Except Biden forgets to leave your head....in fact he forgets a lot....Kinda like Biden for some folks now that they've finally gotten over Obama.
Let me get this straight: if it's bad, it's because Biden is a senile old man, but if it's good, it's because "Obama" . Got it.Kinda like Biden for some folks now that they've finally gotten over Obama.
Biden is obama's third term.You don't need to be obsessed with Biden to laugh at him daily over his daily escapades. It's like grabbing the newspaper and going straight to your favourite comic. Start your day with a chuckle
Nope.
Not within an order of magnitude. People laugh at Biden; most people seem to be too angry to laugh at Trump.
Some just cry at both, and their devoted followers.
I guess the chuckles you got as reactions to your post are for the FBI. They employed him for a long time as a confidential human source. You can read about his exploits in the DOJ court filing linked here. It's from a July 2023 sealed grand jury indictment that was recently unsealed. The question is why the FBI had this Form 1023 in had for 4 years and never acted on it. They even authorized him to participate in criminal activity during his work. He was admonished several times as can be seen.
DOJ Document
The term âadmonishedâ is likely not a negative or pejorative term in this context. Part of confidential source handling is going through a routine each time thereâs an interaction to remind them of what they can, canât, and mustnât do, and reminding them they must be truthful. I donât interpret that portion of the allegation as suggesting they had grounds to believe he was previously untruthful and that he was âadmonishedâ as a result. Note that they use the term to describe how he was briefed the very first time he was used.
Thanks for that explanation.
www.newsweek.com
www.nbcnewyork.com
They must figure that Russia, Russia, Russia worked so well before that they can recycle the scenarios and allegations and use them as a defence instead of an allegation.
If you recall back in the late spring / early summer, this FBI FD-1023 was supposed to be a Very Big Deal and was the cornerstone of allegations levied by house republicans. It now appears that the entire thing was a fabrication, quite possibly at the behest of Russian intelligence. The house Republicans appear to have been completely played by a Russian foreign actor interference op, to the extent that theyâve tried to move towards impeaching a president over it. Itâs completely fair game for those who were on the opposite political end of these allegations to be loudly pointing out that it was complete bullshit, and wasnât fact checked at all before the house Republicans made a great deal of noise and ran with it.They must figure that Russia, Russia, Russia worked so well before that they can recycle the scenarios and allegations and use them as a defence instead of an allegation.
After watching the RRR gymnastics by the democrats, FBI, DOJ, CIA, et al, over the last 8 years, I'm not inclined to believe anything. And simply because the trusted, productive CI, that got everything rolling has allegedly turned for the Russians, does not convince me of anything. The fact that biden himself, amongst other of the ususal suspects, came out calling for an end to the impeachment inquiry because of this guy being arrested only adds to the stink. And they started screaming before the lock turned on this guy's cell. Way too convenient for my measure, especially since we know lots of the lies told by clinton and her minions were based on staged incidents. We also know this administration loves shutting people up and making them inaccessible by jailing them. It's almost their go to solution.
How the tables have turned. Once upon a time it was the FBI and CIA that were played by fabrications, injected mainly by people working for Hillary Clinton's campaign, which ended up reaching out through Steele to Russians and greedily accepted what was given. There were also their (investigators) own tenuous wishful creations, amplified by too much attention paid to what they thought was militating evidence (including hearsay) and too little attention paid to mitigating evidence. Their ultimate report (Mueller's) conceded that insufficient evidence existed to charge the principal target (Trump). With delicious irony, Mueller's report editorialized on the subject of "not exonerated" which became a rallying cry for partisans at the time, some of whom subsequently expressed vexation and outrage that a later report (Hur's) found evidence of crimes by Biden, but explained why no charges would be brought. Most amusingly, Mueller's report was also part of the impetus for an impeachment - Trump's first.
Except when people in essence say "you have no proof" to set a bar to be cleared for starting an investigation into allegations, but only when it is politically advantageous. Anyone who can't consistently apply standards for what are and are not reasonable triggers for investigations is intellectually or ethically deficient.
