?Would it be better for Canada if we remained hostile to the US?
You sure about that?
The US. Would it be better for Canadians to keep that hostility going or try to dial it back where possible?When the US is openly saying that they would like to annex Canada and in both words and actions they are using "economic force" to destroy the Canadian economy by eliminating any trade links between our countries by repatriating all cross-border industry to the United States then who is it that is being hostile?
Edit...what Fabius said.
Depends on how the pension is structured. Ask employees of failed companies whose pension funds were not "at arm's length".The 'gold standard' in pensions is the defined benefit.
Not necessarily. A DB plan without unlimited government liability (backing) can still fail, particularly if it isn't actuarially sound. If it's actuarially sound, then the same contributions to a DC plan (or other investments) could likely achieve a similar outcome, with the added benefit that an employee who loses his "bet" that he's going to live long enough to collect it all can still pass it along in his estate. If a DC plan overperforms, the employee benefits. If a DB plan overperforms, the plan retains the extra earnings unless there is some sort of provision for bonus payments (which would be a risk most plans would steer away from). If a DC plan underperforms, the employee loses. If a DB plan underperforms, the employee may or may not lose depend on whether there is some backer with unlimited liability. Saying a DC plan is "tier 2" is like saying private investments are "tier 2".The defined contribution is definitely a 'tier 2' pension.
Well this is somewhat awkward.
Alt: https://archive.ph/8KURJ![]()
'Deeply hypocritical’: Pierre Poilievre slammed ‘illegal border crossers,’ but his own relative crossed and stayed ⋆ The Breach
Anaida Poilievre’s uncle lived undocumented in Canada and received help from her and an MP. The Conservative leader has said such individuals should be ‘tracked down’ and ‘deported’breachmedia.ca
Small ball people
Waiting for Carney to try and duck the two national debates due to the Trump emergency.