Category talk:Army Formations: Difference between revisions
From Milnet.ca Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't have the ref infront of me to confirm, but I do not think that LFC, MARCOM, CEFCOM, etc are considered formations. Though technically meeting the definition, they are instead reffered to as "commands" | I don't have the ref infront of me to confirm, but I do not think that LFC, MARCOM, CEFCOM, etc are considered formations. Though technically meeting the definition, they are instead reffered to as "commands" [[User:McG]] | ||
:I think I placed them there just to show the heirarchy, but it does look confusing doesn't it. I wanted to show Army formations reporting to the commands - ie LFC has various formations under command. If you or anyone else wants to edit it, please do - just threw this up as a start point.[[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 13:45, 20 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:45, 20 June 2006
I don't have the ref infront of me to confirm, but I do not think that LFC, MARCOM, CEFCOM, etc are considered formations. Though technically meeting the definition, they are instead reffered to as "commands" User:McG
- I think I placed them there just to show the heirarchy, but it does look confusing doesn't it. I wanted to show Army formations reporting to the commands - ie LFC has various formations under command. If you or anyone else wants to edit it, please do - just threw this up as a start point.Michael Dorosh 13:45, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
