• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25

I'm not sure of the attribution. I can't find much on Anita Duffy. And I don’t want to give trump credit. However, the article does give one pause, especially given the stance Carney is trying to pass off as a new direction for himself and everything he believes in.

"Trump’s "51st State" Comment: A Genius Strategy to Expose the WEF’s Control Over Canada
For weeks, the media has been in an uproar over President Donald Trump’s suggestion that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state. Predictably, Trudeau loyalists and the mainstream press wasted no time portraying Trump as a tyrant, claiming he’s looking to annex Canada against its will.
But step back and look deeper—Trump’s comment wasn’t just a random outburst. It was a strategic move designed to expose Canada’s real problem: the creeping control of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and globalist elites like Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau.
Why Trump Made the Statement
Trump is no fool. If he had simply said, “Canada is under the control of the WEF and globalists,” the media would have dismissed him as a conspiracy theorist. Canadians—already conditioned by state-funded media to distrust him—would have ignored the warning.
Instead, by suggesting that Canada should become the 51st state, he forced Trudeau’s government and the media into a corner. Suddenly, the same people who have been surrendering Canada’s sovereignty to the European Union (EU), China, and the WEF are now pretending to be outraged about the idea of Canada losing its independence.
The Hypocrisy Exposed
For years, Trudeau and Carney have pushed policies that erode Canadian sovereignty under the guise of “global cooperation”:
✅ Carbon taxes and energy restrictions designed to cripple Canada’s oil and gas industry, forcing reliance on WEF-controlled "green energy" policies. (Financial Post, Globe and Mail)
✅ Massive inflation and debt accumulation, ensuring Canada becomes economically dependent on global financial institutions. (National Post, Fraser Institute)
✅ Selling out to China and the EU, while actively participating in WEF-driven initiatives that diminish national identity. (Toronto Sun, Rebel News)
✅ Underfunding Canada’s military, ensuring we are defenseless in any real conflict. (National Post, True North)
✅ Banning firearms for law-abiding citizens while allowing criminals to run unchecked, ensuring that Canadians cannot fight back. (Toronto Sun, Epoch Times)
✅ Failing to meet NATO defense spending obligations, leaving Canada unable to defend itself, while relying on the U.S. to cover our security. (Globe and Mail, Financial Post)
Yet, the moment Trump suggests a U.S.-Canada merger, Trudeau and the media suddenly rediscover their love for Canadian sovereignty? That contradiction is exactly what Trump wanted to expose.
Trump’s Strategy: Force the Globalists to Defend Sovereignty They Were Destroying
The brilliance of Trump’s move is that it forces Trudeau, Carney, and the media to take a position they cannot sustain. If they truly cared about Canada’s independence, they wouldn’t be:
🔹 Pushing Canada closer to the EU and WEF-controlled policies (True North, National Post)
🔹 Surrendering economic power to international banking elites (Blacklock’s Reporter, Financial Post)
🔹 Allowing foreign influence from China while cracking down on Canadian freedoms (Globe and Mail, Epoch Times)
🔹 Weakening Canada’s military while relying on NATO without paying our fair share (Financial Post, Toronto Sun)
🔹 Disarming Canadians through gun bans while doing nothing to curb actual crime (Epoch Times, National Post)
By making Canada’s sovereignty a public debate, Trump has turned the spotlight on the very people responsible for undermining it. Now, Canadians who were blind to the WEF’s agenda are beginning to ask:
• If Trudeau is so concerned about sovereignty, why is he handing so much power to the WEF?
• If Carney cares about Canada’s future, why is he aligning it with EU-style economic policies instead of protecting Canadian industries?
• If we’re a sovereign nation, why are we disarming citizens while failing to fund our military?
• Why does Canada rely on the U.S. for security while failing to meet NATO spending commitments?
• Why is the media more outraged about Trump’s words than they are about Trudeau selling the country out to global elites?
What’s Next?
Trump has effectively forced the globalists into a no-win situation. If they keep pushing their WEF-aligned agenda, more Canadians will start questioning their real motives. If they backtrack and defend sovereignty, they expose their past actions as hypocrisy.
In the end, Trump’s statement wasn’t about actually annexing Canada—it was about forcing a conversation the globalists didn’t want to have. By making the Liberals and the media panic, he has exposed their contradictions, put them on the defensive, and opened the eyes of more Canadians to the reality of WEF control.
The Game Has Changed
The question is: Will Canadians wake up before it’s too late?"

Shared from Anita Duffy
Man, that’s a big tinfoil hat you’ve got there.
 
I would.
The fact women get older isn't a secret.

Poilievre isn't talking about careers. He's talking about middle age women facing difficulty starting a family when they can't afford a home. Is he wrong?


Yes, why not?


And then he would get criticized for steering clear of anything family related.
I’ve had this discussion with my daughter. It’s a tough balance getting through school, starting a career and getting a start in life, relationships, and having kids in prime age range. Lots of life events can interfere, but one thing is certain aging can’t be made up for later. Unreasonable people will be offended by that fact.
 
Newest CPC survey. Looks like they are asking for help in question 2

View attachment 92375
As a life long Tory - here would be my responses at this moment in time
1) No, I’m considering spoiling my ballot at this point
2) Stop sounding like a small town backwater hick by using words like ‘elitist’ and ‘globalist.’ The Conservative party is supposed to be ‘pro-business’ not some populist cult.
3) Unsure - explain how you are going to fund the CAF moving to 2-2.5% of GDP and tackle bringing down the Federal Deficit. Why are you not talking about citing our Corporation Tax rate to below the US rate to help encourage business investment which will lead to greater productivity?
4) Please explain what this means? Does this include all Rapists, Child molesters, first and second degree murders, etc, etc - unable to understand what this encompasses, too vague
5) I do NOT support lower taxes for Seniors. I support lower taxes for the 8% of Seniors that live in poverty and possibly the next 5-6% above them having lower taxes. I do NOT support lower taxes on the other 85%. This sounds too much like a NDP policy
6) If this is ONLY for first time homebuyers, where it’s also only the first time purchasing a house for ALL individuals listed on the mortgage and it’s a ONE TIME deal on the primary home.
7) Question is completely idiotic and not a question that provides an insight as to how the CAF would overall benefit from this.
8) I do not and will not be monetarily be supporting the CPC at this time as it’s lost touch with its roots.
 
Man, that’s a big tinfoil hat you’ve got there.

Nice. I just thought it was worth the read. But I've been called worse by better. Unlike you, I'm willing to look at most things and see what falls out. Being close minded is a hell of a way to go through life. Although you seem to be fooling people pretty well.
 
As a life long Tory - here would be my responses at this moment in time
1) No, I’m considering spoiling my ballot at this point
2) Stop sounding like a small town backwater hick by using words like ‘elitist’ and ‘globalist.’ The Conservative party is supposed to be ‘pro-business’ not some populist cult.
3) Unsure - explain how you are going to fund the CAF moving to 2-2.5% of GDP and tackle bringing down the Federal Deficit. Why are you not talking about citing our Corporation Tax rate to below the US rate to help encourage business investment which will lead to greater productivity?
4) Please explain what this means? Does this include all Rapists, Child molesters, first and second degree murders, etc, etc - unable to understand what this encompasses, too vague
5) I do NOT support lower taxes for Seniors. I support lower taxes for the 8% of Seniors that live in poverty and possibly the next 5-6% above them having lower taxes. I do NOT support lower taxes on the other 85%. This sounds too much like a NDP policy
6) If this is ONLY for first time homebuyers, where it’s also only the first time purchasing a house for ALL individuals listed on the mortgage and it’s a ONE TIME deal on the primary home.
7) Question is completely idiotic and not a question that provides an insight as to how the CAF would overall benefit from this.
8) I do not and will not be monetarily be supporting the CPC at this time as it’s lost touch with its roots.


So if carney admits to and calls himself an elitist and globalist, in public, it's wrong for anyone to repeat it? Is carney a backwater hick? He certainly doesn’t seem to be.
 
Nice. I just thought it was worth the read. But I've been called worse by better. Unlike you, I'm willing to look at most things and see what falls out. Being close minded is a hell of a way to go through life. Although you seem to be fooling people pretty well.
Not close minded at all.
Some of those items are legit and do hold merit, some are grasping at straws and don’t represent the old CPC that I grew up with and respected (as well as held elected positions within). Today they sound more and more like the NDP and are gathering up and catering to former NDP supporters. I can’t understand this nor support it.
 
Carney standing by candidate Paul Chiang, who suggested Conservative be turned over to China for bounty

A teachable moment? Sure... you know what the lesson was? Don't threaten your opposition with abduction at the behest of another country; goodbye.

There's no place in any part of Canadian society or democracy for this kind of messaging. Then again, we know which party gained the most the last time the Chinese got involved.

Well Carney lost me there.

The article now says the RCMP is investigating. This is gonna get smellier.
 
Here is a running tally of policy announcements in this election;

My key takeaway from this election so far is that no party or leader is seriously concerned about Canada’s situation. No one has presented a clear vision nor a unified plan to get to that vision. It’s just some disconnected thoughts that are largely either ill informed or grossly overblown as to the likely impact.

Unless something changes quickly it will be a very unserious election despite the domestic and geopolitical situation and issues.

Edited to add:
Better tracker here:
 
Not close minded at all.
Some of those items are legit and do hold merit, some are grasping at straws and don’t represent the old CPC that I grew up with and respected (as well as held elected positions within). Today they sound more and more like the NDP and are gathering up and catering to former NDP supporters. I can’t understand this nor support it.
I mean no disrespect to you, but how on Earth did you draw any similarity between the CPC and the NDP??

If that statement was true, I wouldn't support it in the slightest either.

But the NDP has sold out it's voters by throwing their party behind the LPC to keep them in power regardless of what they do, in exchange for a few breadcrumbs from time to time...

The CPC has been doing their best to fight the left-wing uni-party for the last few years.


I don't see how the CPC & NDP look remotely alike...



(People mention the modern CPC isn't the same party they grew up with. But holy hell, the NDP is looking just a wee bit different than it did when Mr. Layton was at the wheel! Now THAT is a party that's lost it's way...)
 
Well Carney lost me there.

The article now says the RCMP is investigating. This is gonna get smellier.
I wish I could agree with you on this. You have no idea how badly I want to agree with you on this! (Re things will be getting smelling now that the RCMP is investing)

This guy is a former cop, who has already taken accountability for his silly statement & stepped down from the race.

Maybe it was sarcastic. Maybe it wasn't. (Either way, it's a great example of someone saying something stupid & it immediately knocking them off their desired career path...)


I doubt it will get smellier. If the last 10 years are anything to go off of, the RCMP won't do jack shit - they've gotten good whiffs of WAY smellier things than this, and done literally nothing about it...

The media cycle will just keep plugging away, and people will forget all about this guy in a week. I guarantee it.
 
I mean no disrespect to you, but how on Earth did you draw any similarity between the CPC and the NDP??

If that statement was true, I wouldn't support it in the slightest either.

But the NDP has sold out it's voters by throwing their party behind the LPC to keep them in power regardless of what they do, in exchange for a few breadcrumbs from time to time...

The CPC has been doing their best to fight the left-wing uni-party for the last few years.


I don't see how the CPC & NDP look remotely alike...



(People mention the modern CPC isn't the same party they grew up with. But holy hell, the NDP is looking just a wee bit different than it did when Mr. Layton was at the wheel! Now THAT is a party that's lost it's way...)
Look at the numbers the CPC is pulling in areas like Hamilton. They are gathering NDP supporters not pulling from the Liberals.
People I know from primary school down in Windsor are suddenly supporting the CPC, people who voted NDP their whole auto worker unionized life.
 
Look at the numbers the CPC is pulling in areas like Hamilton. They are gathering NDP supporters not pulling from the Liberals.
People I know from primary school down in Windsor are suddenly supporting the CPC, people who voted NDP their whole auto worker unionized life.

I too have seen shift in who I thought would expected NDP voters who are now behind the CPC.

But I think the CPC has done a lot to make itself the choice for the middle class blue collar worker. That sheen may have worn off a bit.
 
We've had quite the run badmouthing anything to do with masculinity. But pointing out biological truths is somehow obscene.
It's about the difference between masculinity and toxic masculinity. Like being a soldier, you can be a good one with or without being or sounding like a dick. The "how" makes a difference.
Good to see - interesting to see what the RCMP look-see leads to as well.
 
Back
Top