quadrapiper
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 489
- Points
- 810
Which highlights an issue with the cadet programs: why does the RCN need to stand up the NEP when there's an enormous organization theoretically meant to deliver exactly those intangibles, and develop an interest in and awareness of the CAF/RCN/CA/RCAF?There is also the intangible of the NEP. Young people get life experiences, learn to do tasks, self-discipline, etc. Plus another person who knows something about the military.
Apparently the notion of the Commanders RCN, CA, and RCAF taking some greater degree of ownership of "their" respective cadet organizations was shopped around a few years ago, with no interest (or perhaps no interest on the part of one or two of the three). I know I've mentioned this before, maybe in this thread, but from the snake's belly any increased top-level parent-service interest and direction would be an improvement.
The NEP is a different beast from what's possible with cadets, but the latter should be able to provide as much value as the former in getting Canadians informed about and interested in a naval career.
Wonder if something NEP-like should be looked at as a standard means of training incoming sailors.These NEP sailors who stay will have more training and experience, than the majority of Officers and Ratings when they sailed to protect convoy's in WWII. You need to give a program like this a good 5 years to see if it makes a difference.
As for the ones using it end run around the bottlenecks, they should congratulated for their ingenuity and determination to join despite the efforts of CAF bureaucracy to stymie them.