• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All things Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

Bruce Monkhouse

Army.ca Myth
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Reaction score
500
Points
1,040
The long-term effects of haircuts are reasonably well known.
And it appears that so are the long term effects of not being vaccinated, some travel restrictions, employment restrictions, ...hey, just like not getting that haircut.
 

Loachman

Former Army Pilot in Drag
Staff member
Directing Staff
Reaction score
444
Points
980
And it appears that so are the long term effects of not being vaccinated, some travel restrictions, employment restrictions, ...hey, just like not getting that haircut.

Hardly equivalent.

And the haircut - and other policies - pre-existed my enrollment and were known and accepted.

Vaccine-based restrictions would represent an unreasonable and immoral midstream imposition.

Assuaging one party's unreasonable fears by putting pressure on another party's personal medical choices is neither reasonable nor moral.
 

Mick

Member
Reaction score
60
Points
380
You know what, that's fair.

Currently 2 provinces are doing vaccine passports, and one of those, Quebec, has said they won't be a used as a requirement for employment.

The Feds (Trudeau) have come out against it.( in a domestic sense)

So the only ones making inane arguments for some sort of societal restrictions based on vaccine status are people like you.

Whatever you say.

dapaterson said:
You already require proof of certain vaccinations for travel to certain countries. Some professions require proof of TB testing and, if there's a false positive, a chest xray.

Requiring proof of vaccination is nothing new... but thanks for reminding me. I have money to invest, and Alcan looks pretty good.
For international travel, sure.

For going to a restaurant, bar, sporting event? No.
 

Altair

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
342
Points
880
Whatever you say.
One cannot argue the requirements other countries have in place for entry.

One can argue what domestic requirements are for certain activities.

I don't bother with the former, and have had a consistent view on the latter.
 

Mick

Member
Reaction score
60
Points
380
One cannot argue the requirements other countries have in place for entry.

One can argue what domestic requirements are for certain activities.

I don't bother with the former, and have had a consistent view on the latter.
Fair enough.

I'll restate one last time before giving it a rest:

I fully support the ability of people to choose whether they receive a COVID vaccine or not.

Whatever one chooses, consequences may follow:

One can choose to receive the vaccine. Perhaps one will develop health complications down the road. I strongly believe that's unlikely, but it's a possible consequence I accept.

On the flip side, one can refuse the vaccine. In the near term, this decision will impact ease of travel (i.e. quarantine upon return) and may affect employment, and probably other aspects of one's life. One may expect these real and/or potential consequences until a greater number of Canadians are fully vaccinated.

This isn't an inane argument; it's what we as a country are currently living through, until more Canadians are fully vaccinated. I fully expect the latter consequences to continue to diminish as the number of fully vaccinated Canadians increases.
 

OceanBonfire

Sr. Member
Reaction score
37
Points
330
2 doses of Pfizer's shot was 88% effective at preventing symptomatic disease from the Delta variant, compared to 93.7% against the Alpha variant, broadly the same as previously reported.

Two shots of AstraZeneca vaccine were 67% effective against the Delta variant, up from 60% originally reported, and 74.5% effective against the Alpha variant, compared to an original estimate of 66% effectiveness.


And another study similar to a previous one weeks ago found that a larger gap between the 2 shots increases antibodies but doesn't last long after the first shot:

 
Top