I'll believe it when I see it.
Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending
- Thread starter Maxman1
- Start date
WLSC
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 489
- Points
- 840
Not surprised we are not there but I think we need to go that route, popping the artificial bubble that JT has created. We need to be pushed on the side for real foa a while until he understands.
- Reaction score
- 17,098
- Points
- 1,010
He doesn’t care.
- Reaction score
- 7,079
- Points
- 1,310
He understands fully. He just doesn't give a rat's ass.
The Defence Portfolio doesn't buy votes, nor does it see a return on investment domestically. The only thing it buys you is clout internationally, but I think JT realises his goose is cooked on the world stage. He has F'ed Around enough with faux pas' and paper tiger threats that he is now rightfully Finding Out.
Perhaps if we become a grown up country, we might see our national defence, sovereignty, and foreign policy as non-partisan issues. Until then, the CAF is a hot potato no politician wants to hold near and dear to their hearts.
- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 1,160
But
and it is a big but, there is an outside chance that more Canadians may notice he , and his CABAL, don't care.
And maybe that will focus minds enough that they act at the next election.
- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 1,160
Defence may not be the issue but China, or drugs, or Uktrainians might be.
- Reaction score
- 7,079
- Points
- 1,310
Not as big as home affordability, grocery prices, Healthcare, and many other sacred cows that have been the main narrative for the past 3 years. Your average voter can't see past making next week, let alone if we are prepared to eventually get pulled into conflict on one or both sides of the world.
- Reaction score
- 22,076
- Points
- 1,360
So long as Herr Porsche-Rolex stays attached at the hip, odds are JT’s going to try to ride it out until 2025…
- Reaction score
- 5,969
- Points
- 1,090
We're not a traditional nation state, we are a collection of provinces. So you're not going to get what you like barring a massive restructuring of federalism. A weak federal government is a feature not a bug. It has nothing to do with being grown up, but everything to do with how we designed federalism.
FJAG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 13,798
- Points
- 1,160
Not sure that works.
The US constitution is one heavily tilted to states rights - and yet strong Federal defence powers. The Federal government has essentially coopted the various states' defence forces over the years.
The Canadian constitution is heavily tilted to the Federal government's powers (look, for example, at the residual powers clause) - it doesn't even have provincial defence forces. The Feds coopted that power on the first day.
There are more than enough mechanisms by which the Canadian Federal government could be a "grown up" vis a vis defence. Primarily a constitutional responsibility for national defence and a practically limited taxation and spending power.
It's not structure; it's attitude.
WLSC
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 489
- Points
- 840
He will when it will turn into big business start to turn is back on us.
WLSC
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 489
- Points
- 840
I’ve said it somewhere else on the forum, the federal abandoned it responsibilities and had become a big provincial government. The two level is competing on who’s will be the real care giver to the population.Not sure that works.
The US constitution is one heavily tilted to states rights - and yet strong Federal defence powers. The Federal government has essentially coopted the various states' defence forces over the years.
The Canadian constitution is heavily tilted to the Federal government's powers (look, for example, at the residual powers clause) - it doesn't even have provincial defence forces. The Feds coopted that power on the first day.
There are more than enough mechanisms by which the Canadian Federal government could be a "grown up" vis a vis defence. Primarily a constitutional responsibility for national defence and a practically limited taxation and spending power.
It's not structure; it's attitude.
Not that the federal doesn’t have a role to play, it sure does but as you said, it’s all about the attitude.
- Reaction score
- 1,414
- Points
- 1,160
Trudeau has failed at the above.
- Reaction score
- 356
- Points
- 780
Presuposes an interest on the part of Joe Canadian.
Spencer100
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,201
- Points
- 1,040
I like the way you put that. It so true.
- Reaction score
- 21,962
- Points
- 1,260
Start? It’s been occurring for years.
- Reaction score
- 7,079
- Points
- 1,310
This.
Most vendors in the US clamor for defence contracts. In Canada, they run the other way. Why? It's a losing bet.
The odds are heavily stacked against the industry; the GoC will either take too long to make a decision, will demand the project be within some asinine paramater (Green, Aboriginal, vote rich Ste. Poutain de Caliss, etm.) , or eventually cancel the project after a decade of courting and R&D.
- Reaction score
- 6,701
- Points
- 1,140
He won't care, because he is wealthy enough that he and his children will never feel the impact of it.
- Reaction score
- 21,962
- Points
- 1,260
Pretty sure someone named Louis the XVI thought the same
- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 1,160
Other stuff we're missing out on because: China
breakingdefense.com
breakingdefense.com
The AI side of AUKUS: UK reveals ground-breaking, allied tech demo - Breaking Defense
The AI trial saw a wide range of air and ground vehicles tasked with testing target identification capabilities, as the allies cope with what the UK Ministry of Defence called a "rapidly evolving" strategic environment.
breakingdefense.com
Boeing's Ghost Bat loyal wingman drone spotted hanging in US - Breaking Defense
The Air Force said months ago it was planning to run flight experiments with the unmanned system, and even though this Ghost Bat was housed not far from an Air Force base, it's unclear if the testing has begun.
breakingdefense.com
- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 1,160
And in the UK even the bean counters are figuring out there is something to this risk/reward calculation.
Apparently indecision costs lives.
breakingdefense.com
Continuous Improvement demands Continuous Investment.
Apparently indecision costs lives.
After watching Ukraine, UK 'looking at' more risk-taking in weapons development, integration - Breaking Defense
“Making these decisions can actually affect the safety of people, so what we’re looking at now, [considering] there will always be an end-state of a design for a weapon, there may be occasions where we want to take greater risk and therefore accelerate integration," said John Cunningham, Head of...
breakingdefense.com
Continuous Improvement demands Continuous Investment.
Similar threads
- Article
