- Reaction score
- 8,314
- Points
- 1,160
I thought the idea was to use NATO standard rounds. Just NATO navy rounds.Last I checked they were using NATO stand ammo.
I thought the idea was to use NATO standard rounds. Just NATO navy rounds.Last I checked they were using NATO stand ammo.
Swedish Archer in Ukraine, from arriving in site, to first round down range, 11 seconds.
To me it’s not Light, and while I see it useful for LAV/Stryker/Boxer wheeled armies, I don’t see it as the best option for true mech forces.Makes it, in my opinion a good high mobility howitzer for light or mechanized forces
I've made my comments about the Archer before and my view that it only carries 21 rounds on board. The Wikipedia page that says it has a (salvo fire rate of three rounds in 15 seconds (effective rate, 720 rounds per hour)) is just plain stupid. With the reload time between magazines, it can probably get off 80 rounds an hour at best - something that a good Canadian crew can do on an M777 in ten minutes. - But I digress.To me it’s not Light, and while I see it useful for LAV/Stryker/Boxer wheeled armies, I don’t see it as the best option for true mech forces.
I've made my comments about the Archer before and my view that it only carries 21 rounds on board. The Wikipedia page that says it has a (salvo fire rate of three rounds in 15 seconds (effective rate, 720 rounds per hour)) is just plain stupid. With the reload time between magazines, it can probably get off 80 rounds an hour at best - something that a good Canadian crew can do on an M777 in ten minutes. - But I digress.
I like anything with a 155/52 (not ready for a 58 calibre yet) - I'm not to concerned if the chassis is a Paladin, a K9, or something else so long as the crew can operate under armour and can be rapidly resupplied by a limber vehicle without having to expose oneself. I prefer tracked and just about everything now comes with self location and rapid emplacement and displacement. I'm not all that much against wheeled vehicles but I've been through enough soggy fields and deep snow to appreciate the advantage tracks can give a heavy vehicle like a 155 SP.
M109 seems like the best option, plus the upcoming M1299 variant has a 52 calibre barrel.H
To me it’s not Light, and while I see it useful for LAV/Stryker/Boxer wheeled armies, I don’t see it as the best option for true mech forces.
The K9 has a 52 calibre and BAE is working on a Paladin variantM109 seems like the best option, plus the upcoming M1299 variant has a 52 calibre barrel.
BAE Tests 52-Caliber Barrel on M109 Self-Propelled Howitzer
BAE Systems successfully fired 155 millimeter projectiles from a M109 Self-Propelled Howitzer modified with the Rheinmetall L52 155mm, 52-caliber cannon....www.defense-aerospace.com
The M1299 is the 52 calibre Paladin variant.The K9 has a 52 calibre and BAE is working on a Paladin variant
I think they are two separate options or programs.The M1299 is the 52 calibre Paladin variant.
Actually the M1299 uses an experimental L58 barrel. The current A7 Paladin has an L39 barrel.The M1299 is the 52 calibre Paladin variant.
The current plan is SPs for Latvia.f the M777 gets back in production we will probably just buy more of them
Well that is exciting. So many possibilities. Is it an UOR thing? Because otherwise it will be another 10 or 15 yearsThe current plan is SPs for Latvia.
I used to be Meh about the Archer. but really seems suited for these shoot and scoot missions. They would also fit the LAV battalions well.