- Reaction score
- 6,352
- Points
- 1,160
Late post. Already being discussed.
Well, some cynics on the socials are suggesting going back to the old ranks to preserve traditions and hail back to our roots could be seen as a less-than-fully-effective use of time/energy, too. Feels like it's about the pendulum swinging back and forth, and this is getting to one end of the swing.... I’m of the belief that a powerful and vocal minority out there wants to destabilize our traditions and totally disconnect us from our roots.
One person who wrote a memo back in 2019 (not entirely to whom the memo was written exactly) calling for the song to be changed is a now retired commanding officer who was universally lauded by anyone and everyone who ever worked for them. Isaw a Chief tear up when saying good bye at their DWD. This is not a person who wants to destabilize our traditions or totally disconnect the navy from its roots, but someone who wants the navy to be the best it can be.I’m of the belief that a powerful and vocal minority out there wants to destabilize our traditions and totally disconnect us from our roots.
Sure Gramps….Heart of Engineered Hardwood?
I compare it to Toronto tearing down all of its historic buildings and putting up soul-less towers in their place. So absolutely change the lyrics. Otherwise, I can see Canada getting a march that is so crappy that it makes the new Royal Australian Navy March (which replaced Heart of Oak) seem great in comparison. Even if it does tick all the boxes for diversity and inclusion.The music is great, just change the lyrics. Even the US national anthem is a modified British song.
I was going to mention that. "Just as your knows how to carry a cross, it also knows how to carry the cross." Which is appropriate for a song about the Roman Catholic feast of Saint John the Baptist, patron saint of Quebec.Our national anthem songs about knowing how to carry the cross and the sword.
We already had that exercise happen during Unification.Otherwise, I can see Canada getting a march that is so crappy that it makes the new Royal Australian Navy March (which replaced Heart of Oak) seem great in comparison. Even if it does tick all the boxes for diversity and inclusion.
It sounds like they were very respected and influential. Did they champion any cultural changes or tackle service wide issues in addition to getting this song removed from circulation?One person who wrote a memo back in 2019 (not entirely to whom the memo was written exactly) calling for the song to be changed is a now retired commanding officer who was universally lauded by anyone and everyone who ever worked for them. Isaw a Chief tear up when saying good bye at their DWD. This is not a person who wants to destabilize our traditions or totally disconnect the navy from its roots, but someone who wants the navy to be the best it can be.
If in doubt, ask Chat GPT, "Please generate alternative lyrics to the British and Canadian naval march "Heart of Oak" removing any gender references or references to historical events while still maintaining the spirit of the song."
And the result?
Thank you, thank you - I'm here all week ...
Yes, and yes. I mean, they not have had the influence to affect service wide issues service wide, but they certainly had the the influence to tackle service wide issues within their sphere of influence.It sounds like they were very respected and influential. Did they champion any cultural changes or tackle service wide issues in addition to getting this song removed from circulation?
There's an in-house style that's very light and spritely: something of the public service announcement jingle about it, and a very strong feeling that it's written for the smallest ensemble possible, versus the enormous Royal Marine or Guards bands who informed the older arrangements and compositions.Artistic endeavours initiated by bureaucrats is always soulless and cringey.