- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 410
Bigmac said:In the modern battlefield the Med Techs must be up on both their trauma skills and soldiering. Although PCP training is fine for in Garrison duties it does not prepare the Med Techs for their true calling in battle. Civilian protocols are tossed out the window when you are dealing with multiple wounded while being fired upon by the enemy. Med Techs must all have ATLS as well as regular tactical casualty care training. If they emphasize trauma training and increased soldiering skills then they would definitely deserve spec pay.
I understand that by taking civilian paramedic courses makes it easier to compare jobs but there is no comparison. Med Techs are soldiers first and medical specialists second. I say stop trying to civilianize the Med Tech trade. The quest for civilian equivilancy could very well lead to Med Techs being replaced by soldiers with advanced medical skills such as ATLS and TCCC.
Don't get me wrong, I still believe Med Techs are extremely important. But with increased trauma skills and soldiering they will become invaluable assets and thus desrving of a higher payscale.
I couldn't disagree more. Without proper training, there would be no Med Tech. We'd still be using Cas Aids.
Nor would there be any thought of Spec. Pay, as we would be operating at a first aid level.
You seem to be advocating that PCP skills are no good, and first aid is only good for the battle field.
I don't understand how you can ask for civilian equivelent spec pay, then say Med Techs should be dumbed down
and not get spec pay.
If tactical training actually qualified someone for Spec pay, then everyone would get it.