• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
CJOC needs a vigorous application of hacksaws and machetes to its HQ structure. Last figures I saw suggest that the HQ alone is nearly the same size as a Reg F infantry battalion.
For a force employment command, it has a lot of force generation and institutional functions that need another home.
 
I guess a question that should be answered though is what does a joint HQ like CJOC do in the case of the CAF.

Sandwiched between the SJS and the various deployed Op HQs what function does it do?

Do we expect it to command joint forces in combat like a U.S. Combatant Command?
Even many of the OPs HQ such as TFL are not going to command forces in combat, that is done by the NATO or US HQs to which our forces are declared.

If we don’t have a need to C2 forces in combat or operations and the joint HQ is merely a joint force generation coordinator do we need it in addition to the L1 HQs and the SJS?
 
I’m of the opinion as well that we need a joint command to actually synchronize our overall environments. Right now CJOC is not that but it could be.
I would argue though that we need two joint commands. I would suggest that Canada needs to get on board with combining NORTHCOM into NORAD and taking NORAD from an aerospace defensive construct into a joint combined multi domain defensive construct.

CJOC runs international stuff and a revamped NORAD runs continental stuff.
The bigger question would be whether the US wants Canada in NORTHCOM.
 
I’d agree IF the PRes can be reformed/reformatted — right now I don’t see the CA having that desire. Hence my hedging towards the Reg units.
I really can't understand why there hasn't been a desire. Other than an improved PRes challenges the needs for PYs. I do hope we aren't that parochial. In any event there is zero question in my mind that it has to happen or the death spiral will continue.
I don't see CANSOF having room for a Lt Bde as well in Pet without an expansion of the training area.
But currently that's what is there - 2 CMBG has a recce regt, an arty regt, an engr regt, two inf bns and a svc bn all located in Petawawa now. A light bde wouldn't be much different in total numbers. One of the dirty secrets about Petawawa is that no one uses the 3/4 of the ranges in the south end. It needs to be forested out.
There needs to be a Joint HQ - and not spelled JARMY (the J is silent), I'd rather have the Div HQ's be actual deployable entities (or at least 1 Div) so that leaves the need for Joint HQ for NA, as well as potential Pacific Forces.

I think you need to be surgical with staffing and command for it - but I see being able to kill off a lot of other HQ's if one retains CJOC.
Yeah. I rethunk that.
I’m of the opinion as well that we need a joint command to actually synchronize our overall environments. Right now CJOC is not that but it could be.
I would argue though that we need two joint commands. I would suggest that Canada needs to get on board with combining NORTHCOM into NORAD and taking NORAD from an aerospace defensive construct into a joint combined multi domain defensive construct.

CJOC runs international stuff and a revamped NORAD runs continental stuff.
Interesting idea. That takes us back to a CanadaCom and a CEFCom.
CJOC needs a vigorous application of hacksaws and machetes to its HQ structure. Last figures I saw suggest that the HQ alone is nearly the same size as a Reg F infantry battalion.
The size of a RegF inf bn? :ROFLMAO: You wish! If only our inf bns were that large.
100 people. Tops.
Probably a few more if you count in the regional task forces, and the CFJOSG, but I like your thinking.

🍻
 
Probably a few more if you count in the regional task forces, and the CFJOSG but I like your thinking.

🍻
CFJOSG has always bugged me, strictly because it is an unnecessary middle man between the planners and the doers.

Anything J1, J4(Mov or Sustain), or J6 is going to be drafted by CJOC COS Sup, tasked to the individual units (CFCMU, 3 CSU, or CFJSR) and then carried out. Moreso, a JOSG led JTFSC creates more layers of bureaucracy in theatre than its worth and causes friction points with a force element's integral support.

It all seems like a PY sink to play Hot Potato with support tasks.
 
Last edited:
C for Canada and C for Combined are two circles of a Venn diagram that pretty much don’t touch…
 
Not in the thankfully defunct Canada Command but very much so in NORAD.
NORAD is not so much ‘combined’ as hardcore bilateral. Combined usually carries the connotation of several nations interoperating, more so than just two.
 
It works for CANR already inside NORAD
Again, same note as I noted to Fabius. In my experience, when I hear a C of combined such as in a CTF, CJTF or a CJSOTF, it’s several nations collaborating together.

By a pure definition, could a bilateral activity between just two nations be described as combined? Sure. Never seen it though. I don’t know of any position in NORAD that is described as a ‘combined’ position. Combined as a term doesn’t appear in any official material I know of, but always open to leaning if it has.

 
I have always understood combined as meaning two or more nations but whether a combat command focused on the defence on North America with the existing NORAD as it’s inspiration is bilateral or combined is largely an academic question.
Either way it would be a unified command with both Canadian and US personnel, assets and authorities, responsible for the defence of North America in the air, sea, and land domains and would integrate with the respective national cyber and space elements.
 
US Pattern

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs - advises POTUS - General/Admiral O-10/OF-9
US Army Chief of Staff - commands the army? - General O-10/OF-9

Commander Forces Command - administers the non-operational army - General O-10/OF-9
Forces Command trains and prepares a combat ready, globally responsive Total Force in order to build and sustain readiness to meet Combatant Command requirements."

Operational commanders subordinated to Forces Command include the commanders of I Corps, III Corps, V Corps, XVIII Corps - all Lt Gens O-9/OF-8

Commander North Command, an operational Joint Force Command - General (USAF) - O-10/OF-9
Commander North Command also Commander NORAD

Component North Command commanders include:

Commander US Army North - Lt Gen 0-9/OF-8
Commander US Marine Forces North - Lt Gen O-9/OF-8
Commander US Air Force North - Lt Gen O-9/OF-8
The US Naval Force North is and Admiral O-10/OF-9 double hatted from the USN's Fleet Forces Command.

North Command subordinates include

Deputy -Lt Gen US Army Reserve O-9/OF-8 double hatted as Vice Commander NORAD
Commander Alaskan Command - Lt Gen USAF O-9/OF-8 double hatted as Commander NORAD Alaskan Region and Commander 11th Air Force

NORAD subordinates include

Vice - Lt General US Army Reserve O-9/OF-8 double hatted as Deputy Commander North Command
Commander NORAD CONUS - Lt Gen USAF (ANG) O-9/OF-8 double hatted as Commander 1st Air Force
Commander NORAD Alaska - Lt Gen USAF O-9/OF-8 double hatted as Commander NORAD Alaskan Region and Commander 11th Air Force

NORAD Deputy Commander - Lt Gen RCAF O-9/OF-8
Commander NORAD Canada - Maj Gen RCAF O-8/OF-7

....

If I were to follow this pattern then:

CDS - General/Admiral OF-9
CCA - General OF-9 - equivalent to the Army Chief of Staff
CCA (Admin) - General OF-9 - equivalent to Commander Forces Command responsible for providing ready forces, including useful reserves

Lts Gen OF-8
Deputy CCA (Admin)
Deputy CCA (Ops and Planning)

Majs Gen OF-7
Assistant Deputy CCA (Admin)
Assistant Deputy CCA (Ops and Planning)
Commander 1st Division (High Readiness)
Commander 2nd Division (Low Readiness - Reserve)
Commander Expeditionary Division A - skeleton
Commander Expeditionary Division B - skeleton

Joint Commands

Commander Canada Com (Joint) - Lt Gen/V Adm OF-8
I want that person to be at least the equal of the Commander Alaska Command so that they can talk across the boundaries on equal terms

On the same grounds the Commander CANR should be a Lt-Gen RCAF, the same rank as the DCOM NORAD,

Battalion CO's are Lt Colonels. They have Majors reporting to them. One of those Majors is appointed as his Deputy.
Why doesn't the same rationale apply to the NORAD structure?

....

Commander Expeditionary Force?
How big a force to you want to deploy?
If only a battle group then Commander CEF only needs to be a Colonel.
If a brigade then a Brigadier, if a division then an MGen.

....

Where the winding round the axle seems to occur is the worry about Lt Gen's having to have 50,000 pairs of heels to click.

Lt Gen US V Corps

V Corps Headquarters will have approximately 635 soldiers, with approximately 200 who will support an operational command post in Europe. The Corps Headquarters is projected to be operational by autumn 2020. On 12 February 2020, the Army announced that V Corps' new headquarters would be located at Fort Knox, Kentucky.

That is from Wiki and it refers to a time past when V Corps was being reactivated after being off line for a decade or two.

V Corps is/was in command of

Effectively the Corps commander has command over 2nd Cavalry Regiment, some support elements and such other troops as may be assigned.

The rank of the Commander reflects the people the Commander will have to talk to, where they slot in the organization and the number and type of subordinate commands place under them.

...

US Generals don't seem to have a problem with reporting to an officer that has the same grade although they may have a more responsible position.
 
Just don't use the word 'cuts' ....

Email reveals that Ottawa told Canada's top soldier not to call budget changes 'cuts'​

Canada's top soldier was told he couldn't use the word "cut" in a memo to soldiers about the federal government's budget plans for the military, newly disclosed documents reveal.

The emails late last summer between Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre's office and the Department of National Defence (DND), obtained by the Star under the Access to Information Act, highlight the bewildering semantics — and the tension — between Canada's soldiers and its politicians when it comes to defence spending.

I wish they would just get moving on this and do the change they really want. IngSoc has such a nice ring to it. Ministry of Love is very nice too. You just know He wants too.

I would bet anyone a case of Blue ( :) ) if they changed to the Ministries of Truth, Love, Peace, and Plenty. That no one would notice and the CBC would defend it too.
 
Before the panic sets in, looks like they're removing the need for CEMS for trades with softer requirements and waiving CFAT if you have uni/college completed which makes a lot of sense.
This is overdue.

With my MELs, I would be disqualified under CEMS, however, do not breach Universality of Service and am still deployable.

I can imagine it being a huge dissatisfier in the whole process, finding out you're more than qualified toserve... except for the fact you have a perfectly manageable ailment that was a cause for concern 40 years ago...
 
Mhm, I'm sure lowering standards will have no impact at all.

"I was a little taken aback ... I really want to serve my country."

Highlighted above, the problem with military recruitment, workplace environments in general, and everything going wrong in society.
 
Back
Top