• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Robert Mueller just flipped his third former Trump aide

mariomike

Army.ca Legend
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Mentor
Reaction score
105
Points
780
OP: Retired AF Guy

Rick Gates — Paul Manafort’s right-hand man — is now cooperating with the Russia investigation.
By Andrew Prokopandrew@vox.com Updated Feb 23, 2018, 4:00pm EST

Special counsel Robert Mueller just flipped another former Trump staffer. Rick Gates — Paul Manafort’s longtime junior business partner and a 2016 Trump campaign aide — agreed to a plea deal in Mueller’s investigation Friday afternoon in which he’ll cooperate with the probe.

Gates pleaded to one count of conspiracy against the United States and one count of making false statements to the FBI. In exchange, other charges related to money laundering, acting as an unregistered foreign agent, and making other false statements will be dropped. Here are his statement of offense and plea agreement. Though Gates pleaded not guilty after he was first indicted last October, he’s increasingly been looking at an expensive legal defense with no end in sight and a potential decades-long prison sentence — particularly since Mueller filed a dizzying new set of tax, financial, and bank fraud charges against him and Manafort just yesterday.

“Despite my initial desire to vigorously defend myself, I have had a change of heart,” Gates wrote in a letter to his friends and family obtained by ABC News. “I will better serve my family moving forward by exiting this process.”

Manafort, meanwhile, released a statement criticizing Gates. “I had hoped and expected my business colleague would have had the strength to continue the battle to prove our innocence,” the statement reads. “For reasons yet to surface he chose to do otherwise.”

The question, now, is precisely what Gates’s cooperation would entail. That is: Is it mainly bad news for Manafort? Or does it have even bigger implications for the investigation into Russian interference as a whole, and into President Trump specifically?

Because if Manafort were to know of anything that could implicate Trump in connection with Russia, it seems quite plausible Gates would know it too.

Who is Rick Gates?

Basically, Gates is Paul Manafort’s protégé and right-hand man, who was at his side during his past decade of lobbying and foreign work, before going with him to join the Trump campaign.

Manafort, who is two decades older than Gates, had worked for Republican politicians, controversial dictators, and corporate interests before his career took a turn in the mid-2000s. He “all but vanished from the Washington scene” and began focusing on business activities in Eastern Europe, as Politico later reported. This began with advising work for the Russian oligarch and aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska, and soon moved into the political realm with advising work for the Party of Regions — Ukraine’s pro-Russian political party — and its leader, Viktor Yanukovych.

Gates joined Manafort’s firm in 2006 and began managing much of its Eastern Europe portfolio soon afterward, often working out of Kiev, according to the New York Times. In particular, Gates was to run a new private equity company called Pericles that Manafort was starting, to fund investments in Ukraine and Russia.

But in recent years, these business ventures went awry. President Yanukovych was forced to flee Ukraine due to protests and clashes over his pro-Russian policies. Pericles, meanwhile, collapsed in a messy legal battle, as Deripaska, its leading funder, accused Manafort and Gates of cheating him of millions. (An essential recent profile of Manafort by Franklin Foer in the Atlantic has more details on the pair’s Ukrainian work.)

Then, as part of an effort from Donald Trump to professionalize his presidential campaign, he brought Manafort aboard in March 2016. With Manafort came Gates. And as the original campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, saw his star fall, Manafort’s portfolio gradually expanded until he was effectively running the whole operation. In mid-May, Manafort was officially named campaign chair and chief strategist.

Though Trump fired Manafort in August 2016, Gates stayed on with the campaign through the general election, and later served on Trump’s inaugural committee and worked at a pro-Trump outside group until March 2017.

What was Rick Gates indicted for?

On October 30, 2017, in the first public indictments of Mueller’s investigation, Manafort and Gates were charged with a total of 12 counts.

The gist of the charges was that Manafort and Gates “acted as unregistered agents” of the government of Ukraine and Ukrainian politicians, generating “tens of millions of dollars in income,” which they then “laundered” through “scores of United States and foreign corporations, partnerships, and bank accounts.” You can read the full indictment here.

It’s helpful to think of the charges in two separate but related buckets: One is money laundering, and the second is false statements or failure to disclosure foreign work.

On the money laundering front, Manafort and Gates were both charged with a broader “conspiracy to launder money” and separate specific charges on their failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts.
Then there are the false statements and failure to disclose charges.

They are:

Acting as an unregistered agent of the government of Ukraine, its president, and one of its major political parties
Making false and misleading statements under the Foreign Agents Registration Act related to that Ukraine work
Then on Thursday, Mueller filed a new 32-count set of charges against Manafort and Gates in a separate venue (the Eastern District of Virginia). These include filing false individual income tax returns, bank fraud, and bank fraud conspiracy.

Now, these charges don’t necessarily seem to have anything to do with potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia — Mueller’s main investigative job.

But he likely saw these separate charges against Manafort and Gates as a means to this end. The stronger the evidence he has against either or both of them, the more pressure he can exert to get them to cooperate in the probe into Russian interference.

Gates in particular is far younger than Manafort (he’s only 45), and he has young children. So though he pleaded not guilty at first, speculation almost immediately began over whether he might flip to avoid a long prison sentence.

And now he has done so. The plea agreement lists much of what was alleged in the previous indictment against Gates, but boils it down to two charges:

The first is “conspiracy against the United States” — by which Mueller means, Gates defrauded the government by hiding his foreign income and work.

The second is a false statements charge. Gates admits lying to the FBI on the very recent date of February 1, 2018, when he was asked what Manafort had told him about a 2013 meeting he had had with a member of Congress — apparently Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA).

Is Gates flipping just on Manafort — or also on Trump?

The big question, though, is just what this flipping might entail — and whom Gates might implicate.
It is possible that Gates’s cooperation would primarily be useful to Mueller as a means to pressure Manafort further. After all, Gates certainly has in-depth knowledge about Manafort’s activities over the past decade-plus. His cooperation could make it easier to make a case against Manafort — or to get Manafort himself to flip.
But there are other possibilities as well.

After all, Gates worked on the Trump campaign. And unlike cooperator George Papadopoulos, he actually had a high-level job there, which had him work quite closely with the person running the campaign for several months: Manafort.

For instance, there have been recent reports that Mueller is keenly interested in the White House’s story about the June 9, 2016, meeting Donald Trump Jr. arranged with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower for the purpose of getting “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

Gates wasn’t at that meeting — but Manafort was. And if anything inappropriate involving Russian interference with the campaign did happen there, one person Manafort just might tell could be his close friend and business partner of more than a decade, Rick Gates.

That is to say that while Gates’s potential cooperation could just be about providing information on Manafort’s business, it’s not out of the question that it’s about providing information on potential collusion with Russia.
It is also worth noting that Mueller has also looked closely into events during the transition period after Trump won but before he was sworn in. And while Gates didn’t officially work on the transition, he worked as the deputy chair of Trump’s inaugural committee, so he was in the president-elect’s orbit at the time.

So now that Gates has flipped, the bigger picture is that Mueller has three former Trump aides — that we know of — cooperating and providing him with information. If criminal collusion with Russia did happen, that would put the special counsel in a better position than ever to uncover it.



Article Link

Actual Indictment Against Gates
Modify message



 

Fishbone Jones

Army.ca Myth
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
59
Points
530
the problem, as we saw with Flynn, is that the cost to defend yourself against the government, is enormous. the trials last for ages. the lawyer bills and stress accumulate to the  point of family and fortune destruction.

Oft times the charges will be plea bargained down to something like lying to the feds.

It'll let Mueller record a guilty verdict and the plaintiff can put it behind him and try put his life back together.

The problem is though, none of the original collusion charges are proven, so you end up with Mueller now recording two convictions in the Russian collusion case against Trump, but there is no proof of collusion in either case. All they got Gates on is income tax evasion and lying to the FBI about it. I feel that if Mueller had the goods, he'd not have plea bargained it. He'd be going for prison time.

The Crown does the same thing here in Canada. you can choose loss of your family and finances or swallow your pride and take the bogus hit.  .
 

a_majoor

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
5
Points
430
It may be that General Flynn at least may withdraw his guilty plea. I will link two articles by the "Gateway Pundit" and one by "The Federalist" with the details, but perhaps the most damning piece of information is this:

http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/report-andrew-mccabe-altered-peter-strzoks-302-notes-general-flynn-interview-destroyed-evidence/

Investigative journalist Mike Cernovich dropped a hot story on Sunday night. According to Mike, former Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Andrew McCabe altered far left FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s notes on his interview with General Michael Flynn. And then McCabe destroyed the evidence.

If this is true and can be proven, then the "investigation" is a tissue of lies and falsehoods from top to bottom, meaning that every charge being laid is likely meaningless or a result of "the fruit of the poisoned tree".
Read the rest:

http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/report-andrew-mccabe-altered-peter-strzoks-302-notes-general-flynn-interview-destroyed-evidence/

http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/judges-unnoticed-order-reveals-something-fascinating-gen-flynn-motion-withdraw-guilty-plea-likely-works/

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/michael-flynns-plea-reversal-uncover-federal-corruption/
 

Retired AF Guy

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
12
Points
430
recceguy said:
The problem is though, none of the original collusion charges are proven, so you end up with Mueller now recording two convictions in the Russian collusion case against Trump, but there is no proof of collusion in either case. All they got Gates on is income tax evasion and lying to the FBI about it. I feel that if Mueller had the goods, he'd not have plea.


Part of Mueller's mandate is that he can also investigate any other crimes he uncovers during his investigation into Russian collusion. It's very possible that these latest crimes have nothing to do with the ongoing Russian investigation.
 

beirnini

Jr. Member
Reaction score
0
Points
0
recceguy said:
The Crown does the same thing here in Canada. you can choose loss of your family and finances or swallow your pride and take the bogus hit.  .
Are you suggesting that the team Mueller has assembled built their careers on putting the innocent on trial?

Like Enron? Arthur Andersen? Volkswagen? Richard Nixon? Banks involved in LIBOR? Petrobas? Vincent "the Chin" Gigante? Citigroup and other banks involved in the Global Financial Crisis?

C'mon.
 

Fishbone Jones

Army.ca Myth
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
59
Points
530
beirnini said:
Are you suggesting that the team Mueller has assembled built their careers on putting the innocent on trial?

Like Enron? Arthur Andersen? Volkswagen? Richard Nixon? Banks involved in LIBOR? Petrobas? Vincent "the Chin" Gigante? Citigroup and other banks involved in the Global Financial Crisis?

C'mon.

Considering what we now know of the DNC, Hillary campaign, the dossier, the FBI and DOJ from the Obama years, why not? The democrats are looking like nothing but gold diggers, liars and thieves.

If you're suggesting that some prosecutors don't resort to malice, you have more faith in human nature that I.

C'mon.

HAGO :salute:
 

beirnini

Jr. Member
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I'm not relying on "faith" in the humanity of "some" prosecutors; their entire body of work is a matter of public record. If you want to support the assertion that Mueller's team or their professional conduct are in any way "bogus" I would suggest you start there, instead of relying poorly-sourced and supported partisan conjecture.
 

Fishbone Jones

Army.ca Myth
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
59
Points
530
I still disagree with you.

I'm not debating it, simply because I don't spend much time here anymore and no sense wasting it arguing  with you when neither of us will change.

So I'll leave you to whatever.
 
Top