- Reaction score
jmt18325 said:Whether it was $1.4 or 2B is sort of irrelevant to the actual point of why the money should be moved.
Justification for re-profile (why the money should be moved) was not why I asked you the question; I do not actually disagree with the concept of reprofiling investment cash from the accrual envelope of the fiscal framework. I was looking for factual provision of information related to magnitude. You quoted a media article within which the authors did not present their references to an assertion. Their assertion appears to be either inaccurate, or included other factors not immediately apparent to readers from the content of their article.
I presented references to actual Governmental data that shows different figures than the article you used as a reference. David Perry's reference of the same figures that I referred to from actual Government sources (TB data of the Main Estimates) give me greater faith in Mr. Perry's journalistic craft than that of Mssrs. Fekete and Berthaume.
So you are saying that accuracy of the figures, give or take a fraction of a billion dollars, isn't important?
*edit - spelling