2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25
- Thread starter Fishbone Jones
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,959
- Points
- 1,190
I was addressing a very specific line of attack by the CPC, nothing more. No need to resort to whataboutism.
- Reaction score
- 5,560
- Points
- 1,260
Interesting graphic in the latest Angus Reid info-machine content ...
angusreid.org
Basically, what people think is more important is on the right, less important on the left. Red & Blue spots speak to which coach people think can manage the issues better.
I'm kinda intrigued to see so many people seeing Team Red best poised to deal with cost of living/inflation - here's a top three breakdown by party:
Also interesting to see self-identified Blue players (as an aggregate group) don't put tariffs in their top five.
Alt link if original one doesn't work for you.
Election 45: Carney preferred on top issues; Canadians divided on spend vs. cut; concern over foreign interference -
Canadians divided 51/49 on preference for spending on social programs vs. budget balancing cuts April 2, 2025 – The candidates are crisscrossing the country sharing their plans for housing affordability, dealing with President Donald Trump, economic growth, and other top issues. New data from...
angusreid.org
I'm kinda intrigued to see so many people seeing Team Red best poised to deal with cost of living/inflation - here's a top three breakdown by party:
Also interesting to see self-identified Blue players (as an aggregate group) don't put tariffs in their top five.
Alt link if original one doesn't work for you.
Fabius
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1,423
- Points
- 810
Interesting graphic in the latest Angus Reid info-machine content ...
Basically, what people think is more important is on the right, less important on the left. Red & Blue spots speak to which coach people think can manage the issues better.Election 45: Carney preferred on top issues; Canadians divided on spend vs. cut; concern over foreign interference -
Canadians divided 51/49 on preference for spending on social programs vs. budget balancing cuts April 2, 2025 – The candidates are crisscrossing the country sharing their plans for housing affordability, dealing with President Donald Trump, economic growth, and other top issues. New data from...
View attachment 92406
I'm kinda intrigued to see so many people seeing Team Red best poised to deal with cost of living/inflation - here's a top three breakdown by party:
View attachment 92407
Also interesting to see self-identified Blue players (as an aggregate group) don't put tariffs in their top five.
Alt link if original one doesn't work for you.
Seems like Canadians have a massive disconnect with reality on the linkages amongst the items on the X axis.
Also massive disconnects between root causes and effects.
Jarnhamar
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 8,705
- Points
- 1,160
I mean yes thats true, we discovered that by accident. Potentially we may have given out 25x $1m contracts to 1-person companies each studying the cure for cancer, or, how a specific colour makes someone feel when drinking coffee.
The problem is lack of tax payer oversight.
"Trust us" shouldnt cut it with any government, especially the current Liberal government.
I looked up an even dozen of those projects. Most are expansion efforts on existing fields. Not one I looked at adds any delivery capacity: as in no pipelines. And Carney has clearly stated that he has no intention of changing the act so companies can drill all they want but they will not get through all the hoops to enable delivery. Carney is 100% in favour of 0 by 2050
- Reaction score
- 1,761
- Points
- 1,260
Mine too.
Now, "inquiring minds" ( like romantic interests ) can avoid that by snooping around ones social media.
- Reaction score
- 25,203
- Points
- 1,360
Interesting graphic in the latest Angus Reid info-machine content ...
Basically, what people think is more important is on the right, less important on the left. Red & Blue spots speak to which coach people think can manage the issues better.Election 45: Carney preferred on top issues; Canadians divided on spend vs. cut; concern over foreign interference -
Canadians divided 51/49 on preference for spending on social programs vs. budget balancing cuts April 2, 2025 – The candidates are crisscrossing the country sharing their plans for housing affordability, dealing with President Donald Trump, economic growth, and other top issues. New data from...
View attachment 92406
I'm kinda intrigued to see so many people seeing Team Red best poised to deal with cost of living/inflation - here's a top three breakdown by party:
View attachment 92407
Also interesting to see self-identified Blue players (as an aggregate group) don't put tariffs in their top five.
Alt link if original one doesn't work for you.
Interesting that Angus-Reid chooses to put Carney up the positive Y axis, and Poilievre the negative Y axis, vice Carney left, Poilievre right X…and then importance to Canadians on the X instead of the up Y = more important.
A little angular rotation gives something that looks a bit less damning.
Some of the placements are interesting…and aren’t qualified at all…
You mean
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 4,056
- Points
- 1,210
No instead he stated if the provinces have completed their own assessment, that's good enough provincial projects by pass C69 entirely.
Fabius
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1,423
- Points
- 810
The Supreme Court as already in effect ruled that that is the case as Bill C69 was unconstitutional due to Federal overreach into provincial jurisdiction.
Some Liberal tinkering has not changed that.
- Reaction score
- 2,959
- Points
- 1,190
A bunch of you have been claiming that Carney. Is a terrible public speaker and that his popularity will decrease the more he opens his mouth. To me that implies that he is a BAD speaker. While I'm not convinced he's an "astute orator for the ages", I can't connect what you guys are saying with the few example I have seen of Carney talking, such as this one from tonight, to the press, without a teleprompter:
- Reaction score
- 31,597
- Points
- 1,090
Make that four...
www.ctvnews.ca
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
With the federal election less than a month away, the Conservative Party has dropped a fourth candidate in just two days – this time over alleged social media activity.
www.ctvnews.ca
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 18,106
- Points
- 1,260
Not a good look for the CPC - two maybe but four will sow seeds of doubt into swing voters minds.....
The devil you know....
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 4,056
- Points
- 1,210
4th candidate drops
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
www.ctvnews.ca
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
With the federal election less than a month away, the Conservative Party has dropped a fourth candidate in just two days – this time over alleged social media activity.
www.ctvnews.ca
Soooo….maybe getting that security clearance right about now would be a good idea to see what is going on in his own party?4th candidate drops
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
Conservatives drop fourth candidate in just two days over alleged social media activity
With the federal election less than a month away, the Conservative Party has dropped a fourth candidate in just two days – this time over alleged social media activity.
RangerRay
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,930
- Points
- 1,260
Glad to see them dropping their liabilities so quickly…
…but they need to work on their vetting processes. One would think that by 2025 parties would be able to vet candidates easier?
RangerRay
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,930
- Points
- 1,260
Or maybe they are trying to just stay ahead of things they know are coming.
Starting to think that there is a slow leak of info about compromised candidates. I mean the LPC has one that gets dropped then all of a sudden a flood gate of CPC ones that overshadow that one…
- Reaction score
- 5,684
- Points
- 1,160
You mean the NDA that muzzles his criticism? The continued use of "security clearance" by people who should know what a read-in NDA for a special program is really just cheap partisan shots instead of fact based criticism. If there was actual evidence of candidates being influenced, he'd be read in for specific issues relevant to his party, which could be the case here.
I'd rather he continue to vet, find and remove candidates. It's better than ignoring the problem for 5 days and refusing to disclose conflicts of interests. Really shows the contrast between decisive action to counter foreign influence and waffling to court an ethnic vote.
Similar threads
