2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25

[Jarnhamar]

Go tell any female coworker they should go buy a house and have kids because their biological clock is ticking and let me know how the meeting with HR goes.

If you had a 40 year old female coworker who was renting and contemplating waiting until she was 50 to start having kids would you tell her that was a good idea?

 

[SupersonicMax]

If you had a 40 year old female coworker who was renting and contemplating waiting until she was 50 to start having kids would you tell her that was a good idea?

Sure I would. But I would not say “because your biological clock is ticking”

 

[MilEME09]

If you had a 40 year old female coworker who was renting and contemplating waiting until she was 50 to start having kids would you tell her that was a good idea?

It's none of my business if or when someone has kids, and it's not the governments either.

Just like it wasn't any business of a doctor to try and convince my wife not to get her tube's removed because what if I and my kids all died and she wanted to start over. Dead serious it happened, couldn't file a complaint fast enough

 

[brihard]

Do you mention biological clocks when giving career advice to women?

Heck would you mention biological clocks at all for anything to women at all let alone publicly?

The CPC should steer clear of anything family planning related.

It was one of those things where the point he’s making is valid and even a really strong thing to campaign on, but his choice of wording is basically awful because of the dog whistles it conjures. There’s like 50 different and better ways he could have worded it that would have conveyed the same policy message without the implicit ‘women as breeders’ baggage.

“Biological clock is running out” is just not a string of words any politician will ever improve their lot by uttering. Dumb unforced error on a day where all he needed to do was take a hard swing at the t-ball post.

 

[FSTO]

It was one of those things where the point he’s making is valid and even a really strong thing to campaign on, but his choice of wording is basically awful because of the dog whistles it conjures. There’s like 50 different and better ways he could have worded it that would have conveyed the same policy message without the implicit ‘women as breeders’ baggage.

“Biological clock is running out” is just not a string of words any politician will ever improve their lot by uttering. Dumb unforced error on a day where all he needed to do was take a hard swing at the t-ball post.

I watched both evening politcal shows and the “clock” wasn’t brought up. The “bounty” took all the oxygen today.
I agree that PP dodged a bullet though.

 

[Jarnhamar]

It's none of my business if or when someone has kids, and it's not the governments either.

Just like it wasn't any business of a doctor to try and convince my wife not to get her tube's removed because what if I and my kids all died and she wanted to start over. Dead serious it happened, couldn't file a complaint fast enough

So your worker asks you for advice and you turn around and make it about yourself? Geez fella

 

[HavokFour]

Should absolutely turf him, when his opponent is actually wanted for pro democracy activism, this was just wrong on so many levels, and to me says he is pro china to the point he would sell out canadians to please china. Not someone I want in parliament, turf him and find someone new.

Meanwhile, how to lose women voters in one poorly worded statement

https://twitter.com/x/status/1906783309868442000

A masterful display on giving the "ick" to women countrywide. Of all the ways he could have worded what he wanted to say, he chose possibly one of the worst. In other places I'm already seeing people reference his 2022 blunder with a certain tag he was using on a lot of his videos.

 

[mariomike]

18% when we have 27 million eligible voters is enough to swing an election if even 5% switch votes.

Interesting.


Saw this about that in today's news.

QUOTE

March 31, 2025
Angus Reid Institute

Election 2025: Incumbent lead holds as CPC edge among men dwarfed by Liberal advantage among women​

CPC leads by two points among men, Liberals lead by 19 points among women​

Election 2025: Incumbent lead holds as CPC edge among men dwarfed by Liberal advantage among women -

CPC leads by two points among men, Liberals lead by 19 points among women March 31, 2025 – In a campaign that has been remarkable for its volatility and dynamism, a new element enters the race: relative stability. New data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute finds voter intention unchanged...

angusreid.org

END QUOTE

 

[MilEME09]

So your worker asks you for advice and you turn around and make it about yourself? Geez fella

The point is if you sound like a misogynistic ass, people aren't going to be happy or support you

 

[Jarnhamar]

Sure I would. But I would not say “because your biological clock is ticking”

How would you word it?

I'll concede maybe I'm letting being pragmatic get into the way of being tactful.

 

[Jarnhamar]

The point is if you sound like a misogynistic ass, people aren't going to be happy or support you

Trudeau assaulted a woman at a party. Sexual assault by today's standards. He then said she "experienced" it differently. 6 months after teary eyed saying women need to be believes. Trudeaus support from women didn't waiver. People will find whatever reasons to justify supporting or not supporting a candidate.

If women are going to poo poo because Poilievre used the same term doctors and health professionals use, chest la vie.

 

[brihard]

Trudeau assaulted a woman at a party. Sexual assault by today's standards. He then said she "experienced" it differently. 6 months after teary eyed saying women need to be believes. Trudeaus support from women didn't waiver. People will find whatever reasons to justify supporting or not supporting a candidate.

If women are going to poo poo because Poilievre used the same term doctors and health professionals use, chest la vie.

"Young couples hoping they can afford both a home and a family"

"Young couples who want to grow a family, but can't afford to house one"

"Canadians who can't afford a home to raise their kids in"

"Young Canadian couples who have room in their hearts for kids, but don't have a room in their home for them"

Etc etc. That was all immediately off the top of my head.

 

[dapaterson]

“Biological clock is running out” is just not a string of words any politician will ever improve their lot by uttering. Dumb unforced error on a day where all he needed to do was take a hard swing at the t-ball post.

 

[brihard]

The perfect gif doesn’t exi-

 

[Jarnhamar]

Election 2025: Incumbent lead holds as CPC edge among men dwarfed by Liberal advantage among women​

CPC leads by two points among men, Liberals lead by 19 points among women​

Let's connect the dots here.

We all seen the hillariously abysmal GDP growth- 1.4%. 50 or 60 countries ahead of us.

Slipped from 5th to 18th in happiness.

Record levels of Canadians using food banks.

Record levels of Canadians living pay check to pay check.

Compliments of the Liberals in power for 10 years.


Now, women make up 51% of Canada's population and the majority of women vote Liberal and NDP.


Is our lack of happiness, food supply, and money problems the result of women's voting choices?

 

[Fabius]

It's none of my business if or when someone has kids, and it's not the governments either.

At an individual level I would say that statement is correct but it’s wrong at a societal level.

A country and its national government needs to care about the birth rate, that’s tied to immigration levels, and a bunch of things.
If the birth rate is skewed in some manner generally the government on behalf of society tries to offer incentives to bring it back in balance.

Interestingly the LPC has likely poisoned that entire subject so extensively, that among the political parties only they could have a discussion around this topic.

 

[brihard]

At an individual level I would say that statement is correct but it’s wrong at a societal level.

A country and its national government needs to care about the birth rate, that’s tied to immigration levels, and a bunch of things.
If the birth rate is skewed in some manner generally the government on behalf of society tries to offer incentives to bring it back in balance.

Interestingly the LPC has likely poisoned that entire subject so extensively, that among the political parties only they could have a discussion around this topic.

No, it’s perfectly possible to have an informed and nuanced discussion around it. You just not have to be friggin’ weird or paternalistic in how you talk about it. Not only is it utterly unnecessary to talk about women’s biology directly, but the subject of affordability in the context of growing families goes well beyond that one anspect anyway.

 

[Fishbone Jones]

I'm not sure of the attribution. I can't find much on Anita Duffy. And I don’t want to give trump credit. However, the article does give one pause, especially given the stance Carney is trying to pass off as a new direction for himself and everything he believes in.

"Trump’s "51st State" Comment: A Genius Strategy to Expose the WEF’s Control Over Canada
For weeks, the media has been in an uproar over President Donald Trump’s suggestion that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state. Predictably, Trudeau loyalists and the mainstream press wasted no time portraying Trump as a tyrant, claiming he’s looking to annex Canada against its will.
But step back and look deeper—Trump’s comment wasn’t just a random outburst. It was a strategic move designed to expose Canada’s real problem: the creeping control of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and globalist elites like Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau.
Why Trump Made the Statement
Trump is no fool. If he had simply said, “Canada is under the control of the WEF and globalists,” the media would have dismissed him as a conspiracy theorist. Canadians—already conditioned by state-funded media to distrust him—would have ignored the warning.
Instead, by suggesting that Canada should become the 51st state, he forced Trudeau’s government and the media into a corner. Suddenly, the same people who have been surrendering Canada’s sovereignty to the European Union (EU), China, and the WEF are now pretending to be outraged about the idea of Canada losing its independence.
The Hypocrisy Exposed
For years, Trudeau and Carney have pushed policies that erode Canadian sovereignty under the guise of “global cooperation”:
Carbon taxes and energy restrictions designed to cripple Canada’s oil and gas industry, forcing reliance on WEF-controlled "green energy" policies. (Financial Post, Globe and Mail)
Massive inflation and debt accumulation, ensuring Canada becomes economically dependent on global financial institutions. (National Post, Fraser Institute)
Selling out to China and the EU, while actively participating in WEF-driven initiatives that diminish national identity. (Toronto Sun, Rebel News)
Underfunding Canada’s military, ensuring we are defenseless in any real conflict. (National Post, True North)
Banning firearms for law-abiding citizens while allowing criminals to run unchecked, ensuring that Canadians cannot fight back. (Toronto Sun, Epoch Times)
Failing to meet NATO defense spending obligations, leaving Canada unable to defend itself, while relying on the U.S. to cover our security. (Globe and Mail, Financial Post)
Yet, the moment Trump suggests a U.S.-Canada merger, Trudeau and the media suddenly rediscover their love for Canadian sovereignty? That contradiction is exactly what Trump wanted to expose.
Trump’s Strategy: Force the Globalists to Defend Sovereignty They Were Destroying
The brilliance of Trump’s move is that it forces Trudeau, Carney, and the media to take a position they cannot sustain. If they truly cared about Canada’s independence, they wouldn’t be:
Pushing Canada closer to the EU and WEF-controlled policies (True North, National Post)
Surrendering economic power to international banking elites (Blacklock’s Reporter, Financial Post)
Allowing foreign influence from China while cracking down on Canadian freedoms (Globe and Mail, Epoch Times)
Weakening Canada’s military while relying on NATO without paying our fair share (Financial Post, Toronto Sun)
Disarming Canadians through gun bans while doing nothing to curb actual crime (Epoch Times, National Post)
By making Canada’s sovereignty a public debate, Trump has turned the spotlight on the very people responsible for undermining it. Now, Canadians who were blind to the WEF’s agenda are beginning to ask:
• If Trudeau is so concerned about sovereignty, why is he handing so much power to the WEF?
• If Carney cares about Canada’s future, why is he aligning it with EU-style economic policies instead of protecting Canadian industries?
• If we’re a sovereign nation, why are we disarming citizens while failing to fund our military?
• Why does Canada rely on the U.S. for security while failing to meet NATO spending commitments?
• Why is the media more outraged about Trump’s words than they are about Trudeau selling the country out to global elites?
What’s Next?
Trump has effectively forced the globalists into a no-win situation. If they keep pushing their WEF-aligned agenda, more Canadians will start questioning their real motives. If they backtrack and defend sovereignty, they expose their past actions as hypocrisy.
In the end, Trump’s statement wasn’t about actually annexing Canada—it was about forcing a conversation the globalists didn’t want to have. By making the Liberals and the media panic, he has exposed their contradictions, put them on the defensive, and opened the eyes of more Canadians to the reality of WEF control.
The Game Has Changed
The question is: Will Canadians wake up before it’s too late?"

Shared from Anita Duffy

 

[Remius]

Newest CPC survey. Looks like they are asking for help in question 2

 

[QV]

The point is if you sound like a misogynistic ass, people aren't going to be happy or support you

We've had quite the run badmouthing anything to do with masculinity. But pointing out biological truths is somehow obscene.