His opinions on the subject of discussion, as a guy with zero skin in the game, are irrelevant to me. I asked a simple, legitimate, question to a fellow serving member. Wasn't his place to answer, especially not with sarcasm, for which he has scolded many others.
Same goes for you. You don't...
It's a very simple question. And btw, what's it to you? As a non-serving member who is unaffected by these changes, your opinion - though entitled to it - really has no bearing on the topic of discussion.
Nope, not even close. A nine-year-old girl using an Uzi is indefensible. Wait until the kid is a bit older and more capable of safely handling it. To try and make it sound "normal" - which it is anything but - does nothing but prejudice the defence of responsible gun ownership rights and laws.
As a CF member and thus someone who could have potentially used this entitlement to your benefit in the future, care to explain what's so good about this change?
I disagree. None of the points he makes are salient nor can anything he said be considered intelligent human interaction. He compared allowing a nine-year-old girl to fire an Uzi (on full auto no less), with taking a ride in a car or a swim in the backyard pool. The comparison was asinine and...
Sure, no worries. We'll just call it the Retired Canadian Forces Health and Dental Care Plan. Nothing would make me happier than to de-link every single aspect of my compensation and benefits from the Public Service, for reasons I've previously stated elsewhere on here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.