afghan dad said:
Hello..I've spent the last week reading the comments
Then, sir, I respecfully suggest that you spend a second week, actually paying attention to what has been written this time as you have quite obviously missed almost everything.
afghan dad said:
I must ask..what have you complainers done yourselves to help.
Check the profiles of the other posters and see. Most here have extensive actual military service, including tours in Afghanistan and elsewhere, or are family members. And those that made that trip from Trenton to Toronto for
real are our friends, colleagues, and family.
afghan dad said:
These guys decided to have a rally and ONE family complained about a name on the car,ONE.
You have, as I said, obviously not paid attention to what has been written here. The first thing that turned me off about this event, as I stated quite clearly, was the simulation of a solemn event and billing it as "fun for the whole family", and a chance to "experience" a repatriation. I was disgusted by that whole notion, and am even more so now. If people really want to experience a repatriation, then they can put their kids in hearse-borne boxes and ride along.
The whole concept is sick.
afghan dad said:
It must have been a very hard decision to leave it on for these guys,but they did.
That's not the impression that I get. I don't think that they cared. I may be wrong - in fact, I hope, really hope, that I'm wrong but I see no indication that I am and plenty that I'm not.
afghan dad said:
united way,if you care to check before mouthing off,is not a registered charity for the same reasons these guys aren't.
Well, we really don't know if the reason is the same or not, do we? United Way certainly has a more established track record, and does issue tax receipts.
afghan dad said:
Plenty, and in many different countries. I've yet to see one get auctioned off, though.
afghan dad said:
any town too small for their own cenotaph
I have yet to see any such town, unless it had no war dead whose names would have gone on one.
afghan dad said:
As far as raising funds for our veterans during this rally...So what,I consider it a waste to have hundreds of people gather and not do something like raising funds for any charity.
I'd have no objection to fund-raising for suitable charities so long as I knew where every penny went - and I don't.
afghan dad said:
Now come on you guys,these heroes on the side of the car,if asked today,knowing the kind of giving people they must have been,would I strongly believe,would have no problem with raising money for our vets,their friends that made it home after all are now vets.
I will state it right here, publically, that should I not make it back from my upcoming tour, that I do not want my name or image misused in any way, shape, or form on any questionable "fundraising" activity or website (and most definitely not in any tasteless repatriation or funeral simulation), other than officially recognized ones or on this forum.
afghan dad said:
As for the ladies from petawawa,why is it that you figure if its not your rally,its not acceptable.
Please either provide references where either of them stated that, or retract your comment and apologize to them.
They have made it quite clear that they do not object to other rallies, and that their objections were due to their names being misused and misrepresented on Mr Muntz's website.
afghan dad said:
I think its a shame you did'nt raise funds for a good cause when you had the chance.Just think about how nice it would have been to hand over a cheque to the childrens wish fund,or cancer society,in the memory of our fallen.What a gesture and heartfelt situation that would have been and the families would I imagine be happy that the memory of their loved ones lived on in a thank you letter from one of these choosen charites.
That was not the aim of the original rallies. It's also not the aim of many other similar activities.
The aim was to raise public support for "the troops", ie people like us here. Most people are quite capable of deciding which charities and causes they wish to fund on their own.
afghan dad said:
You people writing back and forth putting down the efforts of Brian Muntz,Brian Wilkins,who by the way served in afghanistan as well as me,and Brandon Arnold,sickens me,and you need to look at what you are doing here.
Anybody who has spent any time in uniform develops a pretty sensitive BS Detection System. Mr Muntz et al may be absolute saints, and truly above reproach. As I said earlier in this post and previous ones, I hope that they are and that I'm wrong. My BSDS was triggered immediately, and still has not stopped.
I do not know you, Mr Muntz, Mr Wilkins, or anybody else involved with the Red Friday Foundation. I do, however, know several of the other posters here quite well and they have rather more credibility than strangers who, at
best, have repeatedly screwed up the execution of what may have been a purely noble undertaking.
In the face of everything that I have seen and heard, I simply cannot believe them no matter how much I want to.
afghan dad said:
I suggest you get off your chairs and plan something...
Some here have, and with none of this controversy. For most of the rest of us, doing so would be inappropriate - a "support me" rally would be unseemly.
afghan dad said:
You people should be ashamed of yourselves.
Sorry, but no.
When the questions have been answered to our satisfaction, and certain things treated with a little more sensitivity and less appearance of exploitation, then you'll see some apologies.
I sincerely hope that we'll see reason to give them, but...