Obama pledges to keep US military as the "strongest on the planet"

[CougarKing]

Hopefully this won't be dismissed by critics as just more talk, although this was also one of his campaign promises, IIRC.

From the AFP:

Obama vows to keep military 'strongest on the planet'

WASHINGTON (AFP) — President-elect Barack Obama rode a wave of anti-war sentiment to the White House but he vowed to maintain "the strongest military on the planet."

Democrats who would like to turn guns into butter, particularly during an economic crisis, may be disappointed.

But Obama, in his choice of national security advisers and the priorities he set for them at a press event in Chicago, signalled that he intends to move cautiously during "an unprecedented transition amidst two wars."

He retained Defense Secretary Robert Gates , praising him for his handling of "a difficult situation" in Iraq but soft peddling their differences over the pace of a US withdrawal.

"I think all of us here share the belief that we have to maintain the strongest military on the planet, that we have to support our troops and make sure that they are properly trained, properly equipped, that they are provided with a mission that allows them to succeed," he said.

On the stage with him stood a team of advisers that, besides Gates, included his Democratic rival for the presidency, Hillary Clinton , who campaigned on her readiness to lead in a crisis.

For his national security adviser, Obama chose retired general Jim Jones , a man with extensive military experience, a feel for diplomacy and close ties to moderate Republicans like Senator John McCain, who lost the presidential race to Obama.

"I don't think the message is so much clean break or not clean break, the message is reasoned pragmatism," said Stephen Biddle, an expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.

"There have been fears in some corridors that Obama was going to be a left wing ideologue; the McCain campaign was trying to portray him that way," he said.

"And I think especially in a time of war and financial crisis the administration is trying to convey the idea that they're not going to do extreme things in either direction," he said.

"They're going to be pragmatic, reasonable, they're going to emphasize expertise over ideology, in foreign policy and defense as well as domestic policy and economics," he said.

Michael O'Hanlon, an expert at the Brookings Institution, said there were also concerns that foreign powers -- Russia, perhaps, or Iran -- might want to test Obama early in his term.

"He's got to make it clear that he is not (to be) pushed around," he said.

Obama stressed the importance of coupling a strong military with diplomacy and renewed attention to alliances.

But he is inheriting a military whose ground forces have been strained to the maximum by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with combat units in their third and fourth deployments with only a year in between.

Although it's probably the most battle hardened counter-insurgency force in the world today, US military leaders have warned it is ill prepared to respond to crises elsewhere.

"The army is in terrible shape, in terms of the quality of the people they are taking in, and they are losing a lot of their middle grade officers and their future leaders," said Lawrence Korb, a former Pentagon manpower and readiness chief.

"So you really do have a very difficult organization you're taking over in terms of the personnel the readiness of the forces and the modernization," he said.

Obama has endorsed a costly 100,000 troop expansion of the army and marine corps that was begun under the Bush administration to ease the strains on the force.

Even after US troops are out of Iraq, his administration will face an estimated 100 billion dollar bill for replacing war damaged equipment and refitting US ground forces long.

But as recession bites and revenues decline, hard questions are bound to be asked about the Pentagon's 512 billion dollar base budget, the largest ever, which does not include the operational costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Experts say programs like missile defense and troubled, big ticket weapons programs like the army's Future Combat System and the air force's F-22 fighter will be vulnerable.
"I think the consensus even before Obama was elected was that given the decline in revenues, for example, you could not continue the same rate of growth in defense," said Korb.

"The question becomes what will be the growth. Will it be enough to keep pace with inflation or will we see a real decline in the defense budget?" he said.

 

[Kirkhill]

CD - Occasionally its nice to be wrong.


It's early days yet but I becoming cautiously optimistic.  Still watching and waiting though.

 

[Gasplug]

The US is the premier fighting force on the planet by such a long shot that it would have to go down by a heck of a lot to become the 2nd fiddle to anybody else on the globe!!!

Sounds like an empty promise to me ???

Gasplug

 

[tomahawk6]

I am cautious but not very optimistic. He has threatened to shut down the ABM program which I think is necessary in this increasingly unstable world we live in.He wants to discard the FCS program [no problem with that] and spending for modernization of the forces.With the hundreds of billions being cranked out in stimulus the defense budget is safe for awhile. But in the words of Reverend Wright "America's chickens will come home to roost" in the financial sense.We somehow are spending $5-7 trillion on a "bailout" that isnt working and at some point will have to be paid off.When that happens the defense budget will be cut before any of the other programs.

 

[HollywoodHitman]

How much of this is political posturing, followed by a 'well folks, now that I am in power, it seems that the situation might not be as black and white' ? Maybe he doesnt gut the military...Or.....

 

[theoldyoungguy]

coming from the point of a canadian and a soldier... i hope the US remians as strong as it is. We are inextricably tied to one another, and our defence is your defence and vice versa. What is good for the US 9 times out of 10 is good for Canada.

 

[Kirkhill]

I am cautious but not very optimistic. He has threatened to shut down the ABM program which I think is necessary in this increasingly unstable world we live in.He wants to discard the FCS program [no problem with that] and spending for modernization of the forces.With the hundreds of billions being cranked out in stimulus the defense budget is safe for awhile. But in the words of Reverend Wright "America's chickens will come home to roost" in the financial sense.We somehow are spending $5-7 trillion on a "bailout" that isnt working and at some point will have to be paid off.When that happens the defense budget will be cut before any of the other programs.

Agreed T6 - but you have to admit, it was looking a whole lot bleaker before the election, based on his own rhetoric and writings if not his friends and associates.

But to pick up on something else that you said, about the $5-7 Trillion in funds.  That is something that surprises the heck out of me.

Conventionally, I would have expected that amount of new cash to have an inflationary impact.  Printing money results in more dollars chasing the same amount of goods resulting in the price of goods being bid up (Weimar Republic style).  But so far there doesn't seem to be that much evidence of that.  Prices are holding, if not dropping, regardless of the "stimulus".

I am wondering if that is simply an indication of how intrinsic the dollar is to the global economy.  Regardless of the local currency all trades, at some level, are automatically and mentally compared to the dollar standard.  Even trades that may not be expressly cash base.

I am thinking back to earlier comments about Liquidity and M1, M2, M3, M4 and trying to estimate the size of the Global Economy.  I seem to recall Edward offering the opinions of experts that varied by multiple orders of magnitude.

Perhaps the economy is just that much larger in size than previously estimated and when money is printed it merely goes to cover a trade, monetary or not, that was going to happen in any case but might have even been a straight barter trade.

Consequently all this extra paper just gets sucked up with no obvious impact - neither the anticipated beneficial kind, nor the harmful kind.

I am amazed at how, outside the domains of the headless chickens, the world seems to be progressing pretty much the same as usual.