I like both ends of the spectrum, obviously Hooks rock, the fatter and faster the better, but had a single flight in the M’egg and that thing was insane awesomeness…like you said, even hotter ride than the A’egg I was told by the CW5 making sure I didn’t stuff the M’egg into the ground.
That and it has the same engine as a 206 with less weight, means you can power out of bad spots as well. We used them a lot in mining exploration.
MILAN, of course.
To quote ,well to be honest every Prime Minister in Canadian History you're asking for more then they could give.
Sarcasm?
mil.in.ua
We sent more in the last week.
100% agree on the need for domestic munitions production (both smart and dumb) that can be scaled up when required.The more that I see of this war, the more convinced I am that we need to be a domestic supplier of most ammunitions even if that means we have factories that only produce a steady supply of our peacetime needs but also are paid to have the capability to rapidly ramp up war-time production.
I keep having this nagging feeling that we are being suckered into using up our (NATO's) war-stocks. The only thing calming me is the fact that if the OS reporting on Russian equipment casualties is half accurate then they aren't a big conventional threat anymore. That doesn't mean that they won't be in the future, even Russians learn from their mistakes, and then there's China and NK and Iran and a host of others who might do some local gathering of low hanging fruit while stocks are low.
I tend to be on the side of mistrusting adversaries but the Kumbaya days are over no matter how much Socks-Boy is yearning for them. There are really very few options as to how to interpret the writing on the wall. For me, deterrence requires an ability to project credible strength. If conventional forces are too expensive then maybe we should reconsider having our own force de frappe.
I’d suggest that having surge production in Canada needs to be a priority. Domestic production during peacetime when stocks are near full isn’t a necessity, as it can make sense to run just certain lines. But the ability needs to exist to do it.
Half a shit ton, is still a lot…
You know what’s more expensive than having a cutting edge military? Not having one…That doesn't mean that they won't be in the future, even Russians learn from their mistakes, and then there's China and NK and Iran and a host of others who might do some local gathering of low hanging fruit while stocks are low.
I tend to be on the side of mistrusting adversaries but the Kumbaya days are over no matter how much Socks-Boy is yearning for them. There are really very few options as to how to interpret the writing on the wall. For me, deterrence requires an ability to project credible strength. If conventional forces are too expensive then maybe we should reconsider having our own force de frappe.
From ?
Scraping the pavement in the City of Angels. 
)
