- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
I have a question for something that's not sitting right with me.
I got my Official Decision...granted....great ...%....no problem with that.
The question I have is the following quote "based on Departmental Medical Avisory, we have determined that the diagnosis of shin splints better reflects your disability. As a result, we have changed your claim and provide a ruling for shin splints.
The original diagnosis was from my doctor after 5 years and the change is kinda odd. Blunt trauma injury, nerve damage, neuroma knee/shin documented up the ying yang.....shin splints - really? not. The damage is in my knee not the shin.....?
Any suggestions? Any explanation...?
Everything I have found is to address denials, not content or clarification......same process?
Thanks
I got my Official Decision...granted....great ...%....no problem with that.
The question I have is the following quote "based on Departmental Medical Avisory, we have determined that the diagnosis of shin splints better reflects your disability. As a result, we have changed your claim and provide a ruling for shin splints.
The original diagnosis was from my doctor after 5 years and the change is kinda odd. Blunt trauma injury, nerve damage, neuroma knee/shin documented up the ying yang.....shin splints - really? not. The damage is in my knee not the shin.....?
Any suggestions? Any explanation...?
Everything I have found is to address denials, not content or clarification......same process?
Thanks