• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Cost of housing in Canada

Landlords charge these prices for closest because there is a market for them.

Capitalism at work.
 
A rain tax :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:. Torontonians deserve this so much.

I actually have to pay that here in HRM. (Halifax)

Wonder if they find it :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: in Halifax?

Canadian municipalities that currently feature a stormwater user fee​


Don't see Toronto on the list.

CommunityProvinceType of Stormwater Fee
HalifaxNova ScotiaEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
LondonOntarioFee based on Property Size
AuroraOntarioFlat Rate (per unit)
St. ThomasOntarioFlat Rate
KitchenerOntarioSingle Family Residential Unit (SFRU)
MarkhamOntarioResidential / Non-residential flat rate*
MississaugaOntarioSingle Family Residential Unit (SFRU)
NewmarketOntarioDevelopment Intensity & Property Size
WaterlooOntarioTiered Flat Rate
Richmond HillOntarioTiered Flat Rate
GuelphOntarioEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
ReginaSaskatchewanFlat Rate (based on porperty size)
SaskatoonSaskatchewanEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
CalgaryAlbertaFlat Rate
EdmontonAlbertaIntensity Factor & Runoff Coefficient
Saint AlbertAlbertaFlat Rate
Strathcona CountyAlbertaFlat Rate
LangleyBritish ColumbiaStormwater Levy*
Pitt MeadowsBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
RichmondBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
SurreyBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
VictoriaBritish ColumbiaImpervious Area
West VancouverBritish ColumbiaTiered Flat Rate
White RockBritish Columbia
 
Landlords charge these prices for closest because there is a market for them.

Capitalism at work.
Except the market didn't get to this state due to capitalism, it got there due to government interference. The housing market and housing construction are some of the most regulated things in the country.
 
Wonder if they find it :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: in Halifax?

Canadian municipalities that currently feature a stormwater user fee​


Don't see Toronto on the list.

CommunityProvinceType of Stormwater Fee
HalifaxNova ScotiaEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
LondonOntarioFee based on Property Size
AuroraOntarioFlat Rate (per unit)
St. ThomasOntarioFlat Rate
KitchenerOntarioSingle Family Residential Unit (SFRU)
MarkhamOntarioResidential / Non-residential flat rate*
MississaugaOntarioSingle Family Residential Unit (SFRU)
NewmarketOntarioDevelopment Intensity & Property Size
WaterlooOntarioTiered Flat Rate
Richmond HillOntarioTiered Flat Rate
GuelphOntarioEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
ReginaSaskatchewanFlat Rate (based on porperty size)
SaskatoonSaskatchewanEquivalent Residential Unit (ERU)
CalgaryAlbertaFlat Rate
EdmontonAlbertaIntensity Factor & Runoff Coefficient
Saint AlbertAlbertaFlat Rate
Strathcona CountyAlbertaFlat Rate
LangleyBritish ColumbiaStormwater Levy*
Pitt MeadowsBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
RichmondBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
SurreyBritish ColumbiaFlat Rate
VictoriaBritish ColumbiaImpervious Area
West VancouverBritish ColumbiaTiered Flat Rate
White RockBritish Columbia

I like how they call it a feature.
 
If you listen to the great NDP leader, we got to get rid of all the Corporate landlords and build more co-op housing.

Who does he think is going to build the co-op housing? Individuals or incorporated house building companies.
 
AND THEY ARE PRESENTING IT AS A TEAR-DOWN. 1.8 MIL. FOR A BUILDING LOT
Look at those massive monster stone cold looking boxes on both sides of it. What the heck are people thinking? No veranda, no charm, all wealth and no warmth. Just large and ostentatious.
 
I guess we’re going to find out just how much a province has to borrow before it blows up.
 
Honestly, these all seem like cop outs rather than solutions.
What part of relaxing land-use restriction to both densify and take advantage of a lower cost of building to quickly increase affordable supply (with a yard and driveway) is a copout?
 
What part of relaxing land-use restriction to both densify and take advantage of a lower cost of building to quickly increase affordable supply (with a yard and driveway) is a copout?
Was not specifically speaking to your point but I will address it.

It does not address the elephant in the room: density without infrastructure.

You still need proper water, sewage, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure to build these homes to make them viable. You still need roads and services to keep those residents happy. Those costs skyrocket when you build a trailer park, compared to an apartment/condo building.

Do I think that everyone wants to live in an urban setting? Heck no. The issue is that 10% of our national population lives within the GTA, and 50% lives in the Quebec City - Windsor Corridor. It is also one of the largest population densities in a Canada, where land is hella expensive and, in a lot of cases, already occupied.

That is also, where the vast majority of our labour market is, as we have crippled Oil, Gas, Mining, and agriculture industries outside of that pocket. People need to get to work where there are jobs. Having an afforable trailer park North of Sudbury is great, but no one wants a 4 hour commute.

Everything so far suggested in Canada seems like a brainstorming session held by 6th graders. No idea is a bad idea... but its ignoring the biggest problem first:

Overegulation of the construction industry, Overpopulation via immigration, and Overinflation due to government spending and runaway interest.

Until we have viable solutions that tackle those issues, yes, I will call those "plans" a cop out
 
If you fill in the ditch do you still have to pay the tax? Just a thought.

Have to admit I am not a fan of the "restrict international students to help with housing" plan. We need (as in the schools and the government visa office) to identify to these students the reality of expenses and the amount they need to have available to cover expenses. Instead of just restricting their numbers at least coord to restrict the overall immigration. You can't solve housing by building a lot less houses than people you allow to immigrate. The we will build afford housing mantra is a complete joke as they are not going to get a contractor in Toronto to build a house and then sell it for a few hundred grand when they can get a million plus for it. Even if they could you would just get flippers buying them and reselling for the millions.

Co-ops has been floated by some. From my experience that is simply a means to have the residents do some of the work in the area as they serve on committees and perform tasks to be members of the co-op. The rent charged was based on income so it basically became a slum as it filled with welfare and low-income earners that paid lip service to the committee participation.

Mobile homes - tried that too. If you are able to get a serviced lot at a reasonable price it could work in at least some areas. If you have to buy the trailer in a park though the benefit may not be there that is expected as you have the mortgage/loan payments along with the lot fee.
 
Back
Top