Talk:Armour: Difference between revisions
From Milnet.ca Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Information is easier to find if we apply a common template. | Information is easier to find if we apply a common template. | ||
Any thoughts? [[User:DAPaterson]] | Any thoughts? [[User:DAPaterson|DAPaterson]] 11:56, 23 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
:George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT) | :George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."[[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 23 May 2006
Do we need a standard template for the Arms pages? The Infantry and Engineer pages include the list of units on the main page; the Armd corps has a distinct "Regiments" page.
Information is easier to find if we apply a common template.
Any thoughts? DAPaterson 11:56, 23 May 2006 (EDT)
- George has been resisting a move to a common template; I agree with you but for now it looks like the Armour stuff is "doing its own thing."Michael Dorosh 14:16, 23 May 2006 (EDT)
