CTD said:
D
This topic was on the RCMP replacing the MP's on base. Why not send the MP's to depot and have them trained as RCMP, then carry out their duties as MP's but also be able to carry out all other police functions as the locals can. Good bad idea. who knows.
Thanks CTD for the follow up. As for your some what more than usual encounters with the MP it seems that
they all went down quite smoothly and satisfactorily. Agreed, the number and freqency could be annoying.
Concerning the loss of your property, vehicular theft is a very common occurrence and handled by all agencies in
all most the sameway. The basic information is gathered by Uniformed officers Time,Date,Place,Description and
any pertinent facts. A Report is completed, A Case File Nr. is assigned, the Vehicle Particulars and Licence Nr.
are Put on a Hot Sheet and the B&W's Network. Even though the location where your Property was taken
from could be classified as a Crime Scene (but only in a very remote sense). The responding Uniform Officers
are not equipped to carry out any Forensic procedures. Nor would they call for Detectives who after evaluating
the Scene call for Forensics, in this matter. Now if this property was found to be used in the commission of
another crime, heres where the ball starts to roll. It may seem unfair or insufficient at the outset but their are
SOP's and Protocols.
With regard to your suggest that the MP should/could receive additional training at the RCMP Depot, I fully
agree and have mentioned it a few replies back, good thinking.
In reply to Micheal Shannon, it would provide them with additional how, when and why tools. Remember
Police Officers have specific Rolls and Duties, Detectives and Investigators are a field appart.
With regard to LEO's doing 6 to 8 times more than the MP, that basically depends where their assigned.
But then, judging from my expreience, at the outside I'd say 2 to 3 and thats going some.