Author Topic: Next-Gen Aircrew Training - Skies Magazine  (Read 1317 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dimsum

    West coast best coast.

  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 203,675
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,913
  • Living the staff life
Next-Gen Aircrew Training - Skies Magazine
« on: July 24, 2019, 10:25:54 »
Skies Mag seems to have had a blitz of RCAF articles - first the fighter procurement article, then the feature on the CAOC, now this:

Quote
Rarely in the life of a large, complex military program do you get the opportunity to reshape it from the ground up. But with two pilot training contracts coming to an end in the mid-2020s, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) is taking advantage of the moment to “reimagine how we are doing training,” said Col Pete Saunders, director of Air Simulation and Training.

RCAF pilots obtain their wings through two contracted training services, Contracted Flying Training and Support (CFTS) and NATO Flying Training in Canada (NFTC), delivered from two schools in Manitoba and Saskatchewan: 3 Canadian Forces Flying Training School (3 CFFTS) at the Southport Aerospace Centre in Portage la Prairie and 2 Canadian Forces Flying Training School (2 CFFTS) at 15 Wing Moose Jaw.

CFTS, delivered by Allied Wings and led by KF Aerospace, ends in 2027 while NFTC, provided by CAE Military Aviation Training, runs until December 2023, with the option for a one-year extension–the program was recently extended from 2021.

At same time, the RCAF would like to transition in-house training of its air combat systems officers (ACSO) and airborne electronic sensor operators (AESOp) to the same program as pilot training, a move partially driven by the end of service life of their primary training platform, the Dash-8 “Gonzo” in 2028.

“There are things we have done really well, things we probably wouldn’t do that way again, so this is an opportunity to re-baseline everything,” said Saunders.

By concentrating all aircrew training under one program, the RCAF is requesting one of the more comprehensive and ambitious industry-managed programs worldwide, from courseware and training devices to aircraft and maintenance, instructors and facilities management.

The Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) program hasn’t yet released an official price tag, but with NFTC worth about $3.8 billion over 25 years and CFTS valued at $1.8 billion over 22 years, the eventual contract could exceed $10 billion over 20 plus years.

More than 80 companies initially expressed interest in the program and five have been down-selected to offer bids when a request for proposals is released in early 2020: Airbus Defence and Space, Babcock Canada, Leonardo Canada, Lockheed Martin Canada, and SkyAlyne Canada, a joint venture between the two incumbents, CAE and KF Aerospace. A sixth qualified bidder, BAE Systems, withdrew in April.

What they will be asked to bid on boils down to a single word: Output. In presentations to industry over the past two years, Saunders has stressed, “it is not an aircraft acquisition program, it is a training service, [and] what we are contracting for is output. How a successful supplier gets there, I am not that fussed. What I care about is the output.”

And that is a straightforward demand: 120 pilots, 40 ACSOs and 36 AESOps, plus or minus 15 per cent, to a defined standard every year. The flexibility to ramp up or down is intended to deal with shortages–the RCAF is at about 82.6 per cent of manning or around 275 pilots short at the moment–the introduction of new fleets like remotely-piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), and the transition from legacy to new airframes when throughput may not be as high.

The numbers are based on demographic shifts and forecasted attrition rates, a “sweet spot” that acknowledges the fact the newer generations may be less likely to enroll for a 25-year career, he said.

The Air Force also wants a program adaptable to technological change as both training systems and teaching methodologies evolve. “Our existing programs are delivering exactly what we are asking for, but they don’t have that flexibility baked into them, which then handcuffs the contractor who would love to do things slightly differently, but it comes at a certain cost,” said Saunders.

[More at link]


https://www.skiesmag.com/features/future-aircrew-training-program-next-gen-aircrew-training/
“If you run into an a-hole in the morning, you ran into an a-hole. If you run into a-holes all day, you're the a-hole.”

- Raylan Givens, Justified (cleaned up for content)

Offline Eye In The Sky

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 237,325
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,232
    • VP INTERNATIONAL
Re: Next-Gen Aircrew Training - Skies Magazine
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2019, 16:33:46 »
I'm not sure it is flattering for the RCAF to have to contract military aircrew training to civilian companies.  I'd like to see how the numbers crunch if the RCAF uses the same funding and creates it's own FAcT TE/Sqn.  :2c:

I'm a little hesitant to lean too much on civilian contracting and contractors, without seeing some indication that the RCAF will retain 'final say' on all things that are important.  Historically, I am not confident in the way Canada does contracts. 

Quote
what we are contracting for is output. How a successful supplier gets there, I am not that fussed. What I care about is the output.

That's not a statement I get a comfortable feeling from.  I certainly care "how a supplier gets there".  36 AES Ops/year isn't enough (and won't be if the rumoured demands for more operators happens...) and if they are only half-trained or indoctrinated when they hit OTUs, that isn't ideal. 

Again, just my initial  :2c:.  I'd prefer to see the RCAF be it's own supplier.

"What a f$$kin' week!" - me, every Monday at about 1130hrs.

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 249,335
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 11,872
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: Next-Gen Aircrew Training - Skies Magazine
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2019, 16:42:05 »
...I'd prefer to see the RCAF be it's own supplier.

That ship pretty much sailed in the mid-90s with FRP and ASD. :nod:  It would probably take 20+ years to recreate with any representation of what we used to have.

:2c:

Regards

G2G

Offline dapaterson

    Halfway to being an idiot-savant.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 512,660
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 17,887
Re: Next-Gen Aircrew Training - Skies Magazine
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2019, 17:35:11 »
And the RCAF leadership has let the contractor mafia run with minimal oversight.  Engaged leadership would have mitigated some of the current problems.
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html