• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

"Toronto 18" terrorists: Arrest/court/aftermath

Lord how the BS is flowing already.

The perps were identified starting in 2002 due to their activities on certain radical web sites, long befor we stepped up our mission in Afghanistan.

Entrapment occurs when the police plant an idea which would not otherwise have occured to the perp; since they were plotting away in 2002, it seems clear that "entrapment" is a very huge streach.

As for those calling for deportment; these people are Canadians (although obviously not citizens in any real sense of the word). Perhaps a special holding facility could be built on Hans Island to accomodate them. If they want a warmer climate, I understand there is an appropriate place in Cuba run by the USA, and perhaps Castro could be persuaded to house them on the "Island of Pines", which unlike Gitmo has real documentation of torture and abuse (not that the press wants to spend any time investigating that.......)
 
It looks like entrapment vs. sting operation with the (fake) ammonium nitrate is going to be their main defense and probably the big public debate.  Although these guys have been under surveillance for 2 years so I'm sure there is a mountain of evidence against them and I don't doubt the RCMP's ability to mount a proper and legal sting operation.

It sucks that the Muslim community is coming under fire for this, I haven't seen them up in arms to defend these guys at all.
 
a_majoor said:
Lord how the BS is flowing already.

The perps were identified starting in 2002 due to their activities on certain radical web sites, long befor we stepped up our mission in Afghanistan.

Entrapment occurs when the police plant an idea which would not otherwise have occured to the perp; since they were plotting away in 2002, it seems clear that "entrapment" is a very huge streach.

As for those calling for deportment; these people are Canadians (although obviously not citizens in any real sense of the word). Perhaps a special holding facility could be built on Hans Island to accomodate them. If they want a warmer climate, I understand there is an appropriate place in Cuba run by the USA, and perhaps Castro could be persuaded to house them on the "Island of Pines", which unlike Gitmo has real documentation of torture and abuse (not that the press wants to spend any time investigating that.......)

Why would the press want to report on that.  It would not do anything to make the war on terror any better or worse. ::)

Secondly,  Of course the BS is flying, any lawyer worth his salts has to start the conspiracy/brainwash/us vs them/ smoke screen early and maybe he can get them declared insane or temporary insanity over a 2 year period.  It is sad the lawyers are jumping all over this to defend these people but anything to get their face on television/ name in print/ voice on the radio.  This is not to say they are guilty I will let a court decide that.  But by thunder if they get off on a technicality or because they felt overwhelmed with the state of the world S@IT I am going to loss it.  It is hard enough for the police to do the job being asked of them to stop these people to have them walk off Scott free on some bull S&it loop hole.

If the cops did their job right (which I am hoping happened, 2 yr gig some big bucks there you know this was micro-managed) And the Crown does their job we should all breath easy.  The only problem may lie in the judge could be some bleeding heart liberal who thinks that it may be better if these poor people go back to their own community to get rehabilitation to learn to adjust to "Western Culture"

Their has to be a fine line between multicultural and respecting the laws of a set society.  But this is a grey area for another day.

Majoor hit it right on.  Hans Island sounds nice especially around Jan with a tent for prison, no guards just a tent and a fishing poll.



 
Excerpts from two good pieces today:

1) Christie Blatchford in the Globe (full text not online);
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v4/sub/MarketingPage?user_URL=http://www.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FLAC.20060605.BLATCH05%2FTPStory%2FTPComment%2FOntario%2F&ord=9078737&brand=theglobeandmail&redirect_reason=2&denial_reasons=none&force_login=false

'Ignoring the biggest elephant in the room

I drove back from yesterday's news conference at the Islamic Foundation of Toronto in the northeastern part of the city, but honestly, I could have just as easily floated home in the sea of horse manure [elephant dung, surely - MC] emanating from the building.

So frequent were the bald reassurances that faith and religion had nothing -- nothing, you understand -- to do with the alleged homegrown terrorist plot recently busted open by Canadian police and security forces, that for a few minutes afterward, I wondered if perhaps it was a vile lie of the mainstream press or a fiction of my own demented brain that the 17 accused young men are all, well, Muslims.

But no. I have checked. They are all Muslims...

Barely two days after the nighttime raids...the great Canadian self-delusion machine was up and running at full throttle...

Such is the state of ignoring the biggest, fattest elephant in the room in this country that at one point Chief Blair actually bragged -- this in answer to a question from the floor -- "I would remind you that there was not one single reference made by law enforcement to Muslim or Muslim community" at the big post-arrest news conference on Saturday.

Indeed, law-enforcement types there took enormous pains to say just the opposite: The arrested men are from a diverse variety of backgrounds ("They're students, they're employed, they're unemployed" one official said, which is akin to running the gamut from A to oh, C); they come from all parts of Canadian society; blah, blah, blah...

But what came clear at that meeting yesterday [at the Islamic Foundation], which was an odd mix of community venting and news conference, is that many of those people who went to the microphone to ask questions, and some of those who answered them from the podium, are far more concerned about a possible anti-Muslim backlash to the arrests than they are about the allegations that a whole whack of their young people were bent on blowing something up in the city; that they are generally worked up about Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and the Americans in Iraq, and that even as they talk about Islam being a religion of peace, they do not sound or appear particularly peaceable... '

2) Lorne Gunter in the National Post--the nonsense that our mission in Afstan caused "homegrown' terrorism;
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/issuesideas/story.html?id=de6578ef-177b-41e8-9cd1-9092c8c3afa5

'It was only a matter of time
...
We could let Muslims practise sharia law within their own community and guarantee Muslim students and employees set-aside space at schools and work for their five-times-daily prayers, and still the jihadis among us would conspire to buy explosives and plot to blow up Canadian targets until we all agreed to live under sharia law and worship Allah at dawn, mid-morning, noon, mid-afternoon and dusk.

Radical Muslims are not interested in what we will let them do. "You do your thing and I'll do mine" is a Western notion. Jihadis are motivated by a desire to make everyone else in the world bow to Muhammad, too...

The response of too much of officialdom to last week's revelations will be to call for redoubled efforts on behalf of pluralism: new anti-racism ad campaigns, more money for multicultural groups and festivals, new curricula in schools, more cultural sensitivity training for judges, politicians and bureaucrats...

Meanwhile, others will call for the withdrawal of Canadian troops from Afghanistan. They will argue the presence of our soldiers doing war in a Muslim nation is behind the uncovered plot.

According to police and intelligence sources, though, the alleged terror cell began its scheming and planning more than two years ago, when our only presence in Afghanistan was a 700-strong contingent patrolling the relatively peaceful capital, Kabul, as part of a NATO peacekeeping force. In other words, this cell allegedly began scoping out Canadian targets, training and assembling its materials long before our current combat-oriented mission in Kandahar against al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

Does our current mission upset jihadis? Undoubtedly. But they allegedly were mad enough to blow up innocent Canadian civilians even before our mission changed. If our troops were not at war with Muslims, something else would be the provocation. It doesn't take much...'

Mark
Ottawa




 
Some of those arrested had contact with people in the States that have been picked up on terrorism charges as well as those being watched in Britian, Bosnia, etc.
 
Strategic said:
I could be wrong but the fertilizer found is used in farming and controlled by the gov.

Believe it or not, it is not restricted but plans were in place to do so:

http://www.cfi.ca/files/press_releases/on_guard_05-06-16_FINAL.PDF

I guess the days of making fireworks in the darkroom are over.
 
Am I the only one worried about all the information warfare that has been so effectively waged on us over the past few days?  Where is the counter attack?
Now, not all moslems are terrorists: that goes without saying.  But, the day after they find all sorts of "stuff" and arrest some 17 people (who just happen to be moslem), the headlines aren't about the plot, likely targets, how it was brought down, etc, but the worry that moslems might (MIGHT!!!) feel "disenfranchised" by this whole bugga-boo.  To me, that is total ignorance.  As Blatchford wrote (I think it was her), we are ignoring the elephant.
Here is an analogy.  Suppose there is a serial rapist attacking Montreal.  How many women are on that list of suspects?  None.  Why?  Because women (generally) don't rape or collude to rape (some famous examples notwithstanding).  Still, the statement that "men rape" is a false one, because it implies that all men rape.  More accurately, perhaps the statement would be "all rapists are men, but not all men are rapists".  So, when looking for a rapist, focus on men, knowing that ONE of them is your target.
So, moslem extremists are plotting against us.  Do I look for them in Synagogues?  Churches?  Not likely.  Mosques?  Hmmmm....
Anyway, my point is this: every time one of these fella's opens his cake hole and suggests that so and so is anti violent, wouldn't hurt a flea, etc, I say that we ask Mr. So and So what his opinion is on Canadian Troops in Afghanistan (offensive action).  Ask him if he has any word of thanks and/or condolences for the families of Capt Goddard (the most recent KIA in Afghanistan).

Just my thoughts.
 
"While law enforcement was celebrating thwarting a massive, systematic attack on several southern Ontario targets, these kinds of questions, if not allegations, were being thrown around by lawyers all weekend -- many of whom were complaining about an overzealous Canadian intelligence world. "

And so begins the inevitable donkey show.  All of the a-hole forces of civil liberties will rise to assist these idiots, fund raisers for legal defence will be held, and hippies everywhere will have an opportunity to scream at The Man because that is what they do.  Meanwhile, somewhere an evil ******* chuckles and remarks about a snake eating its own tail. 
Honest to god, I really believe that the arsehole socialists in this country will not be satisfied until there is a smouldering crater and a death toll.  The fact is that there will be a horde of information that will not go public due to the sensitive intelligence nature of it.  Some people can't stand not knowing (likely the ones who as kids would go into a genuine fit when you would tell them "I've got a secret, I've got a secret"). 
As for the lack of previous contacts of the suspects, whoever made the observation that they are supposed to lay low was bang on.  Another excerpt from my Al-Qaeda training manual:

Necessary Qualifications fro the Organization’s members
8. Patience
[The member] should have plenty of patience for [enduring] afflictions if he is overcome by the enemies.  He should not abandon this great path and sell himself and his religion to the enemies for his freedom. He should be patient in performing the work, even if it lasts a long time.


as well:

Measures that Should be Taken by the Undercover Member:
In addition to the above measures, the member should ...
1. Not reveal his true name to the Organization’s members who are working with him, nor to the [Islamic] Da’wa [Call].
2. Have a general appearance that does not indicate Islamic orientation (beard, toothpick, book, [long] shirt, small Koran).
5. Carry falsified personal documents and know all the information they contain.
7. Have complete and accurate knowledge of the security status related to those around him in his place of work and residence, so that no danger or harm would catch him unaware.
8. Maintain his family and neighborhood relationships and should not show any changes towards them so that they would not attempt to bring him back [from the Organization] for security reasons.
10. Not speak loudly.
11. Not get involved in advocating good and denouncing evil in order not to attract attention to himself.
12. Break the daily routine, especially when performing an undercover mission. For example, changing the departure and return routes, arrival and departure times, and the store where he buys his goods.
13. Not causing any trouble in the neighborhood where he lives or at the place of work.
20. Not undergo a sudden change in his daily routine or any relationships that precede his Jihad involvement. For example, there should not be an obvious change in his habits of conversing, movement, presence, or disappearance. Likewise, he should not be hasty to sever his previous relationships.
Important Note:
* Married brothers should observe the following:
1. Not talking with their wives about Jihad work.
2. The members with security risks should not travel with their wives. A wife with an Islamic appearance (veil) attracts attention.


The above is largely unclassified now, but I took out some of the steps that might not have been as obvious as others.  As you can see, they are trained to be patient and blend with their surroundings. 

As for lawyers, they are generally a bunch of self serving whores, who will say or do anything for attention and/or money.  I don't really blame them, they have dedicated their lives to ensuring people don't have to be responsible for their actions.  If nothing else, it's just a job, and they are obliged to do the best they can.  It will be the judges that make or break this one.  I'm not buying the "entrapment" angle (an American term, BTW) and if they were working on this one for that long, they wouldn't have moved in unless they had a pretty solid case.  Plus, the plan must have been pretty imminently dangerous, otherwise they probably would have waited out for a bit in order to round up even more people.  Once something like this hits, the participants scurry like roaches into the shadows. 
Tamouh, as for your comments (so much happens over night)
I think that perhaps there is a cultural difference between yours and my interpretations of what mature and brainwashing mean.  I'm not going to beat it to death, as most of the other posts to those ends summed up how most of us feel.  I believe your heart is in the right place, however.  I am very curious, however, why there is no Islamic community leadership that can organize country wide demonstrations of support for Canada, and protests against terrorism.  Surely the nuances of the various sects are not so huge that something couldn't be put together?  I reminds me of when I was still living in Toronto, and I had a black partner while working security.  He took more crap than I did, and was constantly called "Uncle Tom" or "Oreo".  The Oreo one always struck me.  White on the inside?  So the black youths were saying to him that by being law abiding he was being white.  So what would the opposite inference be?  Is this the case with Arabs in general in your experience?  Are you branded some sort of sell out or race traitor if you make any sort of statements of support to Canada and it's largely Christian institutions?  I'm not trying to be a dick or anything.  As you appear to probably have a better track on what really goes on behind the scenes, I would be interested in your thoughts. 

Bilton, seriously, what is your deal?  Are you recovering from a stroke or something?  ???
 
Quote from Zipperhead Cop,

As for lawyers, they are generally a bunch of self serving whores, who will say or do anything for attention and/or money.  I don't really blame them, they have dedicated their lives to ensuring people don't have to be responsible for their actions.  If nothing else, it's just a job, and they are obliged to do the best they can.

Now this is a little too much over the top........like ANY trade, there are good and bad.
I blame the system more than anything,....I doubt very few started law school thinking " Just think of all the dirtbags I can help walk the street".
Methinks a clarification/apology would be warrented to those who wish to serve the greater good also.....
 
Excerpts from a couple of good columns:

1) Jim Travers, "National interest must come first: Canada neglects to reinforce essential values in its pursuit of multicultural tolerance";
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_PrintFriendly&c=Article&cid=1149545411381&call_pageid=970599119419

'...this is a domestic problem with offshore roots, not just a foreign problem manifesting itself at home. If the allegations are true and the plot more than a fantasy that became a conspiracy, we are under attack from ourselves...

In pursuing multicultural tolerance, Canada has been negligent in reinforcing essential, common-denominator values. Most of those are self-evident: human rights, the rule of law and the understanding that one person's freedom ends where another's begins.

These are all-defining and remain easily powerful enough to make this country a magnet. But what's slipped through cracks is that being Canadian requires a commitment passed from generation to generation.

Stripped bare of rhetoric and religion, politics and ethnicity, citizenship requires putting the national interest first.

To their shame and often for partisan advantage, politicians have been blinking when influential communities and interest groups fall below the threshold of what it means to hold a share in a nation of 33 million. As this weekend's events compellingly argue, that blindness is not sustainable.

In celebrating its differences, Canada must also protect the values that map the perimeter of its shared and evolving space. Along with all levels of government, every community leader, group and ethnic fragment shares responsibility for deciding what is acceptable and exposing what won't be tolerated.

Canada chose long ago to be the world in one place and, happily, that choice is not reversible. But the tougher decisions remain ahead for a country that must forge cohesion as immigration continues to rise and becomes even more diverse.'

2) Rondi Adamson, "Moderate Western Muslims, speak up! Do we really need social research to condemn Islamofacism?";
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0606/p09s01-coop.html

'    Aly Hindy, a high-profile imam in the Toronto suburb of Scarborough, called the arrests "an attack on the Muslim community." He went on to say that, "We are abusing our boys for the sake of pleasing George Bush." Rather than speaking out against extremism, or entertaining the notion that perhaps his country's security forces know what they're doing, Hindy called the charges against the men "home-grown baloney."

    Even moderate Canadian Muslim groups, willing to show faith in Canada's justice system, are mitigating their statements. The Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) praised the work of Canada's spy agency and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. But then they scolded the Canadian government for not funding "academic research to diagnose this serious social problem and provide scientific solutions to it." A scientific solution to Islamofascism? Bring it on.

    The group also chastised Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper for portraying events "as a battle between 'us' and 'them.' " Following the arrests, Mr. Harper stated that "we are a target because of who we are. And how we live." One wonders - do the members of the CIC not consider themselves part of the "we" Harper referred to, when he spoke of Canadians? If so, that is indeed revealing.

    The Muslim Canadian Congress fared only a tad bit better. They praised the police, and expressed dismay that members of their community might be guilty as charged. And then they managed to blame President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and even Harper for the fact that any such terror cells might exist. So far, only the Council on American-Islamic Relations Canada (CAIR-CAN) has managed to issue a condemnation of terror, and praise of the police, without tacking on a "but," a "Bush," or a "Canadian troops in Afghanistan."

    I was happily surprised at CAIR-CAN's press release. I shouldn't have been. We must expect that Western Muslims will wholeheartedly condemn Islamofascism, without any conditions placed on that condemnation. Without that, we may reach a point of divisions too deep to mend.'

Sorry about length, but think the points are important.

Mark
Ottawa
 
We do realize that these people will be tried in Canada right? 

Therefore even if they are convicted they will likely get 5-10 yrs in some estate style prison for their "own safety".

Wes

In some ways I can understand your concerns.  Yes it is very rare that leaders of Muslim communities de-nounce the activities of those who are terrorists.  But you have to be careful in your approach to solving the problem.

Imagine those that live in London UK having one of the largest extremist populations outside of the Middle East.

Yes it is sad that we can not all get along, but this will continue to happen until the different Islamic secs take on these Extremist secs on their own.  The more the West gets involved the more numbers the extremist get.
 
I'm going to have to disagree with those saying that they won't recieve proper punishment.  If convicted under the anti-terrorism act these guys are facing some major sentences.

From: http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2001/doc_27787.html

On sentencing:
The Criminal Code would also stipulate that the sentences imposed for each of these offences are to be served consecutively to any other sentence imposed relating to the same activity or event.

On early parole:
The offender would also be ineligible for parole for half of the sentence imposed unless the accused can demonstrate that it is not in the public interest. This is similar to the approach taken in Bill C-24, the Government of Canada's organized crime bill, and reflects the serious nature of these crimes.

 
Redbeaver said:
I'm going to have to disagree with those saying that they won't recieve proper punishment.  If convicted under the anti-terrorism act these guys are facing some major sentences.

From: http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2001/doc_27787.html

These are the same judges who sentence people under s85 of the Criminal Code for Using a Firearm in the Commission of an Offence?

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/267161.html#Section-85

Riiiighht!  I feel safer already.
 
Once again where are you going to send them if they were born here?
I still wonder how these terrorism laws will effect the young offenders.
 
Quagmire said:
Once again where are you going to send them if they were born here?
I still wonder how these terrorism laws will effect the young offenders.

Well, like the former members of the FLQ, who felt that they had no allegiance to Canada in 1970, we can send them to Cuba also.

If Canada is not good enough for them, then we should send them somewhere else.  If they think that Islam is the way that they want to follow, and not 'Western Ways', let's send them to somewhere where they will experience what they desire in life.  Perhaps a HALO drop over Saudi Arabia w/o chutes.  ;D
 
if you are involved / participate in a terrorist act then you should not be trialed under the young offender's act. You want to play with the big boys.....

If they are "born & bred" in Canada & are involved in a revolt / insurection, then I would offer to ship em to a couple of lovely places "Alert" or "Grise Fjord" come to mind...way, way up north.... there are no fences and if they want to attempt an escape.... let em try.
 
moving from any totalitarian country to a "free form" democracy will require HUGE adaptation but, when you get down to it.... the people who have immigrated here WANT CHANGE, they want what we have and don't want to put up with the abuse and BS that has existed back at home.

To come here and throw on the Burqua once again..... WTF!
 
Folks, I have not a racist bone in my body,....assholes come from every way, shape and form. However the ONE BIG problem I have with the whole situation is this,

I am a white male,....if 17 young white males had been arrested for plotting a terrorist attack, I, and everyone I know, would be cheering the arrests.

It seems though, that this sentiment is not reciprocated by the various Muslim groups.........and THAT is very, very wrong.

 
...and now for a change of pace.

According to Global News, 2 dozen members of the JTF-2 were on standby in coptors just minutes away from the alledged training camp......
 
I agree that there should be vigilance inside the Muslim communities and extremist clerics that lecture that the murder of non believers is justified need to be routed out.  But I don't think that Muslim communities across Canada should be burdened with having to prove that they don't endorse terrorism.  For most the only connection to the accused is that they share the same religion. 

Some are already speaking out: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=1acfdf50-3657-4286-acbf-ae2b5de4cad0

Many Toronto area community leaders were involved in the investigation but there has been no mention yet of how much they cooperated.  I guess that will come out during the trial.
 
Back
Top