Eggs are still 15$ a carton I believe.Until it hits their wallets hard - real hard - they will support him.
Eggs are still 15$ a carton I believe.Until it hits their wallets hard - real hard - they will support him.
Wait until July 3rd, before the kick off of summer vacations, if gas is still under 4$/gallon outside of California and they can still afford their beer (aluminum tariff), hotdogs/buns and their beach rental, they won't rise up.Americans voted for the wrecking ball. I’m sure they will tolerate some chaos and price fluctuations as Trump does his thing.
I suppose they approve his deeds more than they disapprove of his misdeeds. There's no "this one thing" rule that applies to people.Trump got a majority of the electorate to support him. And they still do.
Trump's 51st State rhetoric will continue until he gets what he is looking for - a secure northern flank. A northern flank secured against conventional and hybrid threats from China and Russia (and China is his biggest concern)
China is his biggest concern.
Russia is a fading concern.
He is looking at the reverse of Kissinger's problem. Kissinger wanted to keep China out of the arms of a powerful Russia. Trump wants to keep Russia out of the arms of a powerful China.
Russia is a manageable threat in the arctic. Vlad inherited a weak and rusting Soviet Union and turned it into a weaker Russia. China sees an opening to exploit Russia's Siberian weakness to gain access to both Siberia and the Arctic Ocean. First as a joint-venture partner and, in future, as sole owner.
Thus, I believe, why he wants to keep Vlad in power and placated. And that may mean giving ground on Ukraine....
....
But....
...
Trump has another card to play. Europe/NATO/JEF. Trump can withdraw the US from the NATO commitment and the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO while, at the same time, getting Ukraine NATO-esque coverage by becoming part of JEF.
Denmark, Greenland, Iceland, UK, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania bottle up the Northern and Baltic Fleets and, together with the US and Canada, secure the Arctic. Those countries have already offered guarantees to Poland and Ukraine. And the UK has its own independent nuclear deterrent.
Those countries plus the Weimar Group* (I swear that the foreign affairs geeks spend their days trolling) are the people that Ukraine is expecting to put boots on the ground, aircraft in the skies and ships in the water to defend their sovereignty.
Instead of SHAPE and VII Corps on the Inter-German border, with the US President having to fret over exchanging the good people of Peoria for the good people of Bonn, the Europeans will be manning the border and the Brits and the French will be fretting tactical nuclear exchanges with Vlad.
And Trump takes one pace to the rear, puts some time and space into the Article 5 debates and can, conceivably, reserve his thunder for when Vlad gets serious and actually employs his tac nukes against Europe.
*Weimar Group+
![]()
Weimar+ Statement by Germany, France, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, the European External Action Service and the European Commission
Joint Statement by Germany, France, Poland, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, the European External Action Service and the European Commission.www.gov.uk
....
I think Trump and Hesgeth are absolutely transparent in telling NATO, including Canada, that there is not enough money in the American kitty to manage both China in Asia and Russia in Europe. I also think that Russia is sufficiently reduced that Europe should be able to stabilize the situation indefinitely from its own resources. If they want to push Russia out of Crimea and risk a wider war then that would be up to them
The centerpiece seems to be to make a “Kissinger-in-reverse” play. In other words, the Trump administration could be attempting to peel Russia away from China. If this is the case, it assumes that Washington will be able to induce Moscow to loosen its relations with Beijing and hew more closely to the US in exchange for breaking out of isolation, the lifting of sanctions, and accepting its territorial gains in Ukraine.
That's it, I'm dropping my gloves !
Elon Musk is not a real person.MAGA still building a narrative for Anschluss
Even my American friends who lean GOP are a bit weirded out by the obsession...MAGA still building a narrative for Anschluss
He is so lifelike though.Elon Musk is not a real person.
It’s almost as if we are living rent free in their heads…Even my American friends who lean GOP are a bit weirded out by the obsession...
I'm not sure America or Canada could survive an actual annexation attempt. Bob and Sally from London are essentially indistinguishable from Joe and Jane from Detroit. I'm not sure Americans would put up with the increased security required to keep people, who are essentially indistinguishable from them, from doing bad things.
Canada has about the population of 2001 Iraq and Afghanistan combined, if even a small fraction of the population decides to go "Snow Taliban", America would be in for a brutal and pointless fight.
MAGA still building a narrative for Anschluss
He’s making predictions about Tesla’s future sales volumes.Can you tariff something that doesn't exist ?
There's no difference. Cut the Democratic voters some slack but 70-something million voted for the lunatic and the over 100 million holier-than-thou fence riders chose not to vote. They deserve the international scorn.I could wish people would stop mixing up "Trump" and "Americans".
We've covered this ground in the context of Canadian elections, and the same general principles apply in the US. People have multitudes of reasons for casting votes "for" one thing, including the desire to cast votes "against" another. In politics there is nothing resembling the "completeness" property of real numbers: there are few - often only two - choices on a ballot.There's no difference. Cut the Democratic voters some slack but 70-something million voted for the lunatic and the over 100 million holier-than-thou fence riders chose not to vote. They deserve the international scorn.
And ~170 million people either failed to vote, or voted for a known agent of chaos, probable agent of Russia, and reflexive autocrat or against a pair of candidates who were neither of those things.We've covered this ground in the context of Canadian elections, and the same general principles apply in the US. People have multitudes of reasons for casting votes "for" one thing, including the desire to cast votes "against" another. In politics there is nothing resembling the "completeness" property of real numbers: there are few - often only two - choices on a ballot.
And ~170 million people either failed to vote, or voted for a known agent of chaos, probable agent of Russia, and reflexive autocrat or against a pair of candidates who were neither of those things.
Those 170 million are to blame for everything Trump and his gang inflict on the US, Canada, and the rest of the world. Whatever inane reason they might have for not voting Harris/Walz is meaningless in that context. Let them feel the hatred, disgust, and condemnation they have earned.
100% agreed. Liberals love a distraction.I maintain if only Canadians would be as upset with their own compromised government as they are with mean Trump, we might actually get somewhere.
Got anything solid or just your opinion?probable agent of Russia
So they exercised their democratic right and your having a fit?And ~170 million people either failed to vote, or voted for