• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
Infanteer and MSE Op are the traditional "Quick bring in a bunch to meet SIP at end of FY" occupations, whether they are needed or not .

This masks underperformance on other occupations year after year, and contributes to the current situation.
On top of that, we also have a ridiculous system designed to fail.

Back in the mid 10's my occupation was so short we were running our DP1 in a morning and night serial at the same time. Fast forward a year, and we were allowing anyone and everyone to OT because we were overborn in Pte/Cpl.

Now we are again back at ~80%, but short specifically in the MCpl-Sgt range... The very people we trained at night, then let go because according to the AMOR we were "fat".
 
Lots of simple data checks are also revealing. Like Hard Sea Trades being under 10% francophone. Imagine adding 15% to every hard sea trade's trained strength my matching Canada's OL profile.
 
AMOR is imperfect but important. Org design across the enterprise is important too - since we do little lateral entry, rank pyramid is important to have healthy promotion ratios - to select out.

The classic example was Int Op wanting more MCpl than Cpl, more Sgt than MCpl. WO at least was smaller than Sgt - but greater than Cpl.

That's been mostly fixed, but stupidity like "A Cpl can't brief a Col" needs to be stomped out - hard - whenever it recurs.
 
Lots of simple data checks are also revealing. Like Hard Sea Trades being under 10% francophone. Imagine adding 15% to every hard sea trade's trained strength my matching Canada's OL profile.
?

So conscript French Canadians to serve in the RCN? Or fire a bunch of Anglos?
 
AMOR is imperfect but important. Org design across the enterprise is important too - since we do little lateral entry, rank pyramid is important to have healthy promotion ratios - to select out.

The classic example was Int Op wanting more MCpl than Cpl, more Sgt than MCpl. WO at least was smaller than Sgt - but greater than Cpl.

That's been mostly fixed, but stupidity like "A Cpl can't brief a Col" needs to be stomped out - hard - whenever it recurs.
My occupation had 12 MCpl and 60 Sgts when I joined... We are still dealing with the aftermath of restructuring the training.

A Col doesn't need a Sgt/WO to brief them, but a brand new S3 that can barely read the GFA themself is not a useful briefer either.
 
My occupation had 12 MCpl and 60 Sgts when I joined... We are still dealing with the aftermath of restructuring the training.

A Col doesn't need a Sgt/WO to brief them, but a brand new S3 that can barely read the GFA themself is not a useful briefer either.
Many Maj / LCol are not useful briefers, either.

No names.
 
Many Maj / LCol are not useful briefers, either.

No names.
I've met a few in my "new" branch...

I've had a couple of people try to take on my briefings. I gave them as polite of a "f**k-off" as I could muster, and proceeded to conduct the brief myself. I may not be great, but I at least understand what I'm talking about better than most people in the room.
 
There is a plan to try BMQ/DP1 for Infantry, but for many other occupations that doesn't work.

There aren't battalions of mechanics, clerks, or Met Techs that can rotate through a system like that.
You have to start someplace.

For the mechanics clerks etc there are community colleges if you work it right. The math is still the math. You don't get people out of the pipe unless you grease the pipe with something. If you don't, you're in a death spiral. There's always a point where one has to quit wringing ones hands and actually face the problem head on.

🍻
 
You have to start someplace.

For the mechanics clerks etc there are community colleges if you work it right. The math is still the math. You don't get people out of the pipe unless you grease the pipe with something. If you don't, you're in a death spiral. There's always a point where one has to quit wringing ones hands and actually face the problem head on.

🍻
Sure, there are definitely some cases where we can look at the civvy world and say "close enough for government work".

The problem is, we don't offer anything competitive enough to draw most of the civvy collage people we want... To the average 20-30 year old, a pension after 25 years isn't much incentive when compared against more take-home money now, and no silly military BS.
 
You have to start someplace.

For the mechanics clerks etc there are community colleges if you work it right. The math is still the math. You don't get people out of the pipe unless you grease the pipe with something. If you don't, you're in a death spiral. There's always a point where one has to quit wringing ones hands and actually face the problem head on.

🍻
Here is an example of us just giving up at greasing the pipe. Friend of mine is in DP1 for the new Cyber op trade, really cool stuff, but day one they were told their career expectancy is 1 year after DP2, why? because after 1 year they can jump shit and work for CSEC for $140k a year doing the same thing we are training them to do.
 
Here is an example of us just giving up at greasing the pipe. Friend of mine is in DP1 for the new Cyber op trade, really cool stuff, but day one they were told their career expectancy is 1 year after DP2, why? because after 1 year they can jump shit and work for CSEC for $140k a year doing the same thing we are training them to do.
To be fair to the CAF, we are held hostage by TB...

Apparently TB considers our crappy, ill-fitting uniforms as part of our overall compensation package, so they won't bump pay without taking something else away.
 
I've met a few in my "new" branch...

I've had a couple of people try to take on my briefings. I gave them as polite of a "f**k-off" as I could muster, and proceeded to conduct the brief myself. I may not be great, but I at least understand what I'm talking about better than most people in the room.

Which is the not so secret secret of a great presentation ;)
 
To be fair to the CAF, we are held hostage by TB...

Apparently TB considers our crappy, ill-fitting uniforms as part of our overall compensation package, so they won't bump pay without taking something else away.
You'd think they would of atleast be given sprc pay though
 
Back
Top