Remius said:If you were a newish RCMP officer you would not be with Protective Services either.
What's that assumption based on? What's your operating definition of 'newish'?
Remius said:If you were a newish RCMP officer you would not be with Protective Services either.
Well, so far, fact checkers say no decision's been made yet ...milnews.ca said:Sooooo, which is it, then?
op:
- Attributed: "Finance Minister Bill Morneau said today the federal government hasn't decided if Ottawa would help to cover the security costs associated with a move by Prince Harry and his wife Meghan to Canada ..." (CBC)
- No mention of sourcing: "Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has agreed taxpayers in his country should pick up the huge bill for the couple’s round-the-clock protection while they are in the country, the Evening Standard has learned. Mr Trudeau — still dealing with the fall-out from the downing of a Ukrainian aircraft by the Iranian military which killed 57 Canadians — has privately assured the Queen that Harry, Meghan and Archie’s safety will not be jeopardised while they reside there ..." (UK Evening Standard)
Brought to you by #NotBoughtMedia... Trudeau told Canadian media Global News in an interview on January 13 that nothing had been settled in regards to the security bill for the royal family, which media estimated to be Can$1.7 million. “We’re not entirely sure what the final decisions will be, those are decisions for them (the royal couple),” Trudeau said.
A government source close to the matter told AFP that this had not changed as of the time of publication on January 15, adding that reports of Trudeau offering to the Queen to pay for Harry and Meghan’s protection are false ...
tomahawk6 said:Private security will be bought by the Duke and Duchess.
milnews.ca said:
tomahawk6 said:Private security will be bought by the Duke and Duchess. Hope reality sets in and they go back on the public purse. Their brand may not be worth as much as they expect.
The way forward ?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2020/01/13/prince-william-take-note-queen-kept-rebellious-sibling-side/
tomahawk6 said:Love can be so blind.
Why pay security costs for Harry and Meghan?
https://theprovince.com/opinion/letters/letters-to-the-province-jan-16-2020-security-costs-for-harry-and-meghan
If a family wanted to migrate to Canada and a member had a medical condition that would cost Canadian taxpayers $1 million annually, their application would probably be refused.
When I heard that the Canadian government may foot the bill for their security while they wait for a government change in the U.S. so they can move to Los Angeles to be closer to Hollywood, it went from absurd to ridiculously surreal.
Hamish Seggie said:So Megan doesn't want to live in the US as long as Trump is President?
Meghan Markle plans to move to Los Angeles only after Trump leaves office, report
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/meghan-markle-plans-move-los-angeles-after-trump-leaves-office-report
Brihard said:What's that assumption based on? What's your operating definition of 'newish'?
Brihard said:Something to bear in mind; private bodyguards in Canada would not be carrying firearms. Police can.
Remius said:My assumption was that he was talking about someone right out of Depot.
Remius said:All your limos are brinks trucks.
tomahawk6 said:William did advise his brother not to marry her. Love can be so blind.
tomahawk6 said:Arent the Royals supposed to be apolitical ?