- Reaction score
- 7,476
- Points
- 1,160
http://saab.com/air/gripen-fighter-system/gripen/gripen/
What happens if Her Majesty's Canadian Government pulls a CF-5 and delivers 80 or so JAS-39s to the RCAF whether they want them or not?
Thoughts on impact on the 30 to 50 BCAD budget for maintaining a Fighter Cap over Canada for the next 30 to 50 years?
Thoughts on the impact on Foreign Affairs - US Relations, participation in international operations, with or without US Intelligence support and logistics?
Thoughts on the impact of Quebec Aerospace Inc of Montreal - gaining the assembly of Gripens and supply of parts to the international Gripen fleet while losing the supply of parts and technologies (like trainers) to the F-35 fleet?
My sense is that the economic impact on the military budet will be marginal and the NORAD piece of the puzzle will be met.
Internationally relations with the US will become a bit more difficult to manage technically resulting in more time and space being necessary for Canada to join in US operations. And that is probably a good thing as far as the Liberals are concerned. Jean Chretien never liked standing solutions as they didn't give him the wiggle room that he preferred.
It also means fewer Libyas and Iraqs but more Baltics and Romanias - Show the flag.
In Montreal it means a long term loss of business - but one that is only felt in the boardrooms - and a short term gain of political announcements and hiring. The fact that those jobs will be gone in 5 years time once the fleet is built is probably politically immaterial Another big ticket project will be announced in time for the next election.
So.... if you get stuck with these things, how could you use them? What couldn't you do with them?
What happens if Her Majesty's Canadian Government pulls a CF-5 and delivers 80 or so JAS-39s to the RCAF whether they want them or not?
Thoughts on impact on the 30 to 50 BCAD budget for maintaining a Fighter Cap over Canada for the next 30 to 50 years?
Thoughts on the impact on Foreign Affairs - US Relations, participation in international operations, with or without US Intelligence support and logistics?
Thoughts on the impact of Quebec Aerospace Inc of Montreal - gaining the assembly of Gripens and supply of parts to the international Gripen fleet while losing the supply of parts and technologies (like trainers) to the F-35 fleet?
My sense is that the economic impact on the military budet will be marginal and the NORAD piece of the puzzle will be met.
Internationally relations with the US will become a bit more difficult to manage technically resulting in more time and space being necessary for Canada to join in US operations. And that is probably a good thing as far as the Liberals are concerned. Jean Chretien never liked standing solutions as they didn't give him the wiggle room that he preferred.
It also means fewer Libyas and Iraqs but more Baltics and Romanias - Show the flag.
In Montreal it means a long term loss of business - but one that is only felt in the boardrooms - and a short term gain of political announcements and hiring. The fact that those jobs will be gone in 5 years time once the fleet is built is probably politically immaterial Another big ticket project will be announced in time for the next election.
So.... if you get stuck with these things, how could you use them? What couldn't you do with them?