FJAG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 13,928
- Points
- 1,160
I know. Bloat is a government pandemic.Hard for the government to complain when it has bloated sharply the public service >30% in the last 8 years.
I know. Bloat is a government pandemic.Hard for the government to complain when it has bloated sharply the public service >30% in the last 8 years.
And where were these folks opinion when they were at the helm. Now we know about Admiral Norman, he got fired for trying to do something but I don't recall hearing the others speaking up in public on the news about the problems in the military. Ships didn't develop rust in the last 6 months, the CF18s' were getting old and there was no replacement in sight, recruitment (except during the first few years in Afghanistan) was steadily dropping etc, etc. The governments of Canada have been negligent for a long time and the leaders of our military have been negligent in not speaking out loud and often.Worth a watch...
Blunt talk on military challenges is a ‘good thing,’ retired defence chief says
Three retired Canadian defence leaders say chief of defence staff Gen. Wayne Eyre making the right move in sharing public statements about the challenges facing the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) around personnel shortages, aging equipment and operational readiness.
This level of candor is not usually seen among military leaders when it comes to sharing issues with the CAF, but retired Royal Canadian Air Force commander and former chief of defence staff Gen. Tom Lawson sees it as a positive.
“I think good, clear talk at this time is a good thing. And I did say earlier that I’m optimistic. I think him sharing some of these short–term problems helps him [Gen. Wayne Eyre] deal with it,” Lawson told The West Block host Mercedes Stephenson.
A lot of those complaints on Reddit are specifically about outdated equipment/tools.There are still so many things within the CAFs control that would make things better, but it's easier to blame equipment and budget cuts.
A quick look at the complaints on Reddit or the memes posted on CNN will give you a sense of what the problem really is. Sure it would be nice to have a shiny new toy to work with, but outdated equipment or tools were never at the top of my 'why i'm going to release' list.
A lot of those complaints on Reddit are specifically about outdated equipment/tools.
Surveys have to be read and acted upon; otherwise, they merely fill bookshelves and gather dust.It's almost as if a properly administered survey might help...
A lot of those complaints on Reddit are specifically about outdated equipment/tools.
How many people are still invested enough by the time they do an exit interview to give full answers vs. how many just want to get the thing over with and on their way?...and a decline in standards, unnecessary postings, etc.
There are exit interviews being completed are there not? CAF doesn't care as long as the empire of HQs isn't affected.
And since a large portion of folks think that exit interviews go into the round filing cabinet, what’s their incentive to provide full (or even correct) answers?How many people are still invested enough by the time they do an exit interview to give full answers vs. how many just want to get the thing over with and on their way?
actually anger and frustration are great incentives for truth. Unfortunately the interviewer often adds comments that negate the truths that he/she is hearingAnd since a large portion of folks think that exit interviews go into the round filing cabinet, what’s their incentive to provide full (or even correct) answers?
The vast majority of the public only think tanks, fighter jets and ships of some sort. HQ bloat - they have no idea what that is.I'd be happier if Eyre and the DM would start telling the country as to what they are doing to reduce the HQ bloat, creating more efficient processes and solving the problems facing DND/CAF. The continued bleating about needing more money is tiresome. Let's see an improvement in defence outputs with what they already have.
How many people are still invested enough by the time they do an exit interview to give full answers vs. how many just want to get the thing over with and on their way?
Inside the CAF, yes. Outside ignorance rules.The issues are well known and nothing should be a surprise.
The issues complained about the loudest are known, but the real issues could be something less obvious. That's why you do proper data collection, so you can properly diagnose and treat the problems, not just grease the squeaky wheels.The issues are well known and nothing should be a surprise.
They still do exit interviews? I thought employers dropped those years ago.There are exit interviews being completed are there not? CAF doesn't care as long as the empire of HQs isn't affected.
They still do exit interviews? I thought employers dropped those years ago.
Kind of interesting to see that only 7.8% get an official exit interview on why they left, but maybe they are referring to people completing the optional questionnaire, as that seems really low.
I released in 2018 after 41 and a bit years. No exit interview. And my DWD was a farce.They still do exit interviews? I thought employers dropped those years ago.
Re the TV interview. I found it disappointing. "BLUNT" it was not, especially from the Army fellow.Blunt talk on military challenges is a ‘good thing,’ retired defence chief says