• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada's Sex Party. LOL

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pikache

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
900
Points
1,010
Thanks to Colbert Report, I came across this piece of gem

http://www.thesexparty.ca/

Part of their platform
quote:
Sex-Positive Holidays
The provincial Victoria Day holiday in May commemorates a monarch legendary for her negative attitudes towards female sexuality. The Sex Party would change Victoria Day to Eros Day to celebrate and encourage sex-positive expression.
There is no provincial holiday in February. The Sex Party would proclaim Valentines Day as an official holiday


quote:
Anal Sex
Federal criminal law prohibits anal sex between individuals younger than 18 or in sexual activity involving more than two people. Such prohibitions are unreasonable. The Sex Party would repeal them.

Child Pornography
The Sex Party supports all reasonable measures aimed at preventing the abuse of children involved in the production of sexually explicit media. Federal legislation prohibits the possession or production of photographs and films that depict real children involved in sexual activity. The Sex Party supports that law. But federal law also prohibits the possession of written material containing descriptions of sexual activity involving children. Such material could include novels, personal journals, or fantasies. No evidence suggests that the prohibition of such writing prevents harm to children. The Sex Party would delete that prohibition.


 
HighlandFusilier said:
Child Pornography
The Sex Party supports all reasonable measures aimed at preventing the abuse of children involved in the production of sexually explicit media. Federal legislation prohibits the possession or production of photographs and films that depict real children involved in sexual activity. The Sex Party supports that law. But federal law also prohibits the possession of written material containing descriptions of sexual activity involving children. Such material could include novels, personal journals, or fantasies. No evidence suggests that the prohibition of such writing prevents harm to children. The Sex Party would delete that prohibition.

Uhm ya...

Is this what we need to see?  As "funny" as Colbert is....This is a little out of line.

Just me as a Poster...

dileas

tess

 
actually, no.

the colbert clip was about the sex party suing canada post

i visited this party's site and came across their platform
 
aside from the kiddie porn thing, I kind of like them...all them seem to promote is more sex, which, coming from politicians, is about the least amount of "screwing" over the average person I've heard. :p
 
NCdt Lumber said:
Not sure how this is relevant to army.ca?

And that would probably be why it is in Radio Chatter, a lot of stuff in here doesn't pertain to army.ca....
 
241 said:
And that would probably be why it is in Radio Chatter, a lot of stuff in here doesn't pertain to army.ca....
give this man a prize ;D
 
Such material could include novels, personal journals, or fantasies.

This is a really difficult question for me. Someone who was say 16 and had sex and then wrote about it in a private journal should not be charged with a crime. As well many great novels couldnt be written today, this im not sure about. Fantasies should not be protected.

EDIT:
the anal sex thing clearly discriminates against homosexual males.
 
FascistLibertarian said:
EDIT:
the anal sex thing clearly discriminates against homosexual males.
Clearly, eh?  Does it say "anal sex between males who are under the age of 18"?  Unless you've been living under a rock,  you would have noticed that sometimes women are involved in said acts. 

Anyway, if we went to "proportional representation", we would see more and more single-issue parties such as this.  Eventually, they would have enough support to sit in legislature.  Then our system would stagnate.  Then we'd have odd-balls trying to rr-write history and take Victoria day off the calendar, even though Her Majesty was instrumental in Canada becoming a country in its own right in 1867 (hence "Victoria Day" being celebrated in Canada).
 
Clearly, eh?  Does it say "anal sex between males who are under the age of 18"?  Unless you've been living under a rock,  you would have noticed that sometimes women are involved in said acts. 

Yeah but hetrosexuals can have sex without anal and can lesbians. The law should be changed by either making the age for vaginal sex higher or anal sex lower.
 
There are a host of sexual acts in which 16 and 17 year old homosexuals can partake.  I shall leave it at that, and recommend that this thread be closed.
 
And ...

Locked. Usual caveats apply.

Although, I just can't imagine anything of use that could indeed be added to this.

ArmyVern
Army.ca Staff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top