What narrative? Not my fault that you can’t see the difference.Sure, keep up the mental gymnastics to satisfy your narrative.
What narrative? Not my fault that you can’t see the difference.Sure, keep up the mental gymnastics to satisfy your narrative.
He’s a compulsive liar, and he surrounds himself with suckers who believe it. Why would that stop now?
Statistically, how does that even work? Or is he being “sarcastic” again?
How about jobs that require security clearances that mean you must be a US Citizen, like…oh, I don’t know…most of the US military and federal govt?
Hey, that’s “losers and suckers” to youHe’s a compulsive liar, and he surrounds himself with suckers who believe it. Why would that stop now?
Or, how are they “welfare queens” but still taking all of the jobs? The mind boggles!
How bad are you at your job, if an immigrant who refuses to work steals it?Schrödinger's immigrant: simultaneously refuses to work and steals your job.
He basically confirms bias for his followers…and they fall for it.
Statistically, how does that even work? Or is he being “sarcastic” again?
How about jobs that require security clearances that mean you must be a US Citizen, like…oh, I don’t know…most of the US military and federal govt?
Or, how are they “welfare queens” but still taking all of the jobs? The mind boggles!
He isn't the only one that does that... but he is the most obvious.He basically confirms bias for his followers…and they fall for it.
The question is why he says stuff like this, or the “women won’t need to think about abortion” post, or the “eating the pets” remark.He isn't the only one that does that... but he is the most obvious.
You're making the mistake of assuming that the people who will be swung one way or the other care about his inane ramblings. You're also "nut picking" the oddest things he says, and ignoring the things he says that actually resonate with voters.The question is why he says stuff like this, or the “women won’t need to think about abortion” post, or the “eating the pets” remark.
Then doubling down when fact-checked.
I mean, as someone with a 50-50 shot at either being POTUS or in the inside of a cell, I would think that he would want to say fewer things that turn him off potential supporters.
His pets remark is a viral meme (and not in a good way), and I’m sure that telling women that they “won't need to think about abortion” because it’s back to the States (which may or may not allow it) is a great way to gain the support of half of the electorate.
Fair, but that’s a total package. Also, given his history of stiffing folks he was supposed to be paying, turning on his supporters when/if they had any hint of “disloyalty”, I have a deep suspicion on whether he would actually follow through on those things that resonate with voters.You're making the mistake of assuming that the people who will be swung one way or the other care about his inane ramblings. You're also "nut picking" the oddest things he says, and ignoring the things he says that actually resonate with voters.
There’s one other point with Trump specifically though. He is at least partially running (if not his whole point of running) to prevent being thrown in jail.I think he's a raging idiot, but I also don't presume to know how the average American perceives him vs the other option. Remember, a vote "for" him can just as easily be a vote "against" Harris. Kind of like how a vote "for" Trudeau can simply be a vote "against" PP...
I know we are mixing posts/forums, but every argument for voting LPC/Trudeau can be use for voting Trump/GOP.
Recently I've noticed that on Twitter, Musk has been retweeting done if the more extreme/aggressive takes on the diresness of the election, such as that electing Trump is the only way to save America, and that if Harris is elected it will be the literal end of democracy, etc. He's been echoing Trump support for a while now, but these more extreme posts seem more recent, and it got me wondering. I wonder if he TOO is worried about something in his closet and knows that Trump will support/pardon him, while Harris's DOJ would see him in jail (for whatever it is that's in his closet).There’s one other point with Trump specifically though. He is at least partially running (if not his whole point of running) to prevent being thrown in jail.
Too be honest Musk seems almost desperate. You do have to wonder if the door to his closet is about to pop open ?Recently I've noticed that on Twitter, Musk has been retweeting done if the more extreme/aggressive takes on the diresness of the election, such as that electing Trump is the only way to save America, and that if Harris is elected it will be the literal end of democracy, etc. He's been echoing Trump support for a while now, but these more extreme posts seem more recent, and it got me wondering. I wonder if he TOO is worried about something in his closet and knows that Trump will support/pardon him, while Harris's DOJ would see him in jail (for whatever it is that's in his closet).
It may also be that he wants a monopoly on EVs. A Trump administration with Musk as an advisor certainly could enable that.Too be honest Musk seems almost desperate. You do have to wonder if the door to his closet is about to pop open ?
I think that COA is well back in the rear view mirror.It may also be that he wants a monopoly on EVs. A Trump administration with Musk as an advisor certainly could enable that.
Just what every boy billionaire wants his very own country !Republicans in swing states say they see scant signs of groups door-knocking for Trump
Republican activists in swing states say they’ve seen little sign of the teams tasked with knocking on doors and turning out infrequent voters on behalf of Donald Trump.apnews.com
In the “take the payment and run” theme, that is diabolical