You have cited doctrine as the reason why RCAF should retain oversight/authority. That rationale doesn’t stand up to scrutiny or debate.Capabilities evolve,new concepts are introduced. Otherwise,Maginot Lines for all.
I get it that sometime fighter pilots make up their own rules, but sometimes you talk outta your ass.
This from CFJP 01 Canadian Military Doctrine. Link below.
The concept and purpose of doctrine
Yeah FJAG, this is really disconcerting. The number of vexatious/frivolous lawsuits, both domestically and ICC driven, against UK forces, is surreal. Do you think the US disdain for the ICC, while the UK abides by it, has been the reason why the US sees relatively few of these cases?
So you have taken the Schrödinger's cat approach.
Take a stance, and support it with facts, rather than ad hominem attacks. Rebut his conjecture, run rings around him logically. Otherwise, your postings merit no more consideration than his, but at least he presented an argument.
I updated my post above.
It is said that Perception = reality.
What is utterly ridiculous is for you to trash a poster, get called on it, and then decide that you are taking your ball and going home. I simply asked that you rebut his concerns. Your failure to even contemplate this COA would...
FJ actually answered your question with his concerns. Now the "burden of truth" is back on you with your illegitimate election trope comment.
It's fine to take a side or make a stand. It's not fine to make snide comments about someone's concerns. If you can rebut it, then do so.
It's a complicated/tricky space.
GTA has roughly 6.5 M folks in it, or about 17% of the population. So the potential recruit base is fairly large.
It also has the most diverse population of any major centre in Canada. When I was at LFCA in the 90's/2K's, The Royal Regiment of Canada could...