• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Tom Mulcair was perhaps one of the best leaders the NDP had .I'm still trying figure out why they got rid of him . And replacing hin with a near non entity .
Because he dared to say he would balance the budget. That was heresy in NDP lifer circles. And he committed the other heresy of being a Liberal prior to being a Dipper. So pragmatist + newcomer = extremely short leash.

Amongst the Dipper lifer circles, th leader can be a complete failure as long as you’re ideologically pure. It doesn’t matter if the leader has made the Party irrelevant and the government is eating their lunch.
 
Good news is that the CDS and CAFCWO combined won't spend that much on their hair for the rest of their lives.
Nor should anyone that follows. Our regs have evolved as such that grooming costs are no longer an issue 😉
 
Because he dared to say he would balance the budget. That was heresy in NDP lifer circles. And he committed the other heresy of being a Liberal prior to being a Dipper. So pragmatist + newcomer = extremely short leash.

Amongst the Dipper lifer circles, th leader can be a complete failure as long as you’re ideologically pure. It doesn’t matter if the leader has made the Party irrelevant and the government is eating their lunch.
Classic Left.

Never communist enough for a real Communist.
 
I have actually had people express that in conversation with me.
The time to worry about the NDP is when they elect someone who stands before us in a pair of jeans and a sweatshirt or a t-shift and wears a simple Timex watch. Someone who donates a sizeable portion of his/her MP's salary to the local food bank or soup kitchen. Someone who surrounds themselves with aides/advisors who dress the same as he/she does and does the same thing with their salaries. That is when you will know that they are serious about their socialist mantra and are looking gather their base and make their version of change happen.
 
serious question: this thread started almost a year ago and is now on page 158. With all those comments is there even one that tangibly demonstrates living up to the theme of boosting defense spending?
 
The RCAF is getting ball hats at some point?

Randy Savage Yes GIF by WWE
 
It was a hint, not a commitment.

The parties controlling Parliament happily blew out the budget even before crisis struck, took measures that blew it out further to deal with crisis, and added substantial new program spending. All of that was popular (enough) with voters. The stories I see on CBC are mostly about "health care in crisis", not "defence in crisis". Even here, who is willing to give up their new childcare subsidy or dental care subsidy (if eligible), or accept a return to, say, year 2000 income tax rates?

Defence is going to be "managed readiness" at the macro level for the long-term foreseeable future. "Full capability" (whatever that might be, but assuming it means at least one each minor naval, land, and air formation ready to go with necessary contemporary capabilities) isn't on the table.
 
It was a hint, not a commitment.

The parties controlling Parliament happily blew out the budget even before crisis struck, took measures that blew it out further to deal with crisis, and added substantial new program spending. All of that was popular (enough) with voters. The stories I see on CBC are mostly about "health care in crisis", not "defence in crisis". Even here, who is willing to give up their new childcare subsidy or dental care subsidy (if eligible), or accept a return to, say, year 2000 income tax rates?

Defence is going to be "managed readiness" at the macro level for the long-term foreseeable future. "Full capability" (whatever that might be, but assuming it means at least one each minor naval, land, and air formation ready to go with necessary contemporary capabilities) isn't on the table.
Not so sure about the above.

If you add multiple weeks of what has just occurred regarding these unknown source of balloons popping up over various places in NA, specifically moving them down from Alaska/Yukon to more mundane places like Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, North Bay, Sherbrooke, Kansas City, Sacramento, Boise, Tallahassee, Atlanta, New Orleans, Houston, etc and you'll start to see yammering about the need for more funding of the CAF. If it continues to be ONLY US fighters shooting down balloons across Canadian airspace then the pressure will be on for the Petit Dauphin to do something.
 
Back
Top